1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of China’s real estate agents’ persuasion realizations on WeChat Moments
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Persuasion is a well-documented language phenomenon in the fields of rhetoric, communication, and sociopsychology. However, there is still a need for further research into persuasion on social media from a pragmatic perspective. The current research contributes to the existing literature on persuasion, particularly in virtual environments, by examining the tactics of online persuasion with a dataset of 409 excerpts from WeChat Moments. It examines the frequency and percentage of persuasive strategies deployed by fourteen Chinese real estate agents. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of each tactic is conducted, supported by specific examples. The findings indicate that, in increasing order of frequency, persuasion attempts on the participants’ WeChat Moments are primarily realized through rational, ethos, and emotional appeals. The determinants of this strategic inclination are examined with respect to the anonymity afforded by the Internet, media effect, community of practice and Chinese cultural particulars.

© International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22062.he
2024-07-22
2025-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.22062.he
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Momani, Kawakib Radwan
    2014 “Strategies of Persuasion in Letters of Complaint in Academic Context: The Case of Jordanian University Students’ Complaints.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445614546257
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546257 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
    2022 “Metadiscourse in Online Advertising: Exploring Linguistic and Visual Metadiscourse in Social Media Advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027 [Google Scholar]
  3. Altikriti, Sahar
    2016 “Persuasive Speech Acts in Barack Obama’s Inaugural Speeches (2009, 2013) and the Last State of the Union Address (2016).” International Journal of Linguistics (): –. 10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9274
     https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9274 [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin, John
    1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgoon, Michael
    1994 “Paths II: The Garden Variety.” Communication Theory: –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1994.tb00084.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00084.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaiken, Shelly, and Alice H. Eagly
    1983 “Communication Modality as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of Communicator Salience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.45.2.241
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Xi, Gang Li, YunDi Hu, and Yujie Li
    2016 “How Anonymity Influence Self-Disclosure Tendency on Sina Weibo: An Empirical Study.” Anthropology: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cherry, Roger D.
    1988 “Politeness in Written Persuasion.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90020‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90020-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cialdini, Robert B.
    2007 Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2009 Influence: Science and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Citera, Maryalice
    1998 “Distributed Teamwork: The Impact of Communication Media on Influence and Decision Quality.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science (): –. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‑4571(199807)49:9<792::AID‑ASI4>3.0.CO;2‑K
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199807)49:9<792::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-K [Google Scholar]
  13. Cockroft, Robert, and Susan Cockroft
    2005 Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss
    2015 Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dafouz-Milne, Emma
    2008 “The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dayter, Daria
    2014 “Self-Praise in Microblogging.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubrovsky, Vitaly J., Sarah Kiesler, and Beheruzu N. Sethna
    1991 “The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups.” Human Computer Interaction ():–. 10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dutchler, Kirk William
    2001 “The Influence of Peripheral Cues on the Processing of Persuasive Messages on the World Wide Web.” PhD dissertation. University of Kentucky.
  19. Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    1992 “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, Derek
    1997 Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221785
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221785 [Google Scholar]
  21. Foss, Sonja K., and Cindy L. Griffin
    1995 “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs (): –. 10.1080/03637759509376345
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345 [Google Scholar]
  22. French, John. R. P., and Bertram Raven
    1960 “The Bases of Social Power.” InGroup Dynamics, ed. byDorwin Cartwright, and Alvin Zander, –. New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gass, Robert H., and John S. Seiter
    (eds) 2016 Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance-Gaining. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2017 “‘Whose Context Collapse?’: Ethical Clashes in the Study of Language and Social Media in Context.” Applied Linguistic Review: –. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1034
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1034 [Google Scholar]
  25. Guadagno, Rosanna E., and Robert B. Cialdini
    2002 “Online Persuasion: An Examination of Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Interpersonal Influence.” Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice. Special Issue on Internet Research: –. 10.1037/1089‑2699.6.1.38
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2009 “Online Persuasion and Compliance: Social Influence on the Internet and Beyond.” InThe Social Net: The Social Psychology of the Internet, ed. byRosanna E. Guadagno, Rober B. Cialdini, and Yair Amichai-Hamburger, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hale, Jerold L., and James P. Dillard
    1995 “Fear Appeals in Health Promotion Campaigns: Too Much, Too Little, or Just Right?” InDesigning Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice, ed. byEdward W. Maibach, and Roxanne L. Parrott, –. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 10.4135/9781452233451.n4
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233451.n4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hardin, William G., Mingzhi Hu, and Zhenguo Lin
    2023 “Culture, Wealth, Gender, Real Estate, and Consumption in China: It’s a Boy.” Journal of Estate Research (): –. 10.1080/08965803.2022.2045053
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08965803.2022.2045053 [Google Scholar]
  29. Harwit, Eric
    2017 “WeChat: Social and Political Development of China’s Dominant Messaging App.” Chinese Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757 [Google Scholar]
  30. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov
    2010 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyland, Ken, and Feng Jiang
    2021 “Our Striking Results Demonstrate…: Persuasion and the Growth of Academic Hype.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.018 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hymes, Dell
    1972 “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics, ed. byJohn Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, –. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ilie, Cornelia
    2006 “Classical Rhetoric.” InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. byKeith Brown, –. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/04305‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04305-4 [Google Scholar]
  35. Issa, Sadam
    2015 “A Socio-Pragmatic Investigation of the Persuasive Strategies in ‘Al-IttijāH Al-MuʿāKis’ (‘The Opposite Direction’) on Al-Jazeera TV.” Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.6.4.03iss
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.4.03iss [Google Scholar]
  36. Jalilifar, Alireza, Soheil Saidian, and Said Nazari
    2021 “‘Boom! You Bought Them’: A Metalinguistic Analysis of Apple Infomercials Based on Aristotle’s Modes of Persuasion.” Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.18055.jal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18055.jal [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones, Edwards E.
    1964 Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208344.2.77
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.2.77 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ma, Ringo, and Rueyling Chuang
    2001 “Persuasion Strategies of Chinese College Students in Interpersonal Contexts.” Southern Communication Journal (): –. 10.1080/10417940109373206
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940109373206 [Google Scholar]
  41. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2013 “Just Click ‘Like’: Computer-Mediated Responses to Spanish Compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  42. Marin-Arrese, Juana I.
    2021 “Stance, Emotion and Persuasion: Terrorism and the Press.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.022 [Google Scholar]
  43. Marwell, Gerald, and David R. Schmitt
    1967 “Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Behavior: An Empirical Analysis.” Sociometry: –. 10.2307/2786181
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2786181 [Google Scholar]
  44. Matheson, Kimberly, and Mark P. Zanna
    1989 “Persuasion as a Function of Self-Awareness in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Social Behaviour: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mckenna, Katelyn Y. A., and John A. Bargh
    2000 “Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology.” Personality & Social Psychology Review (): –. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 [Google Scholar]
  46. Miller, Gerald R., and Michael Burgoon
    1978 “Persuasion Research: Review and Commentary.” Annals of the International Communication Association (): –. 10.1080/23808985.1978.11923715
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1978.11923715 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mulholland, Joan
    2005 Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Natali, Carlo
    (ed) 2009 Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Natsheh, Bayan Robin
    2019 “Social Media as a Tool of Persuasion in Political Marketing: Analyzing the Discourse of Trump’s Tweets during His Presidential Campaign.” MA thesis. Hebron University, Palestine.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Orts, María Ángeles
    2016 “Power Distance and Persuasion: The Tension between Imposition and Legitimation in International Legal Genres.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pfau, Michael, and Roxanne Parrott
    1992 Persuasive Communication Campaigns. Boston: Pearson College Division.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Poggi, Isabella
    2005 “The Goals of Persuasion.” Pragmatics & Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.13.2.04pog
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.13.2.04pog [Google Scholar]
  53. Ran, Yongping
    2011 “当代语用学研究的跨学科多维视野[Multidimensional Features of Contemporary Pragmatics].” Foreign Language Teaching and Research (): –
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rank, Hugh
    1988 Persuasion Analysis: A Companion to Composition. Parkforest: Counter-Propaganda Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ren, Wei, and Yaping Guo
    2020 “Self-Praise on Chinese Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rohr, MTR. V.
    2018 “Persuasion in Smoking Cessation Online: An Interpersonal Pragmatics Perspective.” PhD dissertation. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
  57. Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan
    2011 “When Laughter Is Not Enough. Responding to Teasing and Self-Denigrating Humour at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  59. Seiler, Michael J., Zhang Yang, and Linlin, Zhao
    2019 “The Effect of Real Estate Ownership on Subjective Wellbeing.” Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management (): –. 10.1080/10835547.2020.1791646
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2020.1791646 [Google Scholar]
  60. Seiter, John S., and Robert H. Gass
    2011 “A Rationale for Studying Persuasion.” InPersuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance-Gaining, ed. byRobert H. Gass, and John S. Seiter, –. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Siegel, Jane, Vitaly Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, and Timothy W. McGuire
    1986 “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes (): –. 10.1016/0749‑5978(86)90050‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6 [Google Scholar]
  62. Simons, Herbert W.
    1976 Persuasion: Understanding, Practice and Analysis. New York: Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  64. Statista
    Statista 2023 “Most Popular Social Networks Worldwide as of October 2023, Ranked by Number of Monthly Active Users.” (Retrieved16-12-2023viahttps://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/)
  65. Tracy, Karen, and Jessica S. Robles
    2013 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Herck, Rebecca, Sofie Decock, and Bernard De Clerck
    2020 “‘Can You Send Us a PM Please?’ Service Recovery Interactions on Social Media from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100445
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100445 [Google Scholar]
  67. Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari
    2005 “Persuasion across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” InPersuasion across Genres, ed. byHelena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.130.03vir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130.03vir [Google Scholar]
  68. Weisband, Susanna P.
    1992 “Group Discussion and First Advocacy Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision Making Groups.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes: –. 10.1016/0749‑5978(92)90070‑N
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-N [Google Scholar]
  69. Wilson, E. Vance
    2003 “Perceived Effectiveness of Interpersonal Persuasion Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Computers in Human Behavior (): –. 10.1016/S0747‑5632(03)00006‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00006-2 [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu, Xing, He Huang, Ting Jiang, and Yuanpeng, Zou
    2020 “WeChat Usernames: An Exploratory Study of Users’ Selection Practices.” Names (): –. 10.1080/00277738.2020.1758493
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2020.1758493 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yu, Chuanpeng, Zhengang Zhang, Chunpei Lin, and Yenchun Jim Wu
    2020 “Can Data-Driven Precision Marketing Promote User Ad Clicks? Evidence from Advertising in WeChat Moments.” Industrial Marketing Management: –. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, Lei, and Carlton Clark
    2019 Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication. New York & London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22062.he
Loading
China’s real estate agents’ persuasion realizations on WeChat Moments
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22062.he
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22062.he
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22062.he
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: WeChat Moments ; rhetoric ; real estate agents ; cyberspace ; persuasion strategy

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error