The cyclic nature of negation: From implicit to explicit

References

1. Bardenstein, Ruti
   2016 “The Hebrew Adverbial bixlal.” Entrepalavras61, 10–28, jul./dez. 10.22168/2237‑6321.6.6.2.10‑28
   https://doi.org/10.22168/2237-6321.6.6.2.10-28 [Google Scholar]
2. Bardenstein, Ruti
   2020 “Persistent Argumentative Discourse Markers. The Case of Hebrew Rectification-Marker beʕecem (‘actually’).” Journal of Pragmatics1721, 254–269. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Bardenstein, Ruti
   2022 “The Case of Question-Based Exclamatives. From Pragmatic Rhetorical Function to Semantic Meaning.” Intercultural Pragmatics19 (2): 209–232. 10.1515/ip‑2022‑2003
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-2003 [Google Scholar]
4. Bardenstein, Ruti, and Mira Ariel
   2019 “Ela (‘but’) in the Mishna and in Contemporary Hebrew (in Hebrew).” Balshanut ivrit731: 45–61.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chatzopoulou, Katerina
   2013 “Re(de)fining Jespersen’s Cycle.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics191: 31–40.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dahl, Osten
   1979 “Typology of Sentence Negation.” Linguistics171: 79–106. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1‑2.79
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79 [Google Scholar]
7. Ghezzi, Chiara, and Piera Molinelli
   2014 Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
   2014 “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: The Medieval Particle ja Between Latin iam and Modern French déjà.” InDiscourse and Pragmatic Markers. From Latin to the Romance Languages, ed. byChiara Ghezzi, and Piera Molinelli, 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
9. Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
   2015 “Phénomènes de cyclicité dans l’évolution des marqueurs pragmatiques.” Keynote talk, 4th International Symposium on Discourse Markers in Romance Languages. Heidelberg, Germany, 6–9 May.
10. Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
    2018 “Cyclicity Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers. Examples from Romance.” InBeyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, ed. bySalvador Pons Bordería, and Óscar Loureda Lamas, 51–77. Amsterdam: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gilnert, Lewish
    1982 “Negative and Non-assertive in Contemporary Hebrew.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London45 (3): 434–470. 10.1017/S0041977X00041513
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00041513 [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, Adele
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jespersen, Otto
    1917 “Negation in English and Other Languages.” Historisk-Filologiske Meddelelser11.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kadmon, Nirit, and Fred Landman
    1993 “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy16 (4): 353–422. 10.1007/BF00985272
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985272 [Google Scholar]
15. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1965 “The Evolution of Grammatical Categories.” Diogenes511: 55–71. 10.1177/039219216501305105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305105 [Google Scholar]
16. Ladusaw, William
    1996 Negation and Polarity Items. InThe Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, ed. byShalom Lappin, 321–341, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Langacker, Roland
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, Vol.11. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Langacker, Roland
    1991 “Cognitive Grammar.” InLinguistic Theory and Grammatical Description, ed. byFlip G. Droste, and John E. Joseph, 275–306. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.75.10lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.75.10lan [Google Scholar]
19. Langacker, Roland
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Lehmann, Christian
    2005 “Pleonasm and Hyper Characterisation.” InYearbook of Morphology, ed. byGeert Booij, and Jaap van Marle, 119–154. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Levi, Alissa
    2008 “Hebrew Negative Polarity Items šum and af.” InCurrent Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics, ed. bySharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon, and Susan Rothstein, 313–336. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.134.13heb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.134.13heb [Google Scholar]
22. Meillet, Antoine
    1921/1912 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales.” Scientia (Rivista di Scienza)12 (26), 130–148.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sadock, Jerry
    1971 “Queclaratives.” Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society71, 223–232.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sadock, Jerry
    1974 Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York; San Francisco; London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
    2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
26. Trousdale, Graeme
    2012 “Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Grammaticalization of Constructions.” InGrammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections, ed. byKristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems, and Tanja Mortelmans, 167–198. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.07tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.07tro [Google Scholar]
27. Traugott, Elizabeth
    1997 “Unless and But Conditionals: A Historical Perspective.” InConditionals Again, ed. byAngeliki Athenasiadou, and René Dirven, 145–167. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.09clo [Google Scholar]
28. Traugott, Elizabeth. C., and Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Trudgill, Peter
    1995 “Grammaticalisation and Social Structure: Non-standard Conjunction-Formation in East Anglian English.” InGrammar and Meaning, ed. byFrank R. Palmer, 136–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620638.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620638.008 [Google Scholar]
30. van der Auwera, Johan
    2009 “The Jespersen Cycles.” InCyclical Change, ed. byElly van Gelderen, 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146.05auw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146.05auw [Google Scholar]
31. van Gelderen, Elly
    2008 “Negative Cycles.” Linguistic Typology121: 195–243. 10.1515/LITY.2008.037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.037 [Google Scholar]
32. Ma’agarim Database (MD): The Historical Dictionary Project of the Academy of the Hebrew Language
    Ma’agarim Database (MD): The Historical Dictionary Project of the Academy of the Hebrew Language: maagarim.hebrew-academy.org.il
33. The hetenten
    The hetenten: [https://auth.sketchengine.eu/#login?next=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.sketchengine.eu%2]