Why not focus on combating the virus?

References

1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   2014 “Languaging When Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006 [Google Scholar]
2. Bednarek, Monika
   2017 “Fandom”. InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, –. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-020 [Google Scholar]
3. Bezuidenhout, Anne
   2013 “Perspective Taking in Conversation: A Defense of Speaker Non-Egocentricity.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.007 [Google Scholar]
4. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
   2018 “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/ip.00007.bou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00007.bou [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
6. Caffi, Claudia, and Richard W. Janney
   1994 “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90115‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5 [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, Xinren
   2019 Critical Pragmatic Studies on Chinese Public Discourse. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429346408
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346408 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
9. Decety, Jean, and Jessica A. Sommerville
   2003 “Shared Representations between Self and Other: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience View.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004 [Google Scholar]
10. de Saint Preux, Anna Doquin, and Ocarina Masid Blanco
    2021 “The Power of Conceptual Metaphors in the Age of Pandemic: The Influence of the WAR and SPORT Domains on Emotions and Thoughts.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2021.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.08.003 [Google Scholar]
11. Freidson, Eliot
    1970 Professional Dominance. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Giora, Rachel
    1997 “Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 [Google Scholar]
13. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry (): –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gordon, David Paul
    1983 “Hospital Slang for Patients: Crocks, Gomers, Groks, and Others.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500009799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009799 [Google Scholar]
17. Halász, Katinka
    2018 “Misunderstandings in Communicative Language Use.” Sparchtheorie and Germanistische Linguistik: –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haugh, Michael
    2008 “The Place of Intention in the Interactional Achievement of Implicature.” InIntention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, eds. byIstvan Kecskes, and Jacob May, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211474.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211474.1.45 [Google Scholar]
19. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/Politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Hofstede, Geert
    1980 “Culture and Organizations.” International Studies of Management & Organization (): –. 10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300 [Google Scholar]
21. Ivaskó, Livia, and Enikő Németh T.
    2002 “Types and Reasons of Communicative Failures.” Modern Filológiai Közlemények: –.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jaworska, Sylvia
    2021 “Investigating Media Representations of the Coronavirus in the UK, USA and Germany: What Can a Comparative Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis Contribute to Our Understanding of the Covid-19 Pandemic?” InViral Discourse, ed. byRodney H. Jones, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jenkins, Henry
    2006 Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jenkins, Henry
    2012 Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203114339
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114339 [Google Scholar]
25. Jenkins, Henry, Mizuko Ito, and danah boyd
    2016 Participatory Culture in a Networked Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kecskes, Istvan
    2008 “Dueling Context: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004 [Google Scholar]
27. Kecskes, Istvan
    2012 “Is There Anyone Out There Who Really Is Interested in the Speaker?” Language and Dialogue (): –. 10.1075/ld.2.2.06kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.06kec [Google Scholar]
28. Kecskes, Istvan
    2019 “The Interplay of Prior Experience and Actual Situational Context in Intercultural First Encounters.” Pragmatics and Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.19008.kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19008.kec [Google Scholar]
29. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang
    2009 “Activating, Seeking, and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec [Google Scholar]
30. Keysar, Boaz
    2007 “Communication and Miscommunication: The Role of Egocentric Processes.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/IP.2007.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.004 [Google Scholar]
31. Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher
    2012 “Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in Online Disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002 [Google Scholar]
32. Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher
    2013 “The Role of Emotions in Relational Work.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014 [Google Scholar]
33. Locher, Miriam. A., and Richard J. Watts
    2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
34. Locher, Miriam. A., and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negociating Norms of Linguistic Behavior.” InImpolinetess in Language. Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, eds. byDerek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lukes, Steven
    1978 “Power and Authority.” InA History of Sociological Analysis, ed. byThomas B. Bottomore, and Robert A. Nisbet, –. London: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lupton, Deborah
    1997 “Doctors on the Medical Profession.” Sociology of Health & Illness: –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9566.1997.tb00414.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00414.x [Google Scholar]
37. Martikainen, Jari, and Inari Sakki
    2021 “Boosting Nationalism through COVID-19 Images: Multimodal Construction of the Failure of the ‘Dear Enemy’ with COVID-19 in the National Press.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/17504813211002039
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002039 [Google Scholar]
38. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber
    2011 “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (): –. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
39. Miller, Vincent
    2008 “New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture.” Convergence (): –. 10.1177/1354856508094659
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094659 [Google Scholar]
40. Moeschler, Jacques
    2004 “Intercultural [ragmatics: A Cognitive Approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/iprg.2004.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2004.007 [Google Scholar]
41. Moeschler, Jacques
    2009 “Pragmatics, Propositional and Non-Propositional Effects: Can a Theory of Utterance Interpretation Account for Emotions in Verbal Communication?” Social Science Information (): –. 10.1177/0539018409106200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409106200 [Google Scholar]
42. Mustajoki, Arto
    2012 “A Speaker-Oriented Multidimensional Approach to Risks and Causes of Miscommunication.” Language and Dialogue (): –. 10.1075/ld.2.2.03mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.03mus [Google Scholar]
43. Németh T., Enikő
    2015 “The Role of Perspectives in Various Forms of Language Use.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2014‑0072
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0072 [Google Scholar]
44. Oyserman, Daphna, Heather M. Coon, and Markus Kemmelmeier
    2002 “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin (): –. 10.1037/0033‑2909.128.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 [Google Scholar]
45. Padilla Cruz, Manuel
    2017 “Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance.” Research in Language (): –. 10.1515/rela‑2017‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0006 [Google Scholar]
46. Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily, and Edward Gibson
    2011 “Word Lengths Are Optimized for Efficient Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (): –. 10.1073/pnas.1012551108
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012551108 [Google Scholar]
47. Jones, Rodney H.
    2021 “Order out of Chaos: Coronavirus Communication and the Construction of Competence.” InViral Discourse, ed. byRodney H. Jones, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108986465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986465 [Google Scholar]
48. Ruusuvuori, Johanna
    2000 Control in the Medical Consultation: Practices of Giving and Receiving the Reason for the Visit in Primary Health Care. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schröder, Ulrike
    2018 “Face as an Interactional Construct in the Context of Connectedness and Separateness: An Empirical Approach to Culture-Specific Interpretations of Face.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Shintel, Hadas, and Boaz Keysar
    2009 “Less is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication.” Topics in Cognitive Science (): –. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01018.x [Google Scholar]
51. Shuvalov, Denis, and Enikő Németh T.
    2023 “Perspective-Taking in Argumentative Discourse.” Kazan Linguistic Journal (): –. 10.26907/2658‑3321.2023.6.3.431‑441
    https://doi.org/10.26907/2658-3321.2023.6.3.431-441 [Google Scholar]
52. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2005 “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
54. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2008 “Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport.” InCulturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. byHelen Spencer-Oatey, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Peter Franklin
    2009 Intercultural interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Berlin: Springer. 10.1057/9780230244511
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511 [Google Scholar]
56. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2011 “Conceptualising ‘the Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion And (Im)Politeness Comments.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
57. Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Christian Go, and Vincent Pak
    2022 “Keep Calm, Stay Safe, and Drink Bubble Tea: Commodifying the Crisis of COVID-19 in Singapore Advertising.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404521000567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000567 [Google Scholar]
58. Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404514000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
59. Thomas, Jenny. A.
    1995 Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Yu, Hangyan, Lu Huiling, and Jie Hu
    2021 “A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on the Covid-19 Pandemic in China and the UK.” International Journal of English Linguistics (): . 10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36 [Google Scholar]
61. Yus, Francisco
    2018 “The Interface between Pragmatics and Internet-Mediated Communication.” InPragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. byCornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.12yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.12yus [Google Scholar]
62. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2004 “Relevance Theory.” InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn, and Gregory L. Ward, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Zuo, Baiyao
    2018 “Emotive Misunderstanding within an Extended Relevance Theory.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0022 [Google Scholar]