1887
image of The impoliteness metadiscourse about a public apology
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Public apologies seek moral reconciliation with the victim and the broader audience. When published online, they also become the focus of impoliteness metadiscourse, particularly on Twitter/X. Drawing on the pragmatic approaches to apologies as moral acts and on impoliteness theory, we aim to analyze how users reacted to a public apology, issued by Formula One driver Nelson Piquet after he deployed the term “neguinho/nigger” to refer to Lewis Hamilton. Given the controversy about the term, we examined if users classified it as a racist slur or as a neutral form of address, as Piquet framed it. Our data comes from 469 tweets, published as replies to the apology. The findings show that 84.5% of the users classified the term as a racist insult and judged the apology as insincere. Processes of online public shaming were also identified in the posts, aiming at exposing Piquet for his misconduct.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22057.oli
2025-06-03
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austin, John L.
    1975How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bentley, Joshua
    2015 “Shifting Identification: A Theory of Apologies and Pseudo-Apologies. Public Relations Review (): –. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilder, Richard B.
    2008 “The Role of Apology in International Law.” InThe Age of Apology: Facing Up to The Past, ed. byMark Gibney, Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, Jean-Marc Coicaud, and Niklaus Steiner, –. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain
    1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouvier, Gwen, and David Machin
    2021 “What Gets Lost in Twitter ‘Cancel Culture’ Hashtags? Calling Out Racists Reveals Some Limitations of Social Justice Campaigns.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926520977215
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977215 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bushman, Brad J., and L. Rowell Huesmann
    2010 “Aggression.” InHandbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed., ed. bySusan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, –. New York: Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Christie, Christine
    2013 “The Relevance of Taboo Language: An Analysis of the Indexical Values of Swearwords.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  9. Claridge, Claudia
    2011Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010 “Conventionalized Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll, and Claire Hardaker
    2019 “Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America.” InFrom Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, ed. byEva Ogiermann, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182119.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182119.008 [Google Scholar]
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    eds. 2017The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2017 “(Im)Politeness and Mixed Messages.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, and Daniel Kádár, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_13 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eelen, Gino
    2014A Critique of Politeness Theory. Vol.. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ekström, Mats, and Bengt Johansson
    2008 “Talk Scandals.” Media, Culture & Society (): –. 10.1177/0163443707084340
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084340 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2019 “Emic Conceptualizations of Face (Imagen) in Peninsular Spanish.” InFrom Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, ed. byEva Ogiermann, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182119.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182119.013 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gill, Kathleen
    2000 “The Moral Functions of an Apology”. The Philosophical Forum (): –. 10.1111/0031‑806X.00025
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-806X.00025 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Govier, Trudy, and Wilhelm Verwoerd
    2002 “The Promise and Pitfalls of Apology.” Journal of Social Philosophy (): –. 10.1111/1467‑9833.00124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00124 [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, Bo, Paul Cook, and Timothy Baldwin
    2014 “Text-Based Twitter User Geolocation Prediction.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research: –. 10.1613/jair.4200
    https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4200 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hansberg, Olbeth
    2000 “The Role of Emotions in Moral Psychology: Shame and Indignation.” The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy: –. 10.5840/wcp2020009102
    https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp2020009102 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
    2019 “Offence and Conflict Talk.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. byMatthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-12 [Google Scholar]
  26. Haugh, Michael
    2014Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jahan, Md Saroar, and Mourad Oussalah
    2023 “A Systematic Review of Hate Speech Automatic Detection Using Natural Language Processing.” Neurocomputing: . 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126232
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126232 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kampf, Zohar
    2009 “Public (Non-)Apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2016 “All the Best! Performing Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  31. Locher, Miriam A., and Brook Bolander
    2019 “Ethics in Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  32. Matley, David
    2018 “‘Let’s See How Many of You Mother Fuckers Unfollow Me for This’: The Pragmatic Function of the Hashtag #sorrynotsorry in Non-Apologetic Instagram Posts.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. McVittie, Chris, Rahul Sambaraju, and Freya Bain
    2021 “‘I Love James Blunt as Much as I Love Herpes’–‘I Love That You’re Not Ashamed to Admit You Have Both’: Attempted Insults and Responses on Twitter.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Driscoll, Jim
    2020Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence and Social Control. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350169708
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350169708 [Google Scholar]
  35. Oliveira, Ana Larissa A. M., and Marisa M. Carneiro
    2020 “#elesim, #elenão, #elasim, #elanão: o Twitter e as Hashtags de Amor e de Ódio na Campanha Presidencial Brasileira de 2018.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso: –. 10.1590/1982‑4017‑200103‑9718
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-200103-9718 [Google Scholar]
  36. Oliveira, Ana Larissa A. M., and Monique V. Miranda
    2022 “‘Calling a Spade, a Spade’: Impoliteness and Shame on Twitter.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Olshtain, Elite, and Andrew A. Cohen
    1983 “Apology: A Speech Act Set.” InSociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. byNessa Wolfson, and Elliot Judd, –. Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ott, Brian L.
    2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication (): –. 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 [Google Scholar]
  39. Poppi, Fabio I. M., and Marta Dynel
    2021 “Ad Libidinem: Forms of Female Sexualisation in RoastMe Humour.” Sexualities (): –. 10.1177/1363460720931338
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720931338 [Google Scholar]
  40. Purohit, Hemant, Ashley Hampton, Valerie L. Shalin, Amit P. Sheth, John Flach, and Shreyansh Bhatt
    2013 “What Kind of #Conversation Is Twitter? Mining #Psycholinguistic Cues for Emergency Coordination.” Computers in Human Behavior (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Renner, Judith
    2011 “I’m Sorry for Apologising: Czech and German Apologies and Their Perlocutionary Effects.” Review of International Studies (): –. 10.1017/S0260210510001129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001129 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schumann, Karina, and Anna Dragotta
    2020 “Is Moral Redemption Possible? The Effectiveness of Public Apologies for Sexual Misconduct.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: . 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104002 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shannon, Geordan, et al
    2022 “Intersectional Insights into Racism and Health: Not Just a Question of Identity.” The Lancet (): –. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(22)02304‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02304-2 [Google Scholar]
  44. Skoric, Marko M., Keng Hui Wong, Jia Ping Esther Chua, Pei Jue Yeo, and Meiyan Angeline Liew
    2010 “Online Shaming in the Asian Context: Community Empowerment or Civic Vigilantism?” Surveillance & Society (): –. 10.24908/ss.v8i2.3485
    https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i2.3485 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown
    2017Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56759‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56759-6 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tavuchis, Nicholas
    1991Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Terkourafi, Marina
    2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics (): –. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
  48. 2005 “Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research”. Journal of Greek Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson, Janna
    2007 “Apology, Justice and Respect: A Critical Defense of Political Apology.” InThe Age of Apology: Facing Up to the Past, ed. byMark Gibney, Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, Jean-Marc Coicaud, and Niklaus Steiner, –. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vásquez, Camilla
    2021 “I Appreciate U Not Being a Total Prick…: Oppositional Stancetaking, Impoliteness and Relational Work in Adversarial Twitter Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vladimirou, Dimitra, and Juliane House
    2018 “Ludic Impoliteness and Globalisation on Twitter: ‘I Speak England Very Best’ #agglika_Tsipra, #Tsipras #Clinton.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yoshitake, Masaki
    2004 “Critique of J. L. Austin’s Speech Act Theory: Decentralization of the Speaker-Centered Meaning in Communication.” Kyushu Communication Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zappavigna, Michele
    2015 ”Searchable Talk: The Linguistic Functions of Hashtags.” Social Semiotics (): –. 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2017 “Twitter.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-008 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22057.oli
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22057.oli
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error