oa Picking fights with politicians

References

1. Abrams, Dominic, and Giovanni A. Travaglino
   2018 “Immigration, Political Trust, and Brexit-Testing an Aversion Amplification Hypothesis.” British Journal of Social Psychology57 (2): 310–326. 10.1111/bjso.12233
   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12233 [Google Scholar]
2. Bowman, Jonathan W. P., and Keon West
   2020 “Brexit: The Influence of Motivation to Respond without Prejudice, Willingness to Disagree, and Attitudes to Immigration.” British Journal of Social Psychology60 (1): 222–247. 10.1111/bjso.12383
   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12383 [Google Scholar]
3. Bull, Peter, and Will Strawson
   2019 “Can’t Answer? Won’t Answer? An Analysis of Equivocal Responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Parliamentary Affairs73 (2): 429–449. 10.1093/pa/gsz003
   https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz003 [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, Carly W., Richard Fitzgerald, and Rod Gardner
   2009 “Branching Out: Ethnomethodological Approaches to Communication.” Australian Journal of Communication36 (3): 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clarke, Harold D., Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley
   2017 Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584408
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584408 [Google Scholar]
6. Clarke, John, and Janet Newman
   2019 “What’s the Subject? Brexit and Politics as Articulation.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology29 (1): 67–77. 10.1002/casp.2376
   https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2376 [Google Scholar]
7. Clift, Rebecca, and Marco Pino
   2020 “Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction53 (4): 463–480. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1826765
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1826765 [Google Scholar]
8. Clifton, Jonathan
   2009 “A Membership Categorization Analysis of the Waco Siege: Perpetrator-Victim Identity as a Moral Discrepancy Device for ‘Doing’ Subversion.” Sociological Research Online14 (5): 38–48. 10.5153/sro.2002
   https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2002 [Google Scholar]
9. Coupland, Nikolas
   2003 “Sociolinguistic Authenticities.” Journal of Sociolinguistics7 (3): 417–431. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00233
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00233 [Google Scholar]
10. Cromdal, Jakob
    2004 “Building Bilingual Oppositions: Code-Switching in Children’s Disputes.” Language in Society33 (1): 33–58. 10.1017/S0047404504031021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504031021 [Google Scholar]
11. D’Hondt, Sigurd
    2013 “Analyzing Equivalences in Discourse: Are Discourse Theory and Membership Categorization Analysis Compatible?” Pragmatics23 (3): 421–445. 10.1075/prag.23.3.03hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.3.03hon [Google Scholar]
12. Demasi, Mirko A.
    2019 “Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology40 (1): 3–20. 10.1111/pops.12496
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12496 [Google Scholar]
13. Dersley, Ian, and Anthony Wootton
    2000 “Complaint Sequences within Antagonistic Argument.” Research on Language and Social Interaction33: 375–406. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02 [Google Scholar]
14. Eglin, Peter, and and Stephen Hester
    1992 “Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action.” Semiotica88 (3–4): 243–268.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester
    1999 ““You’re All a Bunch of Feminists”: Categorization and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies22 (2–4): 253–272. 10.1023/A:1005444602547
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005444602547 [Google Scholar]
16. Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester
    2003 The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley, and Carly W. Butler
    2009 “Omnirelevance and Interactional Context.” Australian Journal of Communication36 (3): 45–64.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fitzgerald, Richard, and Joanna Thornborrow
    2017 “‘I’m a Scouser’: Membership Categories and Political Geography in the 2016 UK Election Call Phone-in”. Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 40–58. 10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit [Google Scholar]
19. Francis, David, and Sally Hester
    2017 “Stephen Hester on the Problem of Culturalism.” Journal of Pragmatics118: 56–63. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.005 [Google Scholar]
20. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hänska-Ahy, Max, and Stefan Bauchowitz
    2017 Tweeting for Brexit: How Social Media Influenced the Referendum. InBrexit, Trump and the Media, ed. byJ. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, and R. Tait. 31–35. Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hardaker, Claire
    2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research6 (2): 215–242. 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
23. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    1997a Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
    1997b “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” InCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. byStephen Hester, and Peter Eglin. 1–23. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth H. Stokoe
    2015 “Offers of Assistance in Politician-Constituent Interaction.” Discourse Studies17 (6): 724–751. 10.1177/1461445615602376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602376 [Google Scholar]
26. Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth H. Stokoe
    2018 “Getting Service at the Constituency Office: Analyzing Citizens’ Encounters with their Member of Parliament.” Text & Talk38 (5): 551–573. 10.1515/text‑2018‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0014 [Google Scholar]
27. Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2002 “The Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorization Analysis.” Qualitative Research2 (1): 59–83. 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
28. Housley, William
    2002 “Moral Discrepancy and ‘Fudging the Issue’ in a Radio News Interview.” Sociology36 (1): 5–21. 10.1177/0038038502036001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036001001 [Google Scholar]
29. Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2003 “Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview.” Sociological Research Online8 (2): 18–26. 10.5153/sro.795
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.795 [Google Scholar]
30. Housley, William, Helena Webb, Adam Edwards, Rob Procter, and Marina Jirotka
    2017 “Digitizing Sacks? Approaching Social Media as Data.” Qualitative Research17 (6): 627–644. 10.1177/1468794117715063
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117715063 [Google Scholar]
31. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Joyce, Jack B., Bogdana Humă, Hanna-Leena Ristimäki, Fabio Ferraz de Almeida, and Ann Doehring
    2021 “Speaking out Against Everyday Sexism: Gender and Epistemics in Accusations of “Mansplaining”.” Feminism & Psychology30 (4): 502–529. 10.1177/0959353520979499
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520979499 [Google Scholar]
33. Joyce, Jack B., and Linda Walz
    2021 Picking Fights with Politicians Dataset.   10.21251/527b6b95‑f6c1‑45cc‑8292‑806cdc904130
    https://doi.org/10.21251/527b6b95-f6c1-45cc-8292-806cdc904130 [Google Scholar]
34. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2018 “Social Media in/and the Politics of the European Union: Politico-Organizational Communication, Institutional Cultures and Self-Inflicted Elitism.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (2): 243–266. 10.1075/jlp.18001.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18001.krz [Google Scholar]
35. Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil
    2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’, and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society15 (2–3): 243–266. 10.1177/0957926504041019
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041019 [Google Scholar]
36. Meredith, Joanne, and Emma Richardson
    2019 “The Use of the Political Categories of Brexiter and Remainer in Online Comments about the EU referendum.” Community and Applied Social Psychology29 (1): 43–55. 10.1002/casp.2384
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2384 [Google Scholar]
37. Nishizaka, Aug
    2021 “Partitioning a Population in Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics172: 225–238. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.015 [Google Scholar]
38. O’Driscoll, Jim, and Leslie Jeffries
    2019 “Introduction: The Origins of The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. byM. Evans, L. Jeffries, and J. O’Driscoll. 1–9. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-18 [Google Scholar]
39. Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society35 (5): 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
40. Reynolds, Edward
    2011 “Enticing a Challengeable in Arguments: Sequence, Epistemics and Preference Organisation.” Pragmatics21 (3): 411–430. 10.1075/prag.21.3.06rey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.06rey [Google Scholar]
41. Reynolds, Edward
    2015 “How Participants in Arguments Challenge the Normative Position of an Opponent.” Discourse Studies17 (3): 299–316. 10.1177/1461445615571198
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615571198 [Google Scholar]
42. Robles, Jessica S.
    2011 “Doing Disagreement in the House of Lords: ‘Talking around the Issue’ as a Context-Appropriate Argumentative Strategy.” Discourse & Communication5 (2): 147–168. 10.1177/1750481310395452
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310395452 [Google Scholar]
43. Robles, Jessica S., and Theresa Castor
    2019 “Taking the Moral High Ground: Practices for Being Uncompromisingly Principled.” Journal of Pragmatics141: 115–129. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.015 [Google Scholar]
44. Sacks, Harvey
    1984 “On Doing “Being Ordinary”.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage. 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sacks, Harvey
    1995 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
46. Stokoe, Elizabeth H.
    2003 “Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorization in Neighbour Disputes.” Feminism and Psychology13 (3): 317–344. 10.1177/0959353503013003006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353503013003006 [Google Scholar]
47. Tainio, Liisa
    2003 “‘When Shall We Go for a Ride?’ A Case of the Sexual Harassment of a Young Girl.” Discourse & Society14 (2): 173–190. 10.1177/0957926503014002754
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002754 [Google Scholar]
48. Van Schepen, Nynke
    2019 “Political Transparency Matters: Citizens Challenging Officials via ‘Have You Planned X’-Type Questions.” Discourse & Society30 (5): 521–535. 10.1177/0957926519855784
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519855784 [Google Scholar]
49. Walz, Linda, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2020 “A Stranger in a Foreign Land: Identity Transition in Blogs about Transnational Relocation.” Discourse, Context & Media36: 1–9. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100413
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100413 [Google Scholar]
50. Widdicombe, Sue, and Robin Wooffitt
    1990 “‘Being’ versus ‘Doing’ Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology9 (4): 257–277. 10.1177/0261927X9094003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X9094003 [Google Scholar]