1887
image of Power dynamics and pragma-cultural sources of unsourced evidentiality in Persian
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates participants’ reflections on power relations embedded in the cultural-pragmatics of unsourced evidentials in Persian texts. Using critical discourse analysis, we adopted ethnography of referential practices and power dynamics to analyse 16 Persian texts through follow up interviews and focus group discussions on two opposing pairs of texts – one pair on Iranian national identity versus Persian literature, and another on Iranian politics versus religion. Our analysis revealed that unsourced evidentials appear in Persian predominantly due to censorship and sometimes due to deliberate use by authors (e.g., for winning an argument). Text consumers often overlook unsourced evidentials while reflecting on politico-religious referents, such as inequalities and bigotry. This has roots in Persian literature, religion, and politics of power embedded in the culture, and the participants’ attention to inequalities and discriminations has roots in referential practices in current Iranian discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21029.zai
2022-10-04
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2015 “Evidentials: Their Links with Other Grammatical Categories.” Linguistic Typology19 (2): 239–278. 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amanat, Abbas
    2012 “Introduction: Iranian Identity Boundaries: A Historical Overview.” InIran Facing Others: Identity Boundaries in a Historical Perspective, ed. byAbbas Amanat, and Farzin Vejdani, 1–33. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137013408_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137013408_1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Asgharzadeh, Alireza
    2007Iran and the Challenge of Diversity: Islamic Fundamentalism, Aryanist, Racism, and Democratic Struggles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230604889
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604889 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ball, Stephen J.
    2013Foucault, Power and Education. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203092781
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092781 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boroumand, Ladan
    2020 “Iranians Turn Away from the Islamic Republic.” Journal of Democracy31 (1): 169–181. 10.1353/jod.2020.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0014 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chafe, Wallace
    1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” InEvidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. byWallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 261–272. New Jersey: Ablex Publication Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Collier, Stephen
    2009 “Topologies of Power: Foucault’s Analysis of Political Government Beyond ‘Governmentality’.” Theory, Culture & Society26 (6): 78–108. 10.1177/0263276409347694
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409347694 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornillie, Bert
    2004 “The Shift from Lexical to Subjective Readings of Spanish Prometer ‘to Promise’ and Amenazar ‘to Threaten’. A Corpus-Based Account.” Pragmatics14 (1): 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dabashi, Hamid
    2019The Shahnameh: The Persian Epic as World Literature. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/daba18344
    https://doi.org/10.7312/daba18344 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davari, Shadi, and Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan
    2017 “The Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in Persian.” InThe Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality, ed. byVolker Gast, 163–190. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110519389‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110519389-007 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dehkordi Ebrahimi, Mojdeh, and Allami Hamid
    2012 “Evidentiality in Academic Writing.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies2 (9): 1895–1904. 10.4304/tpls.2.9.1895‑1904
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.9.1895-1904 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fairclough, Norman
    2013Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
  13. Foucault, Michel
    1972The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1975Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1978The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1980 “Truth and Power.” InPower/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–197, ed. byColin Gordon, 109–133. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1982 “The Subject and Power”. Critical Inquiry8 (4): 777–795. 10.1086/448181
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448181 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1994a “On the Government of Living.” InEthics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. byPaul Rabinow, 81–86. New York: The new Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1994b “The Will to Knowledge.” InEthics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. byPaul Rabinow, 11–16. New York: The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2003“Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Frankfurt, Harry G.
    2005On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400826537
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826537 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldman, Lisa
    2016 “Silence one Story and Another is Born: Experience of Censorship in Iran and the UK in 2010.” InGlobal Insights on Theatre Censorship, ed. byCatherine O’Leary, Diego Santos Sanchez, and Michael M. Thompson, 79–92. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gu, Xiang
    2015 “Evidentiality, Subjectivity and Ideology in the Japanese History Textbook.” Discourse & Society26 (1): 29–51. 10.1177/0957926514543225
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514543225 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanks, William F.
    2012 “Evidentiality in Social Interaction.” Pragmatics and Society3 (2): 169–180. 10.1075/ps.3.2.02for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.02for [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018Language and Communicative Practices. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429493522
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493522 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirschey Marrese, Olivia
    2021 “The Emergent Construction of Feminist Identity in Interaction.” Pragmatics31 (3): 406–429. 10.1075/prag.19004.mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19004.mar [Google Scholar]
  27. Ifantidou, Elly
    2005 “Pragmatics, Cognition and Asymmetrically Acquired Evidentials.” Pragmatics15 (4): 369–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jahani, Karina
    2000 “Expressions of Indirectivity in Spoken Modern Persian.” InEvidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, ed. byLars Johanson, and Bo Utas, 185–207. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805284.185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.185 [Google Scholar]
  29. Katouzian, Homa
    2010The Persians: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Iran. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lazard, Gilbert
    2001 “On the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics33 (3): 350–367. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00008‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00008-4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lo, Adrienne
    2004 “Evidentiality and Morality in a Korean Heritage Language School.” Pragmatics14 (2): 235–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Marsilli-Vargas, Xochitl
    2014 “Listening Genres: The Emergence of Relevance Structures through the Reception of Sound.” Journal of Pragmatics69: 42–51. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  33. Murray, Sarah E.
    2017The Semantics of Evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199681570.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199681570.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nishi, Hironori
    2018 “An Overview of the Japanese Quotative itta and itte ita.” Pragmatics28 (1): 93–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pirzadeh, Ali
    2016Iran Revisited: Exploring the Historical Roots of Culture, Economics, and Society. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑30485‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30485-4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rahimifar, Mansour, Vali Rezai, and Rezvan Motavalian
    2017 “A Functional Analysis of Present Perfect in Persian.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies7 (12): 1337–1349. 10.17507/tpls.0712.24
    https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.24 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sadighi, Firooz, and Reza Mobashshernia
    2012 “A Study of Lexical Evidentials in Modern Persian: Does Genre Matter?” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research2: 8853–8856.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Saldana, Johnny
    2016The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Shokouhi, Hossein, Clodagh Norwood, and Sadegh Soltani
    2015 “Evidential in Persian Editorials.” Discourse Studies17 (4): 449–446. 10.1177/1461445615578964
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615578964 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shokouhi, Hossein, and Mehdi Latifi
    2019 “Empowerment and Knowledge Transformation through Critical Reading and Thinking: A Case Study of Iranian University Students.” InTransformation and Empowerment through Education: Reconstructing our Relationship with Education, ed. byRaqib Chowdhury, 58–72. Milton: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shokouhi, Hossein, and Amin Zaini
    2022 “Cultural and Politico-Religious Challenges Impacting Critical Reading of Text for Iranian Postgraduates in Australia.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics45 (1): 76–97. 10.1075/aral.19082.sho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19082.sho [Google Scholar]
  42. Souleimanov, Emil
    2011 “The Evolution of Azerbaijani Identity and the Prospects of Secessionism in Iranian Azerbaijan.” Connections11 (1): 77–84. 10.11610/Connections.11.1.07
    https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.11.1.07 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wiederhold, Anna
    2015 “Conducting Fieldwork at and Away from Home: Shifting Researcher Positionality with Mobile Interviewing Methods.” Qualitative Researcher15 (5): 600–615. 10.1177/1468794114550440
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550440 [Google Scholar]
  44. Zaini, Amin
    2018 “Word Processors as Monarchs: Computer-Generated Feedback Can Exercise Power over and Influence EAL Learners’ Identity Representations.” Computers and Education120: 112–126. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zaini, Amin, and Sue Ollerhead
    2019 “Reverse Contrastive Rhetoric in Expository Writing: Transfer and Power Relations at Work.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies37 (1): 41–61. 10.2989/16073614.2019.1609364
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2019.1609364 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21029.zai
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error