1887
image of Delving into suggestion speech acts in Chinese authoritative academic discourse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this online first article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22022.li
2023-05-15
2024-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alston, William P.
    1994 “Illocutionary Acts and Linguistic Meaning.” InFoundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, ed. bySavas L. Tsohatzidis, –. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, Paddy
    1990 “Politeness Revisited – The Dark Side.” InNew Zealand Ways of Speaking English. Multilingual Matters, ed. byAllan Bell, and Janet Holmes, –. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
    1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee, Janet, and Patricia L. Carrell
    1988 “Tuck in Your Shirt, You Squid: Suggestions in ESL.” Language Learning (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1988.tb00416.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00416.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Beverly S. Hartford
    1996 “Input in an Institutional Setting.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition (): –. 10.1017/S027226310001487X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001487X [Google Scholar]
  8. Bresnahan, Mary
    1992 “The Effects of Advisor Style on Overcoming Client Resistance in the Advising Interview”. Discourse Processes (): –. 10.1080/01638539209544810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544810 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  10. Christensen, Johan
    2018 “Economic Knowledge and the Scientization of Policy Advice.” Policy Sciences (): –. 10.1007/s11077‑018‑9316‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9316-6 [Google Scholar]
  11. DeCapua, Andrea, and Joan Findlay Dunham
    2012 “‘It Wouldn’t Hurt If You Had Your Child Evaluated’: Advice to Mothers in Responses.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. byMiriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.221.06dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.06dec [Google Scholar]
  12. DeCapua, Andrea, and Lisa Huber
    1995 “‘If I Were You…’: Advice in American English.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/mult.1995.14.2.117
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1995.14.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dinsmore, John
    1991Partitioned Representations. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3574‑0_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3574-0_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1985Mental Spaces: Aspect of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1980 “Spilling the Beans on Understanding and Memory for Idioms in Conversation.” Memory & Cognition (): –. 10.3758/BF03213418
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213418 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillingham, Philip
    2019 “From Bureaucracy to Technocracy in a Social Welfare Agency: A Cautionary Tale.” Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development (): –. 10.1080/02185385.2018.1523023
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2018.1523023 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gizzi, Michael C., and Stefan Rädiker
    eds. 2021The Practice of Qualitative Data Analysis: Research Examples Using MAXQDA. Berlin: MAXQDA Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldsmith, Daena J.
    2004Communicating Social Support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511606984
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606984 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldsmith, Daena J., and Kristine Fitch
    1997 “The Normative Context of Advice as Social Support.” Human Communication Research (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1997.tb00406.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00406.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Gu, Edward, and Merle Goldman
    2004 “Introduction: The Transformation of the Relationship between Chinese Intellectuals and the State.” InChinese Intellectuals between State and Market, ed. byEdward X. Gu, and Merle Goldman, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422113_INTRODUCTION
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422113_INTRODUCTION [Google Scholar]
  21. Graumann, Carl F., and Michael C. Sommer
    1988 “Perspective Structure in Language Production and Comprehension.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X880070040
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X880070040 [Google Scholar]
  22. Edmondson, Willis J., and Juliane House
    1981Let’s Talk, and Talk about It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hámori, Ágnes
    2010 “Illocutionary Force, Salience and Attention Management – A Social Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica (): –. 10.1556/ALing.57.2010.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.57.2010.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  24. He, Shanhua, and Tiaoyuan Mao
    2020 “Can the Research on Language Planning Be Also Planned?: Recent Academia-Government Interactions In China.” Current Issues in Language Planning (): –. 10.1080/14664208.2020.1744318
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1744318 [Google Scholar]
  25. Henricson, Sofie, and Marie Nelson
    2017 “Giving and Receiving Advice in Higher Education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish Supervision Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  26. Higuchi, Koichi
    2016KH Coder 3 Reference Manual. Kioto (Japan): Ritsumeikan University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, Ken
    2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2011 “Academic Discourse.” InContinuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, ed. byKen Hyland, and Brian Paltridge, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyland, Ken, and Fiona Hyland
    2012 “‘You Could Make This Clearer’: Teachers’ Advice on ESL Academic Writing.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. byMiriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.221.05hyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.05hyl [Google Scholar]
  30. Jackson, Peter M.
    2007 “Making Sense of Policy Advice.” Public Money and Management (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9302.2007.00592.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00592.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuckartz, Udo
    2014Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446288719
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuno, Susumu
    1987Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1990 “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1994Concept, Image and Symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2001 “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, Eden Sum-hung
    2010 “Making Suggestions: A Contrastive Study of Young Hong Kong and Australian Students.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.014 [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Qun, and Fawen Yu
    2019Blue Book of Ecological Governance. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Limberg, Holger
    2010The Interactional Organization of Academic Talk: Office Hour Consultations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.198
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.198 [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Fengguang, Shi, Wenrui, and Yaochen Deng
    2019 “A Contrastive Study of Chinese and American Political Speech Act of Advising – Taking Diplomatic Discourse as an Example.” Foreign Language Education: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Locher, Miriam A.
    2006Advice Online. Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  43. Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
    2011 “Epistemic Legitimizing Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445611421360c
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360c [Google Scholar]
  44. Martínez-Flor, Alicia
    2005 “A Theoretical Review of the Speech Act of Suggesting: Towards a Taxonomy for Its Use in FLT.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: –. 10.14198/raei.2005.18.08
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2005.18.08 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nuyts, Jan
    1993 “Epistemic Modal Adverbs and Adjectives and the Layered Representation of Conceptual and Linguistic Structure.” Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/ling.1993.31.5.933
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1993.31.5.933 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2004 “The Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/iprg.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. Papafragou, Anna
    2000 “On Speech-Act Modality.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00062‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00062-4 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pattyn, Valérie, Sonja Blum, Ellen Fobé, Mirjam Pekar-Milicevic, and Marleen Brans
    2022 “Academic Policy Advice in Consensus-Seeking Countries: The Cases of Belgium and Germany.” International Review of Administrative Sciences (): –. 10.1177/0020852319878780
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319878780 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pollitt, Christopher
    2006 “Academic Advice to Practitioners – What Is Its Nature, Place and Value Within Academia?.” Public Money and Management (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9302.2006.00534.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00534.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Sanders, José, and Gisela Redeker
    1996 “Perspective and the Representation of Speech and Thought in Narrative Discourse.” InSpaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. byGilles Fauconnier, and Eve Sweetser, –. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sanders, José, and Wilbert Spooren
    1997 “Perspective, Subjectivity, and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View.” InDiscourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byWolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker, and Linda R. Waugh. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.151.08san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.08san [Google Scholar]
  52. Sbisà, Marina
    2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00060‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00060-6 [Google Scholar]
  53. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2012Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214215
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215 [Google Scholar]
  54. Searle, John R.
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  55. 1976 “The Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum, and Pascale Fung
    2013Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20128‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20128-8 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stadler, Stefanie Alexa
    2011 “Coding Speech Acts for Their Degree of Explicitness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  59. Taguchi, Naoko, Loretta Fernández, and Yuechun Jiang
    2021 “Systemic Functional Linguistics Applied to Analyze L2 Speech Acts: Analysis of Advice-giving in a Written Text.” InNew Directions in Second Language Pragmatics, ed. byJ. César Félix-Brasdefer, and Rachel L. Shively, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110721775‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110721775-006 [Google Scholar]
  60. Talmy, Leonard
    1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science (): –. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  61. van Dijk, Teun A.
  62. Vehviläinen, Sanna
    2009 “Student-initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351810902864560
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864560 [Google Scholar]
  63. Verhagen, Arie
    2007 “Construal and Perspectivisation.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byDirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Weisser, Martin
    2010 “Annotating Dialogue Corpora Semi-automatically: A Corpus-linguistic Approach to Pragmatics.” Unpublished Post-doctoral Dissertation, University of Bayreuth.
  65. Wiebe, Janyce
    1990 “Identifying Subjective Characters in Narrative.” InProceedings of COLING 90, –. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/C90-2069.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wu, Shuqiong, and Jing Huo
    2016 “A Cognitive Research of No-Subject Sentences in Chinese Legislative Texts.” Foreign Language and Literature Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Zha, Qiang
    2012 “Intellectuals, Academic Freedom, and University Autonomy in China.” InUniversity Governance and Reform. Policy, Fads, and Experience in International Perspective, ed. byHans G. Schuetze, William Bruneau, and Garnet Grosjean, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137040107_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040107_14 [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao, Shouhui, and Guowen Shang
    2016 “Language Planning Agency in China: From the Perspective of the Language Academies.” Current Issues in Language Planning (): –. 10.1080/14664208.2015.1094386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2015.1094386 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22022.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22022.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: authoritative academic discourse ; suggestions ; China ; politeness ; cognitive pragmatics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error