1887
Reframing framing
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

One of the main challenges resulting from the past two decades of shift toward detailed micro-analytic studies of language and interaction has been the awareness of a need to relate microanalysis to wider social-cultural aspects of interactional situations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.06coo
2011-01-01
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P
    (1992) Introduction: John Gumperz’ approach to contextualization. In P. Auer and A. DeLuzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1-37. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.03aue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.03aue [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, W
    (1977) The recall and verbalization of past experience. In R.W. Cole (ed.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 215-246.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duranti, A. , and C. Goodwin
    (eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. InRethinking Context. Cambridge /New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner, H
    (1985) The Mind’s New Science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Levinson, S.C
    (2003) “Contextualizing” contextualization cues. In S.L. Eerdmans , C.L. Prevignano , and P.J. Thibault (eds.), Language and Interaction: Discussion with John J. Gumperz. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 31-39. doi: 10.1075/z.117.04lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.117.04lev [Google Scholar]
  6. Muench, R. , and N.J. Smelser
    (1987) Relating the micro and the macro. In J. Alexander , B. Geisen , R. Muench , N.J. Smelser (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, pp. 356-388.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Putnam, L.L. , and R.P. Fuller
    (2010) Negotiation and public campaigns: The case of the 2007-2008 writers’ strike. Paper presented at theNational Communication Association. San Francisco, CA, November.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schank, R. , and R. Abelson
    (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tannen, D
    (ed.) (1993) What’s in a frame: Surface evidence for underlying expectations. Framing in Discourse. Oxford /New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-56.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.2.06coo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error