1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper argues for an integration of post-structuralist and linguistic pragmatic perspectives on discourse as a response to the post-structuralist methodological deficit. In order to make his argument, the author presents and illustrates the approach to discourse, subjectivity and hegemony as presented by Jason Glynos and David Howarth. This post-structuralist approach constitutes a response to the methodological deficit that haunts much of post-structuralist discourse theory. Nevertheless, it does not provide a linguistic toolbox for analysis. Zienkowski argues that the approach can be brought to bear on empirical analysis through the notion of metapragmatic markers. These are linguistic tools that allow us to investigate the self-interpretations of individuals. The practical relevance of using metapragmatic markers in the identification of interpretive logics will be illustrated by means of an analysis of a critical response to the implementation of the Bologna process in Germany. Zienkowski studies Dietrich Lemke’s critical article called published in a special issue of n° 14 devoted to the Bologna process. More specifically, he investigates how Lemke constructs his critical stance. Throughout this process, Zienkowski proposes an interpretive and functionalist heuristic for identifying the interpretive logics operative in his text by means of a functional analysis of metapragmatic markers. He concludes with an argument for integrating both perspectives while emphasising that any articulation of post-structuralist and linguistic pragmatic theories of discourse involves some significant reconsiderations with respect to the indexical and differential theories of meaning that characterise each perspective respectively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.07zie
2012-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angermüller, Johannes
    (2007) Was fordert die Hegemonietheorie? Zu den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer methodischen Umsetzung. In Martin Nonhoff (ed.), Diskurs - radikale Democratie - Hegemonie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp.170–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2008) From discourse theory to discourse analysis. Doing Discourse Analysis Workshop (Denmark), 6. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2011) From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse: Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics43: 2992–3000. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barros, Sebastian , and Gustavo Castagnola
    (2000) The political frontiers of the social: Argentine politics after Peronist populism (1955-1973). In David Howarth , Aletta Norval , and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. London/New York: Manchester University Press, pp.24–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, Richard , and Charles Briggs
    (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual review of anthropology19: 59–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan
    (2005) Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman, Glenn
    (1994) ‘A country of words’: Conceiving the Palestinian nation from the position of exile. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp.138–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bublitz, Wolfram , and Axel Hubler
    (eds.) (2007) Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165 [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, Judith
    (2000) Dynamic conclusions. In Judith Butler , Ernesto Laclau , and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality. London: Verso, pp.263–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith , and Ernesto Laclau
    (2004) Appendix I: The uses of equality. In Simon Critchley , and Oliver Marchart (eds.), Laclau: A critical reader. London/New York: Routledge, pp.329–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, Judith , Ernesto Laclau , and Slavoj Žižek
    (eds.) (2000) Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Caffi, C.
    (1998) Metapragmatics. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.581–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chandler, Daniel
    (2002) Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203166277
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166277 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daryl Slack, Jennifer
    (1996) The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp.112–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, Norman , and Lilie Chouliaraki
    (1999) Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flyvbjerg, Bent
    (2001) Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. (2008 edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810503
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503 [Google Scholar]
  17. Glynos, Jason , and Yannis Stavrakakis
    (2004) Encounters of the real kind: Sussing out the limits of Laclau’s embrace of Lacan. In Simon Critchley , and Oliver Marchart (eds.), Laclau: A critical reader. London/New York: Routledge, pp.201–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Glynos, Jason , and Davod Howarth
    (2007) Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Griggs, Steven , and David Howarth
    (2000) New environmental movements and direct action protest: The campaign against Manchester Airport’s second runway. In David Howarth , Aletta Norval , and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, pp.52–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grossberg, Lawrence
    (1986a) History, politics and postmodernism. In David Morley , and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds.), Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp.151–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1986b) On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. In David Morley , and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp.131–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gumperz, John J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.225. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  23. Howarth, David
    (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2005) Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In David Howarth , and Jacob Torfing (eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp.316–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Howarth, David , and Jacob Torfing
    (eds.) (2005) Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp.364.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Howarth, David , Aletta Norval , and Yannis Stavrakakis
    (eds.) (2000) Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang, Yan
    (2007) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hübler, Axel , and Wolfram Bublitz
    (2007) Introducing metapragmatics in use. In Wolfram Bublitz , and Axel Hübler (eds.), Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1–26. doi: 10.1075/pbns.165
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyland, Ken
    (2000) Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language awareness9.4: 179–97. doi: 10.1080/09658410008667145
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667145 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaworski, Adam , Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasinski
    (2004a) Metalanguage: Why now?In Adam Jaworski , Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.3–10. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaworski, Adam , Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasinzki
    (eds.) (2004b) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  33. Johansson, Marjut , and Eija Suomela-Salmi
    (2011) Énonciation. In Jan Zienkowski , Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.71–101. doi: 10.1075/hoph.8.05mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.05mar [Google Scholar]
  34. Laclau, Ernesto
    (1989) Preface. In Slavoj Žižek (ed.), The sublime object of ideology. London/New York: Verso, ix-xv.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1994a) Why do empty signifiers matter to politics?. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), Emancipation(s). London: Verso, pp.36–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (ed.) (1994b) The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp.296.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2000a) Constructing universality. In Judith Butler , Ernesto Laclau , and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp.281–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2000b) Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In Judith Butler , Ernesto Laclau , and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp.44–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso, pp.198.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maeße, Jens
    (2010) Die vielen Stimmen des Bologna-Prozesses: zur diskursiven Logik eines bildungspolitischen Programms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne
    (2008) We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases. Discourse studies10.5: 635–54. doi: 10.1177/1461445608094216
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608094216 [Google Scholar]
  43. Noh, Eun-Ju
    (2000) Metarepresentation: A relevance-theory approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.69
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.69 [Google Scholar]
  44. Robinson, Douglas
    (2006) Introducing performative pragmatics. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Roulet, E.
    (1996) Polyphony. Handbook of pragmatics online. www.benjamins.nl/online/hop, Accessed 22 / 06 / 2009 .
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Saleel, Renata
    (1994) The crisis of identity and the struggle for new hegemony in the former Yugoslavia. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp.205–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    (1999) Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Torfing, Jacob
    (1999) New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2005) Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges. In David Howarth , and Jacob Torfing (eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp.1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Hecke, Tine
    (2002) Emile Benveniste. Handbook of pragmatics online. www.benjamins.nl/online/hop/, Accessed 15 / 06 / 2010 .
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Verschueren, Jef
    (1999) Understanding pragmatics. (2003 edn.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics10.4: 439–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2004) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Adam Jaworski , Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.53–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2009) Introduction: The pragmatic perspective. In Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1–27. doi: 10.1075/hoph.1
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hoph.1 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2011) Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139026277
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026277 [Google Scholar]
  56. Watson Todd, Richard
    (2005) A fuzzy approach to discourse topics. Semiotica155.1: 93–123. doi: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.155.1part4.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.155.1part4.93 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wetherell, Maragaret
    (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society9.3: 387–412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zienkowski, Jan
    (2011a) Discursive pragmatics: A platform for the pragmatic study of discourse. In Jan Zienkowski , Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1–13. doi: 10.1075/hoph.8.01zie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.01zie [Google Scholar]
  59. (2011b) Analysing political engagement: An interpretive and functionalist discourse analysis of evolving political subjectivities among public activists and intellectuals with a Moroccan background in Flanders. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Antwerp.
  60. Zienkowski, Jan , Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman
    (eds.) (2011) Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1–13. doi: 10.1075/hoph.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8
  61. Žižek, Slavoj
    (1995) The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. (2000) Class struggle or postmodernism? Yes, please!. In Judith Butler , Ernesto Laclau , and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp.90–135.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22.3.07zie
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error