1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This study takes up the current debate on natural versus elicited data in investigations on speech acts by comparing both types of data in a particular context, that of asking for and giving driving directions. An analysis of route-descriptions offered by male and female direction-givers in both natural and role-play settings revealed only one statistically significant sex-related difference: More male than female participants included mileage estimates in the natural setting but not in the role-play setting. However, when male and female participants’ responses were combined to compare natural with role-play direction-giving, the role-play participants exhibited several significantly different linguistic behaviors in terms of their use of verbal devices (e.g., landmarks, mileage estimates, stoplight estimates) throughout the interactional phases. Direction-givers, when acting in an authentic context that carries real-world consequences, unanimously recognized an indirect request for directions while the direction-givers in the role-play setting generally did not. Additionally, this study revealed that the cognitive behaviors and the conventionalization evident in “natural” direction-giving were lacking in the role-play exchanges. Finally, the role-play participants were generally more aware of their role as research participants than as direction-givers, an awareness that affected their linguistic behaviors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.1.03ewa
2012-01-01
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, Gary L.
    (2000) Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology14: 333–359. doi: 10.1002/1099‑0720(200007/08)14:4<333::AID‑ACP655>3.0.CO;2‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<333::AID-ACP655>3.0.CO;2-C [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Rachel E. , Alistair J. Gill , and Justine Cassell
    (2008) Reactive redundancy and listener comprehension in direction-giving. Proceedings of SIGDIAL, June 19–20, Columbus, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beebe, Leslie
    (1994) Notebook data on power and the power of notebook data. Paper presented atthe annual TESOL Conference, March, Baltimore, MD.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beebe, Leslie , M. Cummings , and Martha Clark
    (1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M. Gass , N. Joyce (eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.65–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Leonora N. , Cindy J. Lahar , and James L. Mosley
    (1998) Age and gender-related differences in strategy use for route information: A “map-present” direction-giving paradigm. Environment and Behavior30.2: 123–143. doi: 10.1177/0013916598302001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598302001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, Andrew D.
    (1996) Investigating the production of speech act sets. In S.M. Gass , J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Collett, Peter , and Gregory O’Shea
    (1976) Pointing the way to a fictional place: A study of direction giving in Iran and England. European Journal of Social Psychology6.4: 447–458. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420060404
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420060404 [Google Scholar]
  8. Couclelis, Helen
    (1996) Verbal directions for way-finding: Space, cognition, and language. In J. Portugali (ed.), The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Alphen a. Rijn: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.133–153. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑585‑33485‑1_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulmas, Florian
    (1981) Introduction: Conversational Routine. In F. Coulmas , (ed.), Conversational Routine. Berlin: Mouton Publishers, pp.1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Demeter, Gusztav
    (2007) Role-plays as a data collection method for research on apology speech acts. Simulation and Gaming38.1: 83–90. doi: 10.1177/1046878106297880
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878106297880 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ewald, Jennifer
    (2010) “Do you know where X is?”: Direction-giving and male/female direction-givers. Journal of Pragmatics42.9: 2549–2561. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    (2003) Validity in data collection methods in pragmatics research. In P. Kempchinsky , and C.E. Piñeros (eds.), Theory, Practice, and Acquisition. Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp.239–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Félix-Brasdefer, J.César
    (2007) Natural speech vs. elicited data. Spanish in Context4.2: 159–185. doi: 10.1075/sic.4.2.03fel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.03fel [Google Scholar]
  14. Golding, Jonathan M. , Arthur C. Graesser , and Jerry Hauselt
    (1996) The process of answering direction-giving questions when someone is lost on a university campus: The role of pragmatics. Applied Cognitive Psychology10: 23–39. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0720(199602)10:1<23::AID‑ACP357>3.0.CO;2‑H
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199602)10:1<23::AID-ACP357>3.0.CO;2-H [Google Scholar]
  15. Grice, H. Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole , and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harrell, W. Andrew , Jeffrey W. Bowlby , and Deana Hall-Hoffarth
    (2000) Direction wayfinders with maps: The effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. The Journal of Social Psychology140.2: 169–178. doi: 10.1080/00224540009600456
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600456 [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris, Lauren Julius
    (1981) Sex-related variations in spatial skill. In L. Liben , N. Newcombe , and A. Paterson (eds.), Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span. New York: Academic Press, pp.83–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartford, Beverly S. , and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig
    (1992) Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning3: 33–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jung, Euen Hyuk (Sarah)
    (2004) Interlanguage pragmatics: Apology speech acts. In C.L. Moder , and A. Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.99–116. doi: 10.1075/slcs.68.06jun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.68.06jun [Google Scholar]
  20. Kasper, Gabriele , and Merete Dahl
    (1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition13: 215–247. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100009955
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009955 [Google Scholar]
  21. Klein, Wolfgang
    (1982) Local deixis in route directions. In R.J. Jarvella , and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. PLACE: John Wiley and Sons, pp.161–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lawton, Carol A.
    (2001) Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles44.5-6: 321–337. doi: 10.1023/A:1010981616842
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010981616842 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mark, David M. , and Michael D. Gould
    (1995) Wayfinding directions as discourse: Verbal directions in English and Spanish. In J.F. Duchan , G.A. Bruder , and L.E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.387–405.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, Leon K. , and Viana Santoni
    (1986) Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and experiential correlates. Acta Psychologica62.3: 225–235. doi: 10.1016/0001‑6918(86)90089‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(86)90089-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Napoleon, Siena
    (2007) From here to there: A sociolinguistic study in gender and direction-giving. Indiana Undergraduate Journal of Cognitive Science2: 18–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pearson, Bethyl A. , and K. Samuel Lee
    (1992) Discourse structure of direction giving: Effects of native/nonnative speaker status and gender. TESOL Quarterly26.1: 113–127. doi: 10.2307/3587371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587371 [Google Scholar]
  27. Psathas, George
    (1986) Some sequential structures in direction-giving. Human Studies9: 231–246. doi: 10.1007/BF00148129
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148129 [Google Scholar]
  28. Psathas, George , and Martin Kozloff
    (1976) The structure of directions. Semiotica17.2: 111–130. doi: 10.1515/semi.1976.17.2.111
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1976.17.2.111 [Google Scholar]
  29. Scotton, Carol M. , and Janice Bernsten
    (1988) Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics9.4: 372–384. doi: 10.1093/applin/9.4.372
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.4.372 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ward, Shawn L. , Nora Newcombe , and Willis F. Overton
    (1986) Turn left at the church, or three miles north: a study of direction giving and sex differences. Environment and Behavior18.2: 192–213. doi: 10.1177/0013916586182003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586182003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wunderlich, Dieter , and Rudolph Reinelt
    (1982) How to get there from here. In R.J. Jarvella , and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. PLACE: John Wiley and Sons, pp.183–201.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.1.03ewa
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Direction-giving , Elicited data , Natural data , Role-play , Route-descriptions and Verbal devices
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error