1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This study aims firstly to compare the complaints of local native-Malay speakers and expatriate native-English speakers in Brunei in terms of move structure and levels of directness combined with the frequency of modality markers; and secondly, it attempts to address the relationship between polite behaviour and its effectiveness in eliciting the appropriate response from the hearer. Data from an oral discourse completion task show interesting similarities and differences in the complaint move structure between the two groups of speakers. Superficially, there appears to be no significant difference between the two sets of complaints in terms of levels of directness, but a detailed analysis shows each group employing different mitigating strategies to minimise the force of a complaint. Furthermore, responses from an acceptability judgement questionnaire indicate that being indirect, and therefore polite, may not be effective in eliciting the appropriate response to a request for action in a complaint speech act.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.03ho
2012-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beebe, L.M. , and M.C. Cummings
    (1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S.M. Gass , and J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.65–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Billmyer, K. , and M. Varghese
    (2000) Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability. Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics21: 517–552. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.4.517
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.517 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    (1989) Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka , J. House , and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. New Jersey: Ablex, pp.37–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P. , and S.C. Levinson
    (1978) Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomenom. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.256–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, P. , and S. C. Levinson
    (1987) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Grundy (ed.), Questions of politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.56–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P. , and S.C. Levinson
    (1989) Politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, P. , and S.C Levinson
    (1999) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds.), The discourse reader. London: Routledge, pp.321–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crookes, Graham
    (1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics7: 57–70. doi: 10.1093/applin/7.1.57
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  9. Edmonson, W. , and J. House
    (1981) Let’s talk and talk about it. Munchen: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Elias, Nobert
    (1977) Über den Prozß der. Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eslami-Rasekh, Zohreh
    (2004) Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asia Pacific Communication14: 181–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gagne, N. Okura
    (2010) Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese sociolinguistics politeness of request. Language and Communication30: 123–138. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, Erving
    (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Golato, Andrea
    (2003) Studying complaint responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics24.1: 90–121. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.1.90
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.90 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gordon, D. , and R. Lakoff
    (1975) Conversational postulates. In P. Cole , and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haji Hamdan Hassan , Haji Abdul Hakim bin Haji MohdYassin , Abdul Hamid bin Haji Jaluddin , Haji Harun Mat Piah , Hajah Isma NasrulKarim , Lufti Abas , A. Mani
    , And Palaniappan Periannan (eds.) (1991) Forms of Courtesy in BruneiDarussalam. Department of Malay Literature, University of Brunei Darussalam.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haverkate, Henk
    (1984) Speech acts speakers and hearers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pb.v.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.4 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1992) Deictic categories as mitigating devices. Pragmatics2: 505–522.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Henry, A. , and D.G.E. Ho
    (2010) The act of complaining in Brunei – then and now. Journal of Pragmatics42.3: 840–855. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.011
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. House, Julianne
    (1989) “On excuse me please…” apologising in a foreign language. In B. Kettleman , P. Bierbaumer , A. Fill , and A. Karpf (eds.), English a/s Zweitsprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. House, J. , and G. Kasper
    (1981) Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Converstional routine: Explorations in standardised communication situations and pre-patterened speech. The Hague: Mouton, pp.159-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kasper, Gabrielle
    (1989) Variation in interlanguage speech act realization. In S.M. Gass , C.G. Madden , D. Preston , and L. Selinker (eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: discourse and pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasper, G. , and M. Dahl
    (1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100009955
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009955 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kong, C.C. Kenneth
    (1998) Politeness of service counters in Hong Kong. Pragmatics8.4: 555–575.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Laforest, Marty
    (2002) Scenes of family life: complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1595–1620. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00077‑2
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00077-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leech, Geoffrey
    (1977) Language and tact. Trier: L.A.U.T. paper46.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics12: 403–426. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mulamba, Kashama
    (2009) Social beliefs for the realization of the speech acts of apology and complaint as defined in Ciluba, French and English. Pragmatics19.4: 543–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nassaji, H. , and A. Cumming
    (2000) What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research4.2: 95–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Murphy, B. , and J. Neu
    (1996) My grade’s too low: The speech act set of complaining. In S.M. Gass , and J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.191-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (1999) Situated politeness: Manipulating honorific and non-honorifc expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics9.1: 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Olshtain, E. , and L. Weinbach
    (1993) Interlangauge features of the speech act of complaining. In G. Kasper , and S. Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.108–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Olshtain, E. , and A.D. Cohen
    (1983) Apology: A speech act set. In N. Wolfson , and E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, M.A.: Newbury House, pp.103–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Parvaresh, V. , and M. Tavakoli
    (2009) Discourse completion tasks as elicitation tools: How convergent are they?The Social Sciences4.4: 366–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pinto, D. , and R. Raschio
    (2007) A comparative study of requests in heritage speaker Spanish, L1 Spanish and L1 English. International Journal of Bilingualism11.2: 135–155. doi: 10.1177/13670069070110020101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110020101 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rintell, E.M. , and C.J. Mitchell
    (1989) Studying requests and apologies: an inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka , J. House , and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. New Jersey: Ablex, pp.248–272.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rose, R. Kenneth
    (1994) On the validity of discourse completion tests in non- western contexts. Applied Linguistics15: 1–14. doi: 10.1093/applin/15.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Scollon, R. , and S.W. Scollon
    (1995).Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Swales, John
    (1981) Aspects of article introductions. Aston ESP Research report No. 1, Language Studies Unit, University of Aston in Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Taguchi, Naoko
    (2006) Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in English. Pragmatics16.4: 513–533
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tatsuki, Donna Hurst
    (2000) If my complaints could passions move: An interlanguage study of aggression. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1003–1017. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00076‑4
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00076-4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Trosborg, Anna
    (1995) Interlanguage pragmatics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter& Co. doi: 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  45. Turnbull, William
    (1997) An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the study of talk. Unpublished manuscript. Department of psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada.
  46. Yuan, Li
    (2001) An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics33: 271–292. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00031‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00031-X [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.03ho
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error