1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

is a mixed-genre entertainment programme transmitted in Ecuador on a national television channel. The segment of the programme that we examine in this paper focuses on gossip and events surrounding local/national celebrities. Talk as entertainment is central to this segment which is structured around a series of ‘news’ stories announced by the presenters and mostly conveyed through (pre-recorded) interviews. Extracts of these interviews are ingeniously presented to create a sense of confrontation between the celebrities concerned. Each news story is then followed-up by informal ‘discussions’ among the show’s 5-6 presenters who take on the role of panellists. While incorporates various genres, the running thread throughout the programme is the creation of scandal and the instigation of confrontation. What is of particular interest, however, is that no sooner the scandalous stories are presented, the programme presenters attempt to defuse the scandal and controversy that they contributed to creating. The programme thus results in what viewers familiar with the genre of confrontational talk shows in Spain, for example, may regard as an emasculated equivalent. In this paper we explore linguistic and other mechanisms through which confrontation and scandal are first created and then defused in . We consider the situational, cultural and socio-political context of the programme as possibly playing a part in this disjointedness. The study draws on the literature on television discourse, talk shows and (im)politeness in the media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23.1.06pla
2013-01-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abril, Gonzalo
    (1995) La televisión hiperrealista. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación1: 93-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Artículo 18 de la Constitución se contrapone al 13 de la CIDH. Hoy.com.ec., 4July 2011 Available at: ecuador/articulo-18-de-la-constitucion-se-contrapone-al-13-de-la-cidh-485338.html) (Accessed 10 July 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Zeʾev, Aaron
    (1994) The vindication of gossip. In R.F. Goodman , and A. Ben-Zeʾev (eds.), Good gossip. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, pp. 11-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernhardt, Eva
    (2006) Intensificación y atenuación en relación con cortesía y descortesía en un talk show de la televisión española. In M. Schrader-Kniffki (ed.), La cortesía en el mundo hispánico. Nuevos contextos, nuevos enfoques metodológicos. Madrid / Frankfurt: Iberoamericana / Vervuert, pp. 43-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    (2000) Gossipy events at family dinners: Negotiating sociability, presence and the moral order. In J. Coupland (ed.), Small talk. London: Longman, pp. 213-240.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , Juliane House , and Gabriele Kasper
    (1989) The CCSARP coding manual. In S. Blum-Kulka , J. House , and G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 273-294.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenes Peña, Ester
    (2011) Tertulia televisiva y descortesía verbal. Análisis pragmalingüístico. Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carbaugh, Donal A
    (1988) Talking American: Cultural discourses on Donahue. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp. doi: 10.1080/08934218809367460
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934218809367460 [Google Scholar]
  9. Castañeda, Iván
    , Unpublished interview with Marco Jácome, Quito, 6June 2012.
  10. Cebrián Herreros, Mariano
    (1998) Información televisiva: Mediaciones, contenidos, expresión y programación. Madrid: Síntesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corominas, Joan , and José Antonio Pascual
    (1981) Diccionario crítico-etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television qui show: ‘The Weakest Link’. Journal of Politeness Research1.1: 35-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dávila, Luis
    . En suspenso la Ley de Comunicación en Ecuador. Radio Nederland Wereldomroep Latinoamérica, 17April 2012 Available at: www.rnw.nl/espanol/article/en-suspenso-la-ley-de-comunicaci%C3%B3n-en-ecuador-0 (Accessed on20 May 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eggins, Suzanne , and Diana Slade
    (1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. El programa Vamos con todo se convierte en un ‘ring de pelea’. Hoy.com.ec, 2April 2009 Available at: www.hoy.com.ec/noticias-ecuador/el-programa-vamos-con-todo-se-convierte-en-un-ring-de-pelea-341307.html (Accessed on5 November 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fairclough, Norman
    (1995) Media discourse. London/New York: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    (2003) Declining an invitation: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish. Multilingua22: 225–255. doi: 10.1515/mult.2003.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2006) Linguistic politeness in Mexico: Refusal strategies among male speakers of Mexican Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics38: 2158-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuentes Rodrígues, Catalina
    (2009) Cuando la descortesía se convierte en agresividad. Las listas de debate en el correo electrónico. In D. Bravo , N. Hernández , and A. Cordisco (eds.), Aportes pragmáticos, sociopragmáticos y socioculturales a los estudios de la cortesía en español. Buenos Aires: EDICE/Dunken, pp. 321-359.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina , and Lara Esperanza Alcaide
    (2008) (Des)cortesía, agresividad y violencia verbal en la sociedad actual. Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina , and María Elena Placencia
    (2013) Polémica y/o descortesía en programas televisivos de crónica social en Ecuador y España: El caso de Vamos con todo y Sálvame Diario . In C. Fuentes Rodríguez (ed.), (Des)cortesía para el espectácolo: Estudios de pragmática variacionista. Madrid: Arco/Libros, pp. 127-165.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gamboa Cetina, José
    (2001) La mujer en los talk shows. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social42.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. García Gómez, Antonio
    (2000) Discourse, politeness and gender roles: An exploratory investigation into British and Spanish talkshow verbal conflicts. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense8: 97–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2008) Conversación de contacto en la tele-realidad: ¿"Telebasura" o texto social? Oralia11: 57-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gregori Signes, Carmen
    (1998) The overall structure of the American tabloid talkshow. Studies in English Language and LinguisticsXXX: 73-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2000) A genre based approach to daytime talk on television. SELL monographs1. Valencia: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Grindstaff, Laura
    (2002) The money shot: Trash, class, and the making of TV talk shows. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226309088.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226309088.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W.B
    (2007) (Pseudo-)argumentation in TV-debates. Journal of Pragmatics39: 1360-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Honorato, Liliana
    . Gobiernos arbitrarios e intolerantes dificultan a la prensa en Latinoamérica, dice la SIP. Blog Periodismo en las Américas, 23April 2012 Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas, University of Texas at Austin. Available at: knightcenter.utexas.edu/es/blog/00-9844-gobiernos-arbitrarios-e-intolerantes-dificultan-la-prensa-en-latinoamerica-dice-la-sip (Accessed 20 May 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hutchby, Ian
    (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ilie, Cornelia
    (1998) Questioning is not asking: The discursive functions of rhetorical questions in American talk shows. Texas Linguistic Forum39: 122-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Imbert, Gérard
    (2005) Telebasura. De la telerrealidad a la teleficción. El País Digital10/01/2005. Available atwww.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Telebasura/telerrealidad/teleficcion/elpepis (Accessed on10 November 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jurado Vargas, Romel
    (2010) Derecho a la comunicación en Ecuador: Avances, dificultades y expectativas. Mediaciones para el análisis y la lectura crítica de los medios. Centro Internacional de Estudios Superiores de Comunicación para América Latina (CIESPAL). Available atwww.ciespal.net/mediaciones/index.php/ensayos/237-derecho-a-la-comunicacion-en-ecuador-avances-dificultades-y-expectativas-.html (Accessed20 May 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Livingstone, Sonia and Lunt, Peter
    (1994) Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
    (2007) (Im)politeness and the Spanish media: The case of audience participation debates. In M.E. Placencia , and C. García (eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish-speaking world. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 145-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2009) Television discourse: Analysing language in the media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Los Simpson, and Ball Dragon, vetados. Hoy.com.ec., 2July 2009 Available at: www.hoy.com.ec/noticias-ecuador/los-simpson-y-dragon-ball-vetados-356068.html (Accessed 1 March 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mincer, Richard , and Deanne Mincer
    (1982) The talk show book: An engaging primer on how to talk your way to success. New York: Facts on File Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Munson, Wayne
    (1993) All talk: The talkshow in media culture. Philadelphia, PA.: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: www.etymonline.com (Accessed on19 March 2011).
  41. Placencia, María Elena
    (2008) (Non)compliance with directives among family and friends: Responding to social pressure and individual wants. Intercultural Pragmatics 5.3: 315-344. doi: 10.1515/IPRG.2008.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2008.015 [Google Scholar]
  42. Relatora de la OEA preocupada por proyecto de ley de comunicación. Hoy.com.ec, 9December 2009 Available at: www.hoy.com.ec/noticias-ecuador/relatora-de-la-oea-preocupada-por-proyecto-de-ley-de-comunicacion-381584.html (Accessed on20 May 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Requeijo Rey, Paula
    (2011) La telerrealidad a través del cine: Crónicas de Sebastián Cordero. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Estudios de la Comunicación Iberoamericana (SEECI)24: 54-76. Available at: www.ucm.es/info/seeci/Numeros/Numero24/InicioN24.html) (Accessed on10 November 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Richardson, Kay , and Ulrike H. Meinhof
    (1999) Worlds in common?Television discourses in a changing Europe. London / New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sibilia, Paula
    (2008) La intimidad como espectáculo. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    (2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking:Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 11-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor, Gabriele
    (1994) Gossip as moral talk. In R.F. Goodman , and A. Ben-Ze’ev (eds.), Good gossip. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, pp. 34-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Teleamazonas clausurado 3 días. Ecuadorenvivo.com, 22December 2009 Available at: www.ecuadorenvivo.com/2009122243286/sociedad/teleamazonas_clausurado_3_dias.html (Accessed on20 May 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Timberg, Bernard , and Bon Erler
    (2002) Television talk: A history of the TV talk show. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Venuti, Lawrence
    (1998) The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference. London/New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203269701
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203269701 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yépez Martínez, Hugo
    . Ley de Comunicación: ¿límite o mordaza? Realidad Ecuador. Blog de opinión: Política, economía y derecho en Ecuador, 1August 2011 Available at: www.realidadecuador.com/2011/08/ley-de-comunicacion-limite-o-mordaza.html (Accessed on1 June 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23.1.06pla
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error