1887
image of What kind of laughter?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article examines the pragmatic functions of the Hebrew graphic laughter marker “hhh” in a particularly turbulent public-political discursive arena – online readers’ comments to Facebook posts by the two leading contenders for the post of Israeli prime minister during the 2020 election campaign, Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz.

We argue that “hhh” fulfills three functions dependent on its co-text, textual position, and length: (1)  – conveying contempt, ridicule, or disgust, towards a previous comment or post, their authors, or the associated political wing; (2)  – signaling the employment of pragmatic strategies in the comment; and (3)  – indicating the deciphering of pragmatic strategies in a previous post or comment.

The findings indicate that in all three categories “hhh” is used mainly to taunt the rival political wing, at times by creating an alliance with other commenters at the expense of their common rivals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22033.shu
2023-11-28
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken, and Peter Jan Schellens
    2013 “The Use of Co-Textual Irony Markers in Written Discourse.” Humor (): –. 10.1515/humor‑2013‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Friedman, Sam, and Giselinde Kuipers
    2013 “The Divisive Power of Humour: Comedy, Taste and Symbolic Boundaries.” Cultural Sociology (): –. 10.1177/1749975513477405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975513477405 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., Gregory A. Bryant, and Herbert L. Colston
    2014 “Where is the Humor in Verbal Irony?” Humor (): –. 10.1515/humor‑2014‑0106
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0106 [Google Scholar]
  5. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gruber, Helmut
    2021 “Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2016 Austrian Presidential Campaign.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.09gru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.09gru [Google Scholar]
  7. Haverkate, Henk
    1990 “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90065‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay, Jennifer
    2001 “The Pragmatics of Humor Support.” Humor (): –. 10.1515/humr.14.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirsch, Galia, and Pnina Shukrun-Nagar
    . (in press). “Flirting with the Israeli Prime Minister, Humorously.” The European Journal of Humour Research (). 10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.2.789
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.2.789 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirsch, Galia
    2020 “Irony, Humor or Both? The Model Revisited.” InThe Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, Voices and Functions (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 316), ed. byZohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar, and Galia Hirsch, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.316.01hir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316.01hir [Google Scholar]
  11. Ho, Pang-Chieh
    2018 “No Laughing Matter: I Say LOL, You Say Ek1: How People Around the World Laugh Online.” Digg.Com. AccessedFebruary 12th 2021. https://digg.com/2018/how-different-countries-laugh-online
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalman, Yoram M., and Darren Gergle
    2014 “Letter Repetitions in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Unique Link between Spoken and Online Language.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.047 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalsnes, Bente, Anders Olof Larsson, and Gunn Sara Enli
    2017 “The Social Media Logic of Political Interaction: Exploring Citizens’ and Politicians’ Relationship on Facebook and Twitter.” First Monday: –. 10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6348 [Google Scholar]
  14. Karoui, Jihen, Farah Benamara, Véronique Moriceau, Viviana Patti, Crisitna Bosco, and Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles
    2017 “Exploring the Impact of Pragmatic Phenomena on Irony Detection in Tweets: A Multilingual Corpus Study.” 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, –. Valencia, Spain. hal-01686475. 10.18653/v1/E17‑1025
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/E17-1025 [Google Scholar]
  15. Katila, Julia, Yumei Gan, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    2020 “Interaction Rituals and ‘Social Distancing’: New Haptic Trajectories and Touching from a Distance in the Time of COVID-19.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445620928213
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620928213 [Google Scholar]
  16. König, Katharina
    2019 “Stance Taking with ‘Laugh’ Particles and Emojis – Sequential and Functional Patterns of ‘Laughter’ in a Corpus of German WhatsApp Chats.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kopytowska, Monika
    2013 “Blogging as the Mediatization of Politics and a New Form of Social Interaction: A Case Study of ‘Proximization Dynamics’ in Polish and British Political Blogs.” InAnalyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. byPiotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.50.15kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.15kop [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuipers, Giselinde
    2011 “The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies (): –. 10.1177/1367549410370072
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410370072 [Google Scholar]
  19. Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
    2021 “Speech Acts and the Dissemination of Knowledge in Social Networks.” InApproaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. byChaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.318.05lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.05lab [Google Scholar]
  20. Larson, Sarah
    2015 “Hahaha vs. Hehehe.” The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/hahaha-vs-hehehe (AccessedFebruary 12th 2021.)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lehti, Lotta
    2011 “Blogging Politics in Various Ways: A Typology of French Politicians’ Blogs.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
    2011 “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society (): –. 10.1177/1461444810365313
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyers, Laura Marie
    2019 “What Everyone REALLY Thinks of Your ‘Haha’ vs. ‘LOL’ vs. ‘Hehe’ Texting Choices.” Popsugar Tech. AccessedFebruary 17th 2021. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/everyone-really-thinks-haha-vs-233237572.html
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Petitjean, Cécile, and Etienne Morel
    2017 “‘Hahaha’: Laughter as a Resource to Manage WhatsApp Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Raskin, Victor, and Salvatore Attardo
    1994 “Non-literalness and Non-bona-fide in Language: An Approach to Formal and Computational Treatments of Humor.” Pragmatics and Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.2.1.02ras
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.2.1.02ras [Google Scholar]
  26. Redeker, Gisela, and Helmut Gruber
    2014 “Introduction.” InThe Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and Applications (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 254), ed. byHelmut Gruber, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.254.01red
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.254.01red [Google Scholar]
  27. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2019 “‘Well, Yair? When Will You Be Prime Minister?’: Different Readings of Ordinariness in a Politician’s Facebook Post as a Case in Point.” InThe Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 307), ed. byAnita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.307.05shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.05shu [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020a “The Right to Speak and the Request to Remain Silent: Who Own Politicians’ Facebook Pages?” Israel Affairs (): –. 10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1697483 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2020b “‘Hero, Genius, King, and Messiah’: Ironic Echoing in Pro-Ethos and Anti-Ethos Readers’ Comments on Facebook Posts.” InThe Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, Voices and Functions (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 316), ed. byZohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar, and Galia Hirsch, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.316.03shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316.03shu [Google Scholar]
  30. 2021 “Ironic Echoes as a Strategy of Silencing in Online Comments to Politicians’ Facebook Posts.” Israel Studies in Language and Society (): –. (Hebrew)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2022 “‘There Is No One Like You Bibi’: Israelis Write to the Prime Minister.” Israel Studies in Language and Society. (Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” InRadical Pragmatics, ed. byPeter Cole, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Steinfeld, Nili, and Azi Lev-On
    2020 “MPs on Facebook: Differences between Members of Coalition and Opposition.” Digital Government: Research and Practice (): –. 10.1145/3363415
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3363415 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Elena Popa
    2011 “Humour in Politics and the Politics of Humour.” Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment: –. 10.1075/dapsac.46.03tsa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46.03tsa [Google Scholar]
  35. Weizman, Elda, and Marcelo Dascal
    2005 “Interpreting Speaker’s Meanings in Literary Dialogue.” InDialogue Analysis IX: Dialogue in Literature and the Media. Part 1: Literature, ed. byAnne Betten, and Monika Dannerer, –. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110946062.61
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946062.61 [Google Scholar]
  36. Weizman, Elda
    2008Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yus, Francisco
    2022Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22033.shu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22033.shu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error