Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Schegloff described utterances such as “lemme ask you a question” as pre-questions, pre-pre’s or pre-delicates (Schegloff 1980). This paper provides a discussion of similar utterances in a specific institutional setting - political radio phone-in programs in Israel. The participants use these utterances in ways that are similar to Schegloff’s description. Yet, the pre-construction has additional institutional functions for the differing roles of the host and the caller. Hosts use these utterances to manage the interaction during overlaps as a means to secure an exclusive turn of talk following them. Callers use them infrequently at the beginning of their talk as story-prompts. Hosts may challenge this usage and the interactional role reversal. Regular callers can use the pre-constructions similarly to hosts. In this way, the pre-constructions in the Israeli radio phone-in programs are employed as interactional practices that relate and construct the roles in this institutional setting.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Atkinson, Maxwell J
    (1984) Our masters' voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , and Juliane House
    (1989) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior. In Shoshana Blum-Kulka , Juliane House & Gabriel Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics. New Jersey: Norwood, pp. 123-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , and Elit Olshtain
    (1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics5.3: 196-213. doi: 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dori-Hacohen, G
    (2009) Citizens talk about public affairs: The description of the political phone-in program on Israeli public radio. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Haifa.
  5. Fitzgerald, Richard , and William Housley
    (2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5: 579-602. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013005275
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275 [Google Scholar]
  6. Greatbatch, David
    (1988) A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society17.3: 401-430. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1992) On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268-301.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hacohen, G
    (2007) Narrative and argumentation in Israel radio phone-ins. In Frans H. van Eemeren , Anthony J. Blair , C.A. Willard , & Bart Garssen (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th ISSA conference. Amsterdam: SicSat, pp. 549-556.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamo, Michal
    (2006) Caught between freedom and control: ‘Ordinary’ people’s discursive positioning on an Israeli prime-time talk show. Discourse & Society 17.4: 427-446. doi: 10.1177/0957926506062361
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506062361 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, John
    (1985) Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. New York: Academic Press, pp. 95-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2002) Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. In Phillip J. Glenn , Curtis D. LeBaron & Jenny S. Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 57-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heritage, John , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    (1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society23: 1-29. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017656
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John , and Geoffrey Raymond
    (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68.1: 15-38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchby, Ian
    (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1999) Beyond agnosticism? Conversation analysis and the sociological agenda. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32.1&2: 85-93. doi: 10.1080/08351813.1999.9683611
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683611 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2001) ‘Witnessing’: The use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio. Discourse Studies 34: 481-497. doi: 10.1177/1461445601003004009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, Gail
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13-31. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  18. Katriel, Tamar
    (2004) Dialogic moments: From soul talks to talk radio in Israeli culture. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Labov, William
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Labov, William , David Fanshel
    (1977) Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Liddicoat, Anthony , Sussanne Döpke , Kristina Love , and Anne Brown
    (1995) Presenting a point of view: Callers’ contributions to talkback radio in Australia. Journal of Pragmatics22: 139-156. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90064‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90064-7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maschler, Yael
    (1998) Rotsè lishmoa kéta?'wanna hear something weird/funny[lit.'a segment']?': The discourse markers segmenting Israeli Hebrew talk-in-interaction. In Andrias H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13-59. doi: 10.1075/pbns.57.04mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.04mas [Google Scholar]
  23. Maschler, Yael , and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
    (in press) From sequential to affective discourse marker: Hebrew nu on Israeli political phone-in radio programs. Discourse Studies 14.5.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McCarthy, Michael J. , and Anne O’Keeffe
    (2003) ‘What’s in a name?’: Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.)Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 153-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McLeish, Robert
    (2005) Radio Production (5th edition). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Panese Marcello
    (2010) Calling in: Prosody and conversation in radio-talk. Pragmatics6.1: 19-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984a) Agreement and disagreement with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1984b) Pursuing a response. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.152-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raymond, Geoffrey
    (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68: 939-967. doi: 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sacks, Harvey
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In Joel Sherzer & Bauman Richard (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-353.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, A. Emanuel
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70.6: 1075-1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?”Sociological Inquiry50.3-4: 104-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  33. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse:Text and talk.(Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In Graham Button & Jon R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 70-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1992) On talk and its institutional occasions. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2000) Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society29.1: 1-63. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 101-134. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stivers, Tanya , and Makoto Hayashi
    (2010) Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society39: 1-25. doi: 10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
  39. Weizman, Elda
    (2008) Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ds.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.3 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error