Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


By articulating the notions of reflexivity and participant roles in the context of direct reported speech, the present study aims to contribute to a better understanding of discourse and interaction in storytelling events. Direct reported speech, I find, counts as a reflexive resource not only because it re-presents other speech, but also because it frames the activity of the metanarrator, as attested by the embedding of overtly reflexive elements (instances of direct reported speech, indirect reported speech and performative verbs) and the display of implicitly reflexive processes such as word search, repair and lexical choice. I arrive at the conclusion that those explicitly reflexive resources -such as metanarrative comments- which involve the momentary suspension of the reporting speech, occur only in extreme cases in which the audience’s understanding of the narrative is in risk from the teller’s perspective. Otherwise, the tendency prevails to keep direct reported speech consistent with the position and point of view of the corresponding figure.The narratives analyzed here were recorded in Spanish among bilingual Totonac-Spanish storytellers from three different villages of the Mexican State of Veracruz.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Austin, J
    (1962) How to Do Things With Words. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Babcock, Barbara
    (1977) The story in the story: Metanarration in folk narrative. In R. Bauman (ed.), Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Mass.: Newburry House, pp. 61-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M.M
    (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauman, Richard
    (1986) Story, Performance and Event. Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620935
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620935 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1992) Contextualization, tradition, and the dialogue of genres. Icelandic legends of the kraftaskáld. In Ch. Goodwin , and A. Duranti (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124-145.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004) A World of Others’ Words: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470773895
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773895 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauman, R. , and Ch. Briggs
    (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 59-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowles, Hugo
    (2010) Storytelling and Drama. Exploring Narrative Episodes in Plays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/lal.8
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lal.8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Briggs, Charles L
    (1986) Learning How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165990
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165990 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, Richard
    (1998) A variable syntax of speech, gesture and sound effect: Direct quotation in Spanish. Language variation and change10.1: 43-83. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500001216
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001216 [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, James
    (1998) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (book review). American ethnologist 25.1: 15–16. doi: 10.1525/ae.1998.25.1.15
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1998.25.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chafe, Wallace
    (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Du Bois, John W
    (2001) Towards a dialogic syntax. Unpublished manuscript.
  14. Downing, Pamela
    (1980) Factors influencing lexical choice in narrative. In W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of language production. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 89-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hickman, Maya
    (1993) The boundaries of reported speech in narrative discourse: Some developmental aspects. In J.A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63-90. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill, J. , and J. Irvine
    (1993) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hymes, Del
    (1975) Breakthrough into performance. In Dan Ben-Amos , and K.S. Goldstein (eds.), Folklore: performance and communication. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 11-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1981) In Vain I Tried to Tell You. Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Irvine, Judith T
    (1996) Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In M. Silverstein , and G. Urban (eds.), Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jakobson, Roman
    (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Th. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350-377.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaworski, Adam , et al
    (2004) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2004) Metalanguage: Why now? In A. Jaworski , et al . Metalanguage: social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3-7. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377 [Google Scholar]
  24. Labov, William
    (1972) The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov , Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 354-396.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lucy, John
    (ed.) (1993) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Introduction, pp. 1-32. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2001) Reflexivity. In A. Duranti (ed.), Key terms in language and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 208-210.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McCormick, Charlie T. , and K. Kennedy
    (1998) Folklore: An Encyclopedia of Beliefs, Customs, Tales, Music, and Art. Volume 2. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mannheim, B. , and D. Tedlock
    (1995) The Dialogic Emergence of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mayes, Patricia
    (1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language14: 325-363. doi: 10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may [Google Scholar]
  30. Oropeza-Escobar
    (2001) Participant roles and storytelling: Description of a narrating event in a rural community in Eastern Mexico. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva
    (2010) La elección léxica en narrativa oral tradicional: Una primera aproximación. In M. Bortoluzzi , and W. Jacorzynsi (coord.), El hombre es el fluir de un cuento: Antropología de las narrativas. México: CIESAS, pp. 23-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2011) Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.204
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.204 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tannen, Deborah
    (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Voloshinov, V.N
    (1986) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wierzbicka, Anna
    (1974) The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics7: 267–307. doi: 10.1080/08351817409370375
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351817409370375 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error