
Full text loading...
Abstract
Public apologies seek moral reconciliation with the victim and the broader audience. When published online, they also become the focus of impoliteness metadiscourse, particularly on Twitter/X. Drawing on the pragmatic approaches to apologies as moral acts and on impoliteness theory, we aim to analyze how users reacted to a public apology, issued by Formula One driver Nelson Piquet after he deployed the term “neguinho/nigger” to refer to Lewis Hamilton. Given the controversy about the term, we examined if users classified it as a racist slur or as a neutral form of address, as Piquet framed it. Our data comes from 469 tweets, published as replies to the apology. The findings show that 84.5% of the users classified the term as a racist insult and judged the apology as insincere. Processes of online public shaming were also identified in the posts, aiming at exposing Piquet for his misconduct.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
References
Data & Media loading...