@article{jbp:/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21059.pad, author = "Padilla Cruz, Manuel", title = "Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts", journal= "Pragmatics", year = "2023", volume = "33", number = "3", pages = "343-367", doi = "https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21059.pad", url = "https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21059.pad", publisher = "John Benjamins", issn = "1018-2101", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "relevance theory", keywords = "prosody", keywords = "ad hoc concepts", keywords = "free enrichment", keywords = "gestures", keywords = "lexical pragmatics", keywords = "interjections", abstract = "Abstract

Ad hoc concept construction is regarded as a case of free pragmatic enrichment, so it is presented as a non-linguistically mandated process that is automatically accomplished during mutual parallel adjustment. Recent research suggests that this lexical pragmatic process may be marked and steered by various linguistic elements. These include evaluative morphemes, lexical and phrasal items adjacent to content words, and stylistic resources like repetition or rewording. This paper argues that paralanguage may fulfil a similar enacting function and finetune the conceptual representations arising from content words on the grounds of idiosyncratic, context-dependent features or shades, as well as propositional and non-propositional information about the speaker’s psychological states. However, the paper restricts this function to expressive interjections, prosodic inputs like pitch, contrastive stress and pace or tempo, and gestural inputs such as language-like gestures, pantomimes and emblems. Conative interjections, intonation and proper gesticulation would be excluded from contributing to lexical pragmatic processes.", }