oa On the manifestness of assumptions

References

1. Blakemore, Diane
   2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
2. Bonalumi, Francesca, Thom Scott-Phillips, Julius Tacha, and Christophe Heintz
   2020 “Commitment and Communication: Are We Committed to What We Mean, or What We Say?” Language and Cognition12 (2): 360–384. 10.1017/langcog.2020.2
   https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.2 [Google Scholar]
3. Boulat, Kira
   2018 “It’s All about Strength: Testing a Pragmatic Model of Commitment.” PhD dissertation. University of Fribourg.
4. Boulat, Kira, and Didier Maillat
   2023 “Strength is Relevant: Experimental Evidence of Strength as a Marker of Commitment.” Frontiers in Communication81. 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176845
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176845 [Google Scholar]
5. Boulat, Kira, and Didier Maillat
   . 2023. “Strength is Relevant: Experimental Evidence of Strength as a Marker of Commitment.” Frontiers in Communication81. 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176845
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176845 [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Billy
   2013 Relevance Theory. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139034104
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104 [Google Scholar]
7. Culioli, Antoine
   1971 “Modalité.” Encyclopédie Alpha, vol.101. Paris: Grange Batelière and Novare: Istitutogeografico de Agostini, 40311.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dezecache, Guillaume, Pierre Jacob, and Julie Grèzes
   2015 “Emotional Contagion: Its Scope and Limits.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences19 (6): 297–299. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.011 [Google Scholar]
9. Dezecache, Guillaume, Hugo Mercier, and Thom Scott-Phillips
   2013 “An Evolutionary Approach to Emotional Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics591: 221–233. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.007 [Google Scholar]
10. Ducrot, Oswald
    1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grice, H. Paul
    1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ifantidou, Elly
    2001 Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.86
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.86 [Google Scholar]
13. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
14. Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck, and Hugo Mercier
    2018 “Saying, Presupposing and Implicating: How Pragmatics Modulates Commitment.” Journal of Pragmatics1331: 15–27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009 [Google Scholar]
15. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber
    2017 The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Moeschler, Jacques
    2009 “Pragmatics, Propositional and Non-Propositional Effects: Can a Theory of Utterance Interpretation Account for Emotions in Verbal Communication?” Social Science Information48 (3): 447–464. 10.1177/0539018409106200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409106200 [Google Scholar]
17. Moeschler, Jacques
    2013 “Is a Speaker-Based Pragmatics Possible? Or How Can a Hearer Infer a Speaker’s Commitment?” Journal of Pragmatics481: 84–97. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.019 [Google Scholar]
18. Morency, Patrick, Steve Oswald, and Louis de Saussure
    2008 “Explicitness, Implicitness and Commitment Attribution: A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” Commitment, ed. byPhilippe de Brabanter, and Patrick Dendale, 197–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Saussure, Louis de, and Tim Wharton
    2020 “Relevance, Effects and Affect.” International Review of Pragmatics121: 183–205. 10.1163/18773109‑01202001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202001 [Google Scholar]
20. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language25 (4): 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
21. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    2015 “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy151: 117–149.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wharton, Tim
    2009 Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649 [Google Scholar]
24. Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander, and Steve Oswald
    2021 “Relevance and Emotion.” Journal of Pragmatics1811: 259–269. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001 [Google Scholar]
25. Wharton, Tim, and Claudia Strey
    2019 “Slave of the Passions: Making Emotions Relevant.” InRelevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. byKate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 253–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.022 [Google Scholar]
26. Wilson, Deirdre
    2011 “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” InProcedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. byVictoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3–31. Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1108/S1472‑7870(2011)0000025005
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1472-7870(2011)0000025005 [Google Scholar]
27. Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
    2004 “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” InPragmatics, ed. byNoel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
    2019 “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-Propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics1451: 31–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
29. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]