‘I think’ in Swedish L1 and L2 group interactions

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   1997 “I think – An English Modal Particle”. InModality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. byToril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westwik, 2–44. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889932.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter, and Jan Lindström
   2011 “Verb-first Conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speaking”. InConstructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. byPeter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 218–262. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110229080.218
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080.218 [Google Scholar]
3. Auer, Peter, and Jan Lindström
   2016 “Left/right Asymmetries and the Grammar of Pre- vs. Post-positioning in German and Swedish Talk-in-Interaction”. Language Sciences561: 68–92. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.03.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Baumgarten, Nicole, and Juliane House
   2010 “I think and I don’t know in English as Lingua Franca and Native English Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (5): 1184–1200. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.018
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.018 [Google Scholar]
5. Blensenius, Kristian
   2014 Jag tänker att… [“I think that…”]. Språktidningen1/2015 https://spraktidningen.se/2014/12/jag-tanker-att/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
   2018 Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deppermann, Arnulf, and Silke Reineke
   2017 “Epistemische Praktiken und ihre feinen Unterschiede: Verwendungen von ich dachte in gesprochener Sprache.” InVerben im interaktiven Kontext. Bewegungsverben und mental Verben in gesprochenen Deutsch, ed. byArnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske, and Arne Zeschel, 337–375. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Diaz, Maria Angela, Ken Lau, and Chia-Yen Lin
   2020 “Pragmatic Functions of I think in Computer-mediated, Cross-cultural Communication between Taiwanese and Japanese Undergraduate Students”. Pragmatics30 (4): 509–531. 10.1075/prag.18029.dia
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18029.dia [Google Scholar]
9. Drew, Paul
   2013 “Turn Design.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 131–149. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Enfield, Nick
    2011 “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byJakob Steensig, Lorenza Mondada, and Tanya Stivers, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.013 [Google Scholar]
11. Fiedler, Sophia
    2023 “The Grammar-in-Use of Direct Reported Thought in French and German. An Interactional and Multimodal Analysis.” PhD dissertation, University of Neuchâtel/University of Hamburg.
12. Frommhertz, Yannick
    2022 “Thinking Things in German versus Swedish. A Cross-linguistic Comparison of Verbs of Thinking in Two Genetically Close Languages.” Studia Linguistica761: 464–506. 10.1111/stul.12179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12179 [Google Scholar]
13. Goddard, Cliff, and Susanna Karlsson
    2003 “Re-thinking THINK: Contrastive Semantics of Swedish and English.” InProceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Australian Language Society, ed. byCristo Moskovsky. www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2003.html
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hall, Joan Kelly, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
    2001 “L2 Interactional Competence and Development.” InL2 Interactional Competence and Development, ed. byJoan Kelly Hall, John Hellerman, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, 1–15. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
    2014 “Agreement or Crystallization: Patterns of 1st and 2nd Person Subjects and Verbs of Cognition in Finnish Conversational Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics631: 63–78. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.011 [Google Scholar]
16. Hellermann, John
    2008 Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690272
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690272 [Google Scholar]
17. Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper, and Tom Koole
    2020 “Sharing Knowledge with Peers: Epistemic Displays in Collaborative Writing of Primary School Children.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction241: 100378. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100378
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100378 [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
19. Hopper, Paul, and Sandra A. Thompson
    2008 “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” InCrosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. byRitva Laury, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.80.06hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.06hop [Google Scholar]
20. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
21. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2012 “I Thought It Was Very Interesting: Conversational Formats for Taking a Stance.” Journal of Pragmatics44 (15): 2194–2210. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.005 [Google Scholar]
22. Karlsson, Susanna
    2005 Modalitet i interaktion. En studie av jag tycker och tycker jag [Modality in interaction. A study of jag tycker and tycker jag]. InSamtal och grammatik. Studier i svenskt samtalsspråk, ed. byJan Anward, and Bengt Nordberg, 119–138. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kasper, Gabriele, and Johannes Wagner
    2011 “A Conversation-Analytic Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” InAlternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. byDwight Atkinson, 117–142. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Keevallik, Leelo
    2010 “Clauses Emerging as Epistemic Adverbs in Estonian Conversation.” Linguistica Uralica46 (2): 81–101. 10.3176/lu.2010.2.01
    https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2010.2.01 [Google Scholar]
25. Kolu, Jaana
    2022 “Vad tänker du om det? Verbet tänka som epistemisk markör i tidningsspråk [What do you think about it? The verb tänka as an epistemic marker in newspapers].” InSvenskan i Finland191, ed. bySiv Björklund, Bodil Haagensen, Marianne Nordman, and Anders Westerlund, 149–162. Vasa: Svensk-Österbottniska Samfundet.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lahtinen, Sinikka
    2010 “Min kompis plejar drums. Engelskans inflytande på finska högstadieelevers svenska [My friend plays the drums. English influence on Finnish upper elementary school pupils’ Swedish].” InSvenskans beskrivning 30, ed. byCecilia Falk, Andreas Nord, and Rune Palm, 177–186. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Laury, Ritva, and Tsuyoshi Ono
    (eds) 2020 Fixed Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.315
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.315 [Google Scholar]
28. Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2014 “Introduction.” Pragmatics24:3: 435–452.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lehti-Eklund, Hanna
    2006 “Att planera och reparera. Skillnader mellan talare av svenska som förstaspråk och andraspråk [To plan and repair. Differences between speakers of Swedish as first and second language].” InLek och lärt. Vänskrift till Jan Einarsson, ed. bySofia Ask, Gunilla Byrman, Solveig Hammarbäck, Maria Lindgren, and Per Stille, 120–131. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lindström, Jan, and Anne-Marie Londen
    2008 “Constructing Reasoning. The Connectives för att (Causal), så att (Consecutive) and men att (Adversative) in Swedish Conversations.” InConstructional Reorganization, ed. byJaakko Leino. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.5.06lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.5.06lin [Google Scholar]
31. Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
    2016 “A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics1061: 72–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
32. Mullan, Kerry, and Susanna Karlsson
    2012 “Subjectivity in Contrast: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of ‘I think’ in Australian English, French and Swedish.” InSubjectivity in Language and in Discourse, ed. byNicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois, and Juliane House, 271–294. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nelson, Marie, and Sofie Henricson
    2019 “Kognitionsverb i sverigesvenska och finlandssvenska handledningssamtal [Cognition verbs in Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish supervision meetings].” Puhe ja kieli39:1: 45–68. 10.23997/pk.69809
    https://doi.org/10.23997/pk.69809 [Google Scholar]
34. Norrby, Catrin, Jan Lindström, Jenny Nilsson, and Camilla Wide
    2020 “Pluricentric Languages.” InHandbook of Pragmatics231, ed. byJef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 201–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hop.23.plu1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.23.plu1 [Google Scholar]
35. Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2007 “Increments in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Introductory Remarks.” Pragmatics17:4: 505–512.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
    2011 “Developing ‘Methods’ for Interaction: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disagreement Sequences in French L2.” InL2 Interactional Competence and Development, ed. byJoan Kelly Hall, John Hellerman, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072-010 [Google Scholar]
37. Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
    2015 “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” InUsage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. byTeresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 233–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-012 [Google Scholar]
38. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rönnqvist, Sara, and Jan Lindström
    2021 “Turn Continuations and Gesture: “And Then”-Prefacing in Multi-Party Conversations.” Frontiers in Communication61: 670173. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.670173
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.670173 [Google Scholar]
40. Rönnqvist, Sara
    2021 “Det adverbiella uttrycket på något sätt i samtalsinteraktion [The adverbial expression på något sätt (’in some way’) in Swedish interaction].” Språk och stil31:2, 39–71. 10.33063/diva‑472199
    https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-472199 [Google Scholar]
41. Saarela, Jan
    2021 Finlandssvenskarna 2021 – en statistisk rapport [Finland Swedes 2021 – A statistical report]. Helsingfors: Svenska Finlands Folkting.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
44. Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    (eds.) 2001 Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sidag.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10 [Google Scholar]
45. Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers
    2013 The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Skjold Frøshaug, Andrea, and Truls Stende
    2021 Does the Nordic Language Community Exist?Analysis no. 01/2021. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. 10.6027/nord2021‑004
    https://doi.org/10.6027/nord2021-004 [Google Scholar]
47. Skogmyr Marian, Klara
    2020 The Development of Interactional Competence in a Second Language. A Multimodal Analysis of Complaining in French Interactions. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stevanovic, Melisa
    2013 “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-Making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics23 (3): 519–544.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
    2005 “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction”. Semiotica156–1/41: 1–20. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1 [Google Scholar]
50. Streeck, Jürgen
    2021 “The Emancipation of Gestures.” Interactional Linguistics1 (1): 90–122. 10.1075/il.20013.str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str [Google Scholar]
51. Thompson, Sandra A.
    2002 “Object Complements and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language26 (1): 125–163. 10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho [Google Scholar]
52. Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
    1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” InApproaches to Grammaticalization: Volume II. Types of Grammatical Markers. ed. byBernd Heine, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
53. Toropainen, Outi, and Sinikka Lahtinen
    2013 “Argumentation på L2-svenska: inlärare skriver insändare [Argumentation in L2-Swedish: learners write readers’ letters].” InSvenskans beskrivning 33, ed. byJan Lindström, Sofie Henricson, Anne Huhtala, Pirjo Kukkonen, Hanna Lehti-Eklund, and Camilla Lindholm. Helsingfors: Helsingfors Universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Toulmin, Stephen
    1958 [2003] The Uses of Argument. Updated Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Viberg, Åke
    2005 “The Lexical Typological Profile of Swedish Mental Verbs.” Languages in Contrast5 (1): 121–157. 10.1075/lic.5.1.09vib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.5.1.09vib [Google Scholar]
56. Wagner, Johannes
    2015 “Designing for Language Learning in the Wild: Creating Social Infrastructures for Second Language Learning.” InUsage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. byTeresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 75–104. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-006 [Google Scholar]