The interplay between professional identities and age, gender and ethnicity
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Gender and professional identity are intertwined particularly in professions where women are underrepresented, making gender identities and professional identities simultaneously relevant. A promising area for inquiry into identity construction (and one where the effect of actions to increase the proportion of women in professions such as engineering can potentially be observed) is graduate recruitment, a process designed to put novice professional identities to the test. This paper takes a social constructionist approach in exploring the discursive negotiation of female engineers’ professional identities and how these are co-constructed dynamically in interaction with gender identities in this important gatekeeping context. The analysis, which draws on examples from a dataset of 20 naturally occurring interviews between employers and final-year undergraduates at a university in New Zealand, focuses particularly on the interplay of gender in the necessary synthesis of personal and institutional discourses in constructing a professional identity. Ways in which gender is oriented to explicitly and/or implicitly in these gatekeeping encounters are shown to resonate with existing gender divisions (technical vs relational) in the androcentric professional context of engineering, undermining a pro-women recruitment stance. Central to the validation of professional identities by interviewers was the demonstration of “passion for engineering” but ways in which it was deemed to be demonstrated, such as through reasons for career choice and outside interests, were arguably gender-circumscribed. This further set of normative expectations, on top of the existing competency-discourse-driven requirement to fit candidates into prescribed categories, contributes invisibly to maintaining the homogeneous identity of the engineering profession. The tension between conflicting requirements for “difference” and “sameness” in the professional identities of female engineers is highlighted in a discussion of the ways gender is made relevant in the co-construction of these identities.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bergvall, V.L.
    (1996) Constructing and enacting gender through discourse: Negotiating multiple roles as female engineering students. In V.L. Bergvall , J.M. Bing , and A.F. Freed (eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice. London: Longman, pp.173–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Billig, M. , S. Condor , D. Edwards , M. Crane , D. Middleton , and A. Radley
    (1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bucholtz, M. , and K. Hall
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7.4-5: 585–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, M.
    (2004) Styles and stereotypes: The linguistic negotiation of identity among Laotian American youth. Pragmatics14.2/3: 127–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, S. , and C. Roberts
    (2007) Migration, ethnicity and competing discourses in the job interview: Synthesizing the institutional and personal. Discourse & Society18.5: 243–271. doi: 10.1177/0957926507075474
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075474 [Google Scholar]
  6. Champy, J.
    (1995) Re-engineering management: The mandate for new leadership. New York: Harper Business.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Fina, A.
    (2003) Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sin.3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sin.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dick, P. , and S. Nadin
    (2006) Reproducing gender inequalities? A critique of realist assumptions underpinning personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology79.3: 481–498. doi: 10.1348/096317905X68709
    https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X68709 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dryburgh, H.
    (1999) Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering: Adapting to the culture. Gender and Society13.5: 664–682. doi: 10.1177/089124399013005006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013005006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eckert, P. , and S. McConnell-Ginet
    (1992a) Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, April 4–5 1992, 89–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1992b) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 461–490. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evetts, J.
    (1996) Gender and career in science and engineering. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, N.
    (2000) Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics4.2: 163–195. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00110
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00110 [Google Scholar]
  14. Faulkner, W.
    (2007) ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science37.3: 331–356. doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706072175 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fletcher, J.K.
    (1999) Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee, J. , C. Lankshear , and G.A. Hull
    (1996) The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gumperz, J.
    (1992) Interviewing in intercultural situations. In P. Drew , and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.302–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halford, S. , and P. Leonard
    (2006) Negotiating gendered identities at work. Basingstoke: Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230502710
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502710 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hawthorne, L.
    (1992) Migrant engineers’ job interview performance: A cross cultural analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics15.2: 90–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. He, A.W.
    (1995) Co-constructing institutional identities: The case of student counselees. Research on Language and Social Interaction28.3: 213–231. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Holmes, J.
    (2006) Gendered talk at work. Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Malden MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Iedema, R.
    (2003) Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ddcs.5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.5 [Google Scholar]
  23. IPENZ
    (2010) Minority groups in education. Report prepared for the National Engineering Education Plan Project. Wellington: IPENZ. Available atwww.ipenz.org.nz/ipenz/Education_Career/Report_Minority_Groups_in_Engineering.pdf
  24. (2011) The retention and renewal of women in engineering: An IPENZ Plan to encourage diversity in and sustainability of the engineering profession. Wellington: IPENZ. Available atwww.ipenz.org.nz/ipenz/downloads/RetentionRenewal_WIE.pdf
  25. Jacoby, S. , and E. Ochs
    (1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction28.3: 171–183. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jagacinski, C.M.
    (1987) Engineering careers: Women in a male-dominated field. Psychology of Women Quarterly11.1: 97–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1471‑6402.1987.tb00777.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00777.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Jagacinski, C.M. , and W.K. LeBold
    (1981) A comparison of men and women undergraduate and professional engineers. Engineering Education72.3: 213–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaffe, A.
    (ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jenkins, R.
    (2004) Social identity. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203463352
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463352 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, D.
    (2004)  Screwing diversity out of the workers? Reading diversity. Journal of Organizational Change17.3: 281–291. doi: 10.1108/09534810410538333
    https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410538333 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kerekes, J.A.
    (2006) Winning an interviewer’s trust in a gatekeeping encounter. Language in Society35.1: 27–57. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060027 [Google Scholar]
  32. Koller, V.
    (2004) Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511286
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286 [Google Scholar]
  33. Küskü, F. , M. Özbilgin , and L. Özkale
    (2007) Against the tide: Gendered prejudice and disadvantage in engineering. Gender, Work & Organization14.2: 109–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0432.2007.00335.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00335.x [Google Scholar]
  34. MacLachlan, M. , S. Forsyth , and L. Cassells
    (1992) Job winning in New Zealand. Auckland, N.Z.: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McCarthy, M.
    (2003) Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction36.1: 33–63. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_3 [Google Scholar]
  36. McElhinny, B.
    (1995) Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In K. Hall , and M. Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York: Routledge, pp.217–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nentwich, J.C.
    (2006) Changing gender: The discursive construction of equal opportunities. Gender, Work & Organization13.6: 499–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0432.2006.00320.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00320.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Oakley, B. , R.M. Felder , R. Brent , and I. Elhajj
    (2004) Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning2.1: 9–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ochs, E.
    (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction26.3: 287–306. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ozbilgin, M.F. , and D. Woodward
    (2004) Belonging and otherness: Sex equality in banking in Turkey and Britain. Gender, Work and Organization11.6: 668–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0432.2004.00254.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00254.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Pawley, A.L.
    (2008, July) Work in progress: Engineering identity markers in faculty members. Paper presented atthe Research in Engineering Education Symposium . Davos, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Powell, A. , B. Bagilhole , and A. Dainty
    (2009) Women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work & Organization16.4: 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0432.2008.00406.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Reissner-Roubicek, S.
    (2010) Communicative strategies in the behavioural job interview: The influence of discourse norms on graduate recruitment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Auckland.
  44. Roberts, C. , and S. Campbell
    (2005) Fitting stories into boxes: Rhetorical and textual constraints on candidates’ performances in British job interviews. Journal of Applied Linguistics2.1: 45–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2006) Talk on trial: Job interviews, language and ethnicity. DWP Research Report No. Available atstatistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2005-2006/rrep344.pdf
  46. Roberts, C. , and S. Sarangi
    (1999) Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In S. Sarangi , and C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.473–503. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375 [Google Scholar]
  47. Robinson, J.G. , and J.S. McIllwee
    (1991) Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly32.3: 403–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1533‑8525.1991.tb00166.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00166.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharp, R. , S. Franzway , J. Mills , and J. Gill
    (2011) Flawed policy, failed politics? Challenging the sexual politics of managing diversity in engineering organizations. Gender, Work & Organization. Article first published online: 20January, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shepherd, D.M. , and J.K. Pringle
    (2004) Resistance to organizational culture change: A gendered analysis. In R. Thomas , A. J. Mills , and J. Helms Mills (eds.), Identity politics at work: Resisting gender, gendering resistance. Oxford/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stonyer, H.
    (2002) Making engineering students - making women: The discursive context of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, Special Issue on Women in Engineering18.4: 392–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Stubbe, M. , C. Lane , J. Hilder , E. Vine , B. Vine , and M. Marra
    (2003) Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies5.3: 351–388. doi: 10.1177/14614456030053004
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614456030053004 [Google Scholar]
  52. Takruri-Rizk, H. , K. Jensen , and K. Booth
    (2006) Experiences of engineering students: Is Gender an issue?Paper presented atthe Education in a Changing Environment Conference , University of Salford. Available atwww.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/ht_06.rtf
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tonso, K.
    (2007) On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. The University of Auckland
    (2011, July12) Engineering rewarding for women. Retrieved fromwww.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/home/template/news_item.jsp?cid=405333
  55. Young, A. , and D. Hurlic
    (2007) Gender enactment at work: The importance of gender and gender-related behavior to person-organizational fit and career decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology22: 2: 168–187. doi: 10.1108/02683940710726429
    https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710726429 [Google Scholar]
  56. Van de Mieroop, D.
    (2007) The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of institutional and professional identity. Journal of Pragmatics39.6: 1120–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wagner, I. , and R. Wodak
    (2006) Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse & Society17.3: 385–411. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060251
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060251 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error