1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Disclaimers are generally defined as devices employed to ward off and defeat doubts and negative typifications which may result from intended conduct (Hewitt & Stokes 1975). In academic prose, writers also take advantage of disclaimers to remove any probable infelicities that could occur as a result of their research or language choices in an attempt to promote the precision and persuasive power of their text. In order to develop a clearer understanding of disclaiming in research articles (RAs), a sample of 120 RAs was selected to identify and discuss different types of disclaimers. The qualitative analysis of the corpus led to introduce six disjunctive types of disclaimers employed by writers of RAs: o vs, vs. , vs, vs. , vs. , and vs. . Each has been discussed with reference to authentic examples from various journals. Furthermore, a list of formal varieties is developed along with an opinion of what they typically target and where they tend to occur. The paper concludes with a definition of disclaimers in RAs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.01abd
2012-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdi, Reza
    (2002) Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies4.2: 139–145. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040020101
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020101 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2009) The distribution and nature of metadiscourse markers in English and Persian research articles. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Isfahan: Isfahan University.
  3. Abdi, Reza , Manoochehr T. Rizi , and Mansoor Tavakoli
    (2010) The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics42: 1669–1679. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ädel, Annelie
    (2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadel phia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/scl.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, Robert , Christopher J. Zahn , and Robert Hopper
    (1984) Disclaiming: A test of two competing views. Communication Quarterly32: 28–36. doi: 10.1080/01463378409369528
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378409369528 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, Douglas , and Edward Finegan
    (1988) Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes11: 1–34. doi: 10.1080/01638538809544689
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen Levinson
    (1978) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crismore, Avon
    (1989) Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahl, Trine
    (2008) Contributing to the academic conversation: A study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1184–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dodge, Tonya , and Annette Kaufman
    (2007) What makes consumers think dietary supplements are safe and effective? The role of disclaimers and FDA approval. Health Psychology26.4: 513–517. doi: 10.1037/0278‑6133.26.4.513
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.513 [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Alayli, Amani , Christoffer J. Myers , Tamara L. Petersen , and Amy L. Lystad
    (2008) “I don’t mean to sound arrogant, but …” The effects of using disclaimers on person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34: 130–143. doi: 10.1177/0146167207309200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309200 [Google Scholar]
  12. Erickson, Bonnie , E. Allan Lind , Bruce C. Johnson , and William M. O’Barr
    (1978) Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology14: 266–279. doi: 10.1016/0022‑1031(78)90015‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90015-X [Google Scholar]
  13. Guinda, Carmen S.
    (2003) Contractual role of modality as convergence strategy in technical research articles. RESLA16: 219–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hewitt, John P. , and Randal Stokes
    (1975) Disclaimers. American Sociological Review40: 1–11. doi: 10.2307/2094442
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094442 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland, Ken
    (1998) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics30: 437–455. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00009‑5
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies7.2: 173–192. doi: 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2007) Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics28.2: 266–285. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2010) Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication27.2: 159–188. doi: 10.1177/0741088309357846
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyland, Ken , and Polly Tse
    (2004) Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics25.2: 156–177. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jurinski, James John
    (2005) Disclaimers of real estate in estate planning. Real Estate Taxation32.2: 87–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
    (2005) Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes24: 269–292. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Koutsantoni, Dimitra
    (2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes5: 19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Overstreet, Maryann , and George Yule
    (2001) Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics33: 45–60. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00125‑3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00125-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Salager-Meyer, Francoise
    (1994) Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes13.2: 149–171. doi: 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarangi, Srikant
    (2002) The language of likelihood in genetic counseling discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology21.1: 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0261927X02021001002
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02021001002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Silver, Mark
    (2003) The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes2.4: 359–374. doi: 10.1016/S1475‑1585(03)00051‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00051-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vande Kopple, William J.
    (1985) Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication36: 82–93. doi: 10.2307/357609
    https://doi.org/10.2307/357609 [Google Scholar]
  28. Varttala, Teppo
    (1999) Remarks on the communicative function of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. Journal of English for Specific Purposes18.2: 177–200. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00007‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6 [Google Scholar]
  29. Vassileva, Irena
    (2001) Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes20: 83–102. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00029‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wicks, John Leblanc , Ron Warren , Ignatius Fosu , and Robert Wicks
    (2009) Dual-modality disclaimers, emotional appeals, and production techniques in food advertising airing during programs rated for children. Is there a good balance?Journal of Advertising38.4: 93–105. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091‑3367380407
    https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380407 [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams, Ian A.
    (1999) Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes18: 347–366. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00003‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00003-9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams, Joseph M.
    (1981) Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zarei, Golamreza , and Sara Mansoori
    (2007) Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles. The Asian ESP Journal3.2: 24–40.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.01abd
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Academic writing , Disclaimers , Metadiscourse , Propositions and Quality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error