1887
image of Metaphors to describe sanctions against Iran in American and Iranian newspapers
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since Iran’s 1979 revolution, Sanctions Against Iran (SAI) has been one of the most crucial issues concerning Iran and the US’ relationships, and both parties employ different metaphors to depict the situation in line with their own ideologies. This study explored the conceptual metaphors (CM) concerning the sanctions against Iran in two corpora of the editorials and news extracted from an international American newspaper () and a local Iranian English press (). Following Charteris-Black’s (2004) framework for Critical Metaphor Analysis, sixty editorial news texts (thirty for each), since 2013 until 2021, were scrutinized for the CMs in the two corpora. The findings revealed that although both newspapers took advantage of the metaphors in description of the sanctions against Iran, there were significant differences between them in the employment of the CMs. The American newspaper enjoyed more frequent and diverse metaphors to represent the sanctions compared to the Iranian newspaper, and “SAI is a pain/illness” (22.7%) was the most frequent conceptual metaphor in the whereas “SAI is a human” (32.4%) and “SAI is a journey” (18.9%) were the common metaphors in . The results suggest how language could be manipulated to serve different purposes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22069.moh
2024-05-14
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ansah, Gladys Nyarko
    2014 “Culture in Embodied Cognition: Metaphorical/Metonymic Conceptualizations of FEAR in Akan and English”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2014.859483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.859483 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bratoz, Silva
    2012 “Slovenian and US Elections in Metaphors: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective”. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, Lynne
    2007 “Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk”. Discourse and Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926507073376
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376 [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2005Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chi, Amy
    2016 “A Review of Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English”. Lexicography (): –. 10.1007/s40607‑015‑0023‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-015-0023-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fallah, Nahid, and Mohammad Raouf Moini
    2016 “A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Arab Uprisings in The Washington Post and Keyhan Editorials”. Metaphor and the Social World (): –. 10.1075/msw.6.1.04fal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.04fal [Google Scholar]
  11. Farahani, Ali Akbar, and Zohreh Adeli Jam
    2019 “The Role of Metaphorical Language in the Critical Discourse Analysis of Western Political Texts”. Journal of Language and Translation (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Farrokhi, Farahman, Ali Akbar Ansarin, and Somayeh Ashrafi
    2019 “A Comparative Study of Conceptual Metaphors in English and Persian Newspapers”. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. George, Darren, and Paul Mallery
    2019IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429056765
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, Colin, and Paul Kinnear
    2012IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Made Simple. Aberdeen: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203723524
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723524 [Google Scholar]
  15. He, Qingshun, and Bingjun Yang
    2018 “A Corpus-Based Study of the Correlation between Text Technicality and Ideational Metaphor in English”. Lingua: –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Zoltan
    2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2020Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2021 “Standard and Extended Conceptual Theory Revisited: Some Definitional and Taxonomic Issues”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byWen Xu, and John R. Taylor, –. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-14 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, George
    1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. InMetaphor and Thought, ed. byAndrew Ortony, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
    Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (6th ed.) 2014 Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  23. Macmillan English Dictionary
    Macmillan English Dictionary 2009 New Delhi: Macmillan Education Limited
  24. Nartey, Mark
    2018 “Football in Computer-Mediated Discourse: A Move Analysis of Match Reviews”. Linguistik Online (): –. 10.13092/lo.89.4274
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.89.4274 [Google Scholar]
  25. Nordquist, Richard
    2018 “What Is Personification?” ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-personification-1691766 (accessedDecember 6, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group 2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  27. Reddy, Michael
    1979 “The Conduit Metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco
    2020 “Understanding Figures of Speech: Dependency Relations and Organizational Patterns”. Language and Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Steen, Gerard
    2007 “Finding Metaphor in Discourse: Pragglejaz and Beyond”. Culture, Language, and Representation: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Suárez-Campos, Laura, Alberto Hijazo-Gascón, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
    2019 “Metaphor and Spanish as a Foreign Language”. InMetaphor in Foreign Language Instruction, ed. byAna Piquer-Píriz, and Rafael Alejo-González, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110630367‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110630367-005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1995 “Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials”. In4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought, Athens, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yu, Ning, Lu Yu, and Yue Christine Lee
    2017 “Primary Metaphors: Importance as Size and Weight in a Comparative Perspective”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1384276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1384276 [Google Scholar]
  34. Zibin, Aseel
    2020 “A Corpus-Based Study of Metaphors Used to Describe Syrian Refugees in Jordanian Politico-Economic Discourse: A Critical Metaphor Analysis Approach”. Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.17037.zib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17037.zib [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22069.moh
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.22069.moh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error