1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 34, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the age of Internet communication, car sharing as well as other types of sharing (accommodation, offices, etc.) has led to the emergence of the so-called sharing economy platforms, such as BlaBlaCar. Previous studies have demonstrated that millennials (i.e., those born between 1981 and 1999) are the most representative generational cohort regarding their interests in activities organized around BlaBlaCar and similar sites (Činjarević, Kožo and Berberović 2019). One direct consequence of this fact is that the way in which millennials communicate in this particular affinity space (Gee 2005; Jenkins 2006) may be highly informative of their discursive identities (Bucholtz and Hall 2005).

Against this backdrop, this study examines 1,000 online reviews taken from www.BlablaCar.es, in order to, first, understand how millennials conceptualize their experiences in BlaBlaCar; second, examine how identity emerges through labels and implicatures (Bucholtz and Hall 2005); and third, discuss and understand the relationship between the discourse identity shaped in BlaBlaCar reviews and millennials’ social identity. The findings reveal that BlaBlaCar reviews are highly informative of users’ identities and their relational needs. Also, these reviews no longer comply with traditional definitions of ‘consumer reviews’, and a re-conceptualization is needed.

© 2024 International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21066.her
2023-04-25
2024-12-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.21066.her
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Black, Alison
    2010 “Gen Y: Who They Are and How They Learn”. Educational Horizons88 (2): 92–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Botsman, Rachel, and Roo Rogers
    2011 What’s Mine Is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption Is Changing the Way We Live. Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brewer, Marilyn B., and Wendy Gardner
    1996 “Who Is This ‘‘We’’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71 (1): 83–93. 10.1037/0022‑3514.71.1.83
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridges, Judith, and Camilla Vásquez
    2018 “If Nearly All Airbnb Reviews Are Positive, Does That Make Them Meaningless?” Current Issues in Tourism21 (18): 2057–2075. 10.1080/13683500.2016.1267113
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1267113 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper
    2000 “Beyond ‘Identity’”. Theory and Society29 (1): 1–47. 10.1023/A:1007068714468
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies7 (4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cenni, Irene, and Camilla Vásquez
    2020 “Airbnb’s Food-Related ‘Online Experiences’: A Recipe for Connection and Escape”. Food and Foodways, Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment29 (1): 97–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Činjarević, Merima, Amra Kožo, and Denis Berberović
    2019 “Sharing Is Caring, and Millenials Do Care: Collaborative Consumptions Through the Eyes of the Internet Generation”. South East European Journal of Economics and Business14 (1): 49–60. 10.2478/jeb‑2019‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubé, Line, Anne Bourhis, and Réal Jacob
    2005 “The Impact of Structuring Characteristics on the Launching of Virtual Communities of Practice”. Journal of Organizational Change Management18 (2): 145–166. 10.1108/09534810510589570
     https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510589570 [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Bois, John W.
    2002 “Stance and Consequence”. InThe Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ert, Eyal, Aliza Fleischer, and Nathan Magen
    2016 “Trust and Reputation in the Sharing Economy: The Role of Personal Photos in Airbnb”. Tourism Management551: 62–73. 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Farajallah, Mehdi, Robert G. Hammond, and Thierry Pénard
    2019 “What Drives Pricing Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Markets? Evidence from the Carsharing Platform BlaBlaCar”. Information Economics and Policy48 (C): 15–31. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2019.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2019.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2019 “Introduction to Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions”. InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatricia Bou Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 3–22. Switzerland: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Alex Georgakopoulou
    2021 “Analyzing Identity”. InHandbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. byMichael Haugh, Daniel Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 293–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.017
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.017 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee, James Paul
    2004 Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2005 “Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From the Age of Mythology to Today’s Schools”. InBeyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, ed. byDavid Barton, and Karin Tusting, 214–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012 [Google Scholar]
  18. Godelnik, Raz
    2017 “Millennials and the Sharing Economy: Lessons from a ‘Buy Nothing New, Share Everything Month’ Project”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions231: 40–52. 10.1016/j.eist.2017.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Guyader, Hugo
    2018 “No One Rides for Free! Three Styles in Collaborative Consumption”. Journal of Services Marketing32 (6): 692–714. 10.1108/JSM‑11‑2016‑0402
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2016-0402 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hardy, Anne, Sara Dolnicar, and Oscar Vorobjovas-Pinta
    2021 “The Formation and Functioning of the Airbnb Neo-Tribe. Exploring Peer-to-Peer Accommodation Host Groups”. Tourism Management Perspectives371: 100760. 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100760
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100760 [Google Scholar]
  21. Head, Lee Ann
    2013 “Will Millennials Drive the Shift from a Consumption-based to a Values-based Economy?” www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/behavior_change/will-millennials-drive-shift-consumption-basedvaluesbased-economy (accessedSeptember 3, 2018).
  22. Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin Gwinner, Gianfranco Walsh, and Dwayne Gremler
    2004 “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing18 (1): 38–52. 10.1002/dir.10073
     https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hernández-López, María de la O.
    2019 “What Makes a Positive Experience? Offline/online Communication and Rapport Enhancement in Airbnb Positive Reviews”. Pragmatics and Society10 (2): 179–206. 10.1075/ps.16060.ohe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16060.ohe [Google Scholar]
  24. 2022 “When Travellers’ Expectations Are Not Met. Rapport Management in Airbnb Online Consumer Reviews with Negative Valence”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict10 (2): 241–268. 10.1075/jlac.00041.her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00041.her [Google Scholar]
  25. Herring, Susan
    2004 “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior”. InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service Learning, ed. bySasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James Hay, 338–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  26. Herring, Susan C.
    (2019) “The Coevolution of Computer-mediated Communication and Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis”. InAnalyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. byPatrica Bou Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 25–68. Switzerland: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hwang, Jiyoung, and Merlyn Griffiths
    2017 “Share More, Drive Less: Millennials Value Perception and Behavioral Intent in Using Collaborative Consumption Services”. Journal of Consumer Marketing34 (2): 132–146. 10.1108/JCM‑10‑2015‑1560
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2015-1560 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins, Henry
    2006 Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kruger, Martinette, and Melville Saayman
    2015 “Music Preferences of Generation Y: Evidence from Live Music Performances in South Africa”. Journal of Vacation Marketing21 (4): 1–17. 10.1177/1356766715585903
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766715585903 [Google Scholar]
  30. Marwick, Alice and dana boyd
    2011 “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience”. New Media & Society13 (1): 114–133. 10.1177/1461444810365313
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mazella, Frédéric, and Arun Sundaranjan
    2016 “Entering the Trust Age”. Retrieved from: https://blog.blablacar.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/entering-the-trust-age.pdf
  32. Morton, Lee
    2002 “Targeting Generation Y”. Public Relations Quarterly47 (2): 46–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mudambi, Susan, and David Schuff
    2010 “What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Consumer Reviews on Amazon.com”. MIS Quarterly34 (1): 185–200. 10.2307/20721420
     https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420 [Google Scholar]
  34. Page, Ruth
    2012 Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. Oxford: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Patton, Michael
    2014 Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Prensky, Marc
    2001 “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants”. On the Horizon9 (5): 1–6. 10.1108/10748120110424816
     https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rainer, Tom, and Jess Rainer
    2011 The Millennials: Connecting to America’s Largest Generation. New York: Lifeway Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sherblom, John
    2010 “The Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Classroom: A Challenge of Medium, Presence, Interaction, Identity, and Relationship”. Communication Education59 (4): 497–523. 10.1080/03634523.2010.486440
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.486440 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schroer, William
    2008 “Generations X, Y, Z and the Others”. The Portal40 (9). Retrieved fromiam.files.cms-plus.com/newimages/portalpdfs/2008_03_04.pdf (accessedSeptember 1, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Vásquez, Camilla
    2011 “Complaints Online: The Case of Tripadvisor”. Journal of Pragmatics43(6): 1707–1717. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014 The Discourse of Online Consumer Reviews. Bloomsbury Discourse Series. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Venter, Elza
    2017 “Bridging the Communication Gap between Generation Y and the Baby Boomer Generation”. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth22 (4): 497–507. 10.1080/02673843.2016.1267022
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1267022 [Google Scholar]
  43. Virtanen, Tuija
    2017 “Adaptability in Online Consumer Reviews: Exploring Genre Dynamics and Interactional Choices”. Journal of Pragmatics1111: 77–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, Melissa, Elliroma Gardiner, Whitney Lang, and Leah Coulon
    2008 “Generational Differences in Personality and Motivation: Do They Exist and What Are the Implications for the Workplace?” Journal of Managerial Psychology23 (8): 878–890. 10.1108/02683940810904376
     https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904376 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wortham, Stanton
    2010 Learning Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus
    2017 “An Internet Dialogue on Internet Pragmatics”. Foreign Language and Literature Studies34 (2): 75–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Yus, Francisco
    2014 “El discurso de las identidades en línea: el caso de Facebook”. Discurso y Sociedad8 (3): 398–426.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 [Google Scholar]
  49. Yus, Franscisco
    2022 Smartphone Communication. Interactions in the App Ecosystem. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Zervas, Georgios, Davide Proserpio, and John Byers
    2014 “The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry”. Working Paper. Boston: Boston University. Retrieved frompeople.bu.edu/zg/publications/airbnb.pdf
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21066.her
Loading
Millennial identity work in BlablaCar online reviews
Pragmatics 34, 134 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21066.her
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21066.her
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21066.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): BlaBlaCar; discursive identity; identities-in-interaction; implicatures; millennials; sharing economy

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error