oa Enticing a challengeable in arguments

References

1. Atkinson, Maxwell , and Paul Drew
   (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clayman, Steven , and John Heritage
   (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
3. Coulter, Jeff
   (1990) Elementary properties of argument sequences. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence. Washington: University Press of America, pp. 181–203.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dersley, Ian , and Anthony Wootton
   (2000) Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 375–406. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
   https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02 [Google Scholar]
5. Edwards, Derek , and Alessandra Fasulo
   (2006) “To be honest”: Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 343–376. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_1
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_1 [Google Scholar]
6. Goodwin, Charles
   (1996) Transparent vision. In Elinor Ochs , Emmanuel Schegloff , and Sandra Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
7. Gruber, Helmut
   (2001) Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics33: 1851–1857. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00083‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00083-7 [Google Scholar]
8. Goodwin, Charles , and John Heritage
   (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 283–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
9. Heinemann, Trine
   (2008) Questions of accountability: Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies10: 55–71. doi: 10.1177/1461445607085590
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085590 [Google Scholar]
10. Heritage, John
    (2002) The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1427–1446. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
11. Heritage, John , and Geoffrey Raymond
    (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15–38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
12. Heritage, John , and Steven Clayman
    (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hester, Stephen , and Peter Eglin
    (1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Housley, William , and Richard Fitzgerald
    (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis, Qualitative Research2: 59–83. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
15. Hutchby, Ian
    (1996a) Confrontation talk: Argument, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Hilldale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hutchby, Ian
    (1996b) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society7: 481–97. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007004003 [Google Scholar]
17. Jayyusi, Lena
    (1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jefferson, Gail
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp13–31. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
19. Koshik, Irene
    (2002) A conversation-analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1851–77. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00057‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7 [Google Scholar]
20. Koshik, Irene
    (2003) Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies5: 51–77. doi: 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
21. Levinson, Stephen
    (1992) Activity types and language. In Paul Drew , and John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Maynard, Douglas
    (1985) How children start arguments. Language in Society14: 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010915 [Google Scholar]
23. Mehan, Hugh
    (1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
24. Monzoni, Chiara
    (2008) Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of “pre-sequences”. Discourse Studies10: 73–87. doi: 10.1177/1461445607085591
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085591 [Google Scholar]
25. Muntigl, Peter , and William Turnbull
    (1998) Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics29: 225–256. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00048‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9 [Google Scholar]
26. Paoletti, Isabella
    (1998) Handling "incoherence" according to speaker's on-sight categorization. In Charles Antaki , and Sue Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 171–190.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs55: 360–73. doi: 10.1080/03637758809376177
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376177 [Google Scholar]
29. Raymond, Geoffrey
    (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68: 939–67. doi: 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, Harvey
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Jefferson, Gail (ed.)with introductions by Schegloff, Emmanuel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sacks, Harvey , Emmanuel Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
32. Schegloff, Emmanuel
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70: 1075–95. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
33. Schegloff, Emmanuel
    (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?". Sociological Inquiry50: 104–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff, Emmanuel
    (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
35. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society13: 311–335. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
36. Sharrock, Wes
    (1974) On owning knowledge. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 45–53.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stokoe, Elizabeth , and Derek Edwards
    (2008) "Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?" Silly questions and their answers in police–suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies10: 89–111. doi: 10.1177/1461445607085592
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085592 [Google Scholar]
38. Stokoe, Elizabeth , and Derek Edwards
    (2010) Asking ostensibly silly questions in police-suspect interrogations. In Alice Freed , and Susan Erlich (eds.), Why do you ask: The functions of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–133.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vuchinich, Samuel
    (1990) The sequential organisation of closing in verbal family conflict. In Allen Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–139.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Watson, Rod
    (1997) Some general reflections on 'Categorization' and 'Sequence' in the analysis of conversation. In Stephen Hester , and Peter Eglin (eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]