Definite reference and discourse prominence in Longxi Qiang

References

1. Apothéloz, Denis, and Marje-José Reichler-Béguelin
   1999 “Interpretations and Functions of Demonstrative NPs in Indirect Anaphora.” Journal of Pragmatics311: 363–397. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00073‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00073-3 [Google Scholar]
2. Ariel, Mira
   1988 “Referring and Accessibility.” Journal of Pragmatics241: 65–87.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ariel, Mira
   1990 Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London/New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arnold, Jennifer E.
   1998 “Reference Form and Discourse Patterns.” Ph.D. diss.Stanford University.
5. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1974 “Language and Consciousness.” Language501: 111–133. 10.2307/412014
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412014 [Google Scholar]
6. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1976 “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View.” InSubject and Topic, ed. byCharles N. Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.” InCoherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. byRussell S. Tomlin, 21–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
8. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1996 “Inferring Identifiability and Accessibility.” InReference and Referent Accessibility, ed. byThorstein Fretheim, and Jeanette K. Gundel, 37–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.38.03cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.38.03cha [Google Scholar]
10. Chiarcos, Christian
    2011 “Evaluating Salience Metrics for the Context-Adequate Realization of Discourse Referents.” InProceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), 32–43. Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Christophersen, Paul
    1939 The Articles: A Study of Their Theory and Use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath, and Balthasar Bickel
    2008 Leipzig Glossing Rules. Retrieved from: www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php
    [Google Scholar]
13. DuBois, John W.
    1980 “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” InThe Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. byWallace L. Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Epstein, Richard
    2002 “The Definite Article, Accessibility, and the Construction of Discourse Referents.” Cognitive Linguistics121: 333–378. 10.1515/cogl.2002.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.007 [Google Scholar]
15. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski
    1993 “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language691: 274–307. 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
16. Haude, Katharina
    2019 “On Discourse-Semantic Prominence, Syntactic Prominence, and Prominence of Expression: The Case of Movima.” Journal of Pragmatics1541: 22–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.012 [Google Scholar]
17. Hawkins, John A.
    1978 Definiteness and Indefiniteness. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heim, Irene R.
    1982 “The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases.” Ph.D. diss. University of Massachusetts.
19. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., and Beatrice Primus
    2015 “Prominence Beyond Prosody: A First Approximation.” InpS-prominenceS: Prominence in Linguistics. Proceedings of the International Conference, ed. byAmedeo De Dominicis, 38–58. Viterbo: Disucom Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Huang, Chenglong
    2007 Puxi Qiangyu Yanjiu [A Grammar of Puxi Qiang]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hung, Yu-Chen, and Petra B. Schumacher
    2012 “Topicality Matters: Position-Specific Demands on Chinese Discourse Processing.” Neurosci. Lett. 5111: 59–64. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.013 [Google Scholar]
22. Hung, Yu-Chen, and Petra B. Schumacher
    2014 “Animacy Matters: ERP Evidence for the Multi-Dimensionality of Topic-Worthiness in Chinese.” Brain Research15551: 36–47. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.046
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.046 [Google Scholar]
23. Kadmon, Nirit
    1990 “Uniqueness.” Linguistics and Philosophy131: 273–324. 10.1007/BF00627710
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627710 [Google Scholar]
24. Lambrecht, Kund
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
25. LaPolla, Randy J.
    1995 “Pragmatic Relations and Word Order in Chinese.” InWord Order in Discourse, ed. byPamela A. Downing, and Michael Noonan, 297–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.30.11lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.30.11lap [Google Scholar]
26. LaPolla, Randy J., and Chenglong Huang
    2003 A Grammar of Qiang: With Annotated Texts and Glossary. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197273 [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1976 “Development of the Causative in Mandarin Chinese: Interaction of Diachronic Processes in Syntax.” InThe Grammar of Causative Constructions, ed. byMasayoshi Shibatani, 477–492. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842_020
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_020 [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Guangkun
    1998 Mawo Qiangyu Yanjiu [Studies on the Mawo dialect of the Qiang language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lyons, Christopher
    1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
30. Ortmann, Albert
    2014 “Definite Article Asymmetries and Concept Types: Semantic and Pragmatic Uniqueness.” InFrames and Concept Types: Applications in Language and Philosophy, ed. byThomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Oswald, and Wiebke Petersen, 293–321. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01541‑5_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_13 [Google Scholar]
31. Roberts, Craige
    2003 “Uniqueness in Definite Noun Phrases.” Linguistics and Philosophy261: 287–350. 10.1023/A:1024157132393
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024157132393 [Google Scholar]
32. Schumacher, Petra B., and Klaus von Heusinger
    2019 “Introduction to Prominence in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics1541: 18–21. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.019 [Google Scholar]
33. Sun, Hongkai
    1981 Qiangyu Jianzhi [A Brief Description of the Qiang language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. von Heusinger, Klaus, and Petra B. Schumacher
    2019 “Discourse Prominence: Definition and Application.” Journal of Pragmatics1541: 117–127. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025 [Google Scholar]
35. Zheng, Wuxi
    2020 “The First Person Singular Pronoun Topic as Attention-Getter in Interaction: A Study of qámà in Longxi Qiang.” Journal of Pragmatics1561: 1–15. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.002 [Google Scholar]