1887
image of Prosodic features of polite speech
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper uses interactional data to investigate the acoustic characteristics of polite or deferential speech in Korean. We asked fourteen Korean speakers to perform two tasks with two different interlocutors: a status superior and a friend. Consistent with previous studies of non-interactional data, deferential speech has lower pitch and shimmer, and quieter final syllables. However, divergent from previous studies, deferential speech featured higher jitter (in some locations), higher shimmer and higher H1-H2 (on one task). Through analysis of different locations in prosodic structure, we found that females used more pitch variation on final syllables in deferential speech. We argue that these mixed results show the importance of context in signalling vocal politeness, and also complexities of using interactional data. The findings advance the study of multimodal politeness beyond the analysis of experimental data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23003.bro
2024-05-06
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Anne H., Miles Bader, Ellen Gurman Bard, Elizabeth Boyle, Gwyneth Doherty, Simon Garrod, Stephen Isard, Jacqueline Kowtko, Jan McAllister, and Jim Miller
    1991 “The HCRC Map Task Corpus”. Language and Speech (): –. 10.1177/002383099103400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099103400404 [Google Scholar]
  2. Astruc, Lluisa, Maria del Mar Vanrell, and Pilar Prieto
    2016 “Cost of the Action and Social Distance Affect the Selection of Question Intonation in Catalan”. InIntonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields, edited byMeghan E. Armstrong, Nicholas Henriksen, and Maria del Mar Vanrell, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.6.05ast
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.6.05ast [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4”. Journal of Statistical Software (): –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenik
    2017 “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer”. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Lucien
    2011Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.206
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.206 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2022 “Linguistic Politeness”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Korean as a Second Language, edited byAndrew Sangpil Byon, and Danielle Ooyoung Pyun, –. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003034704‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034704-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Lucien, Iris Hübscher, and Andreas Jucker
    2023 “Multimodal Im/Politeness: Introduction”. InMultimodal Im/Politeness: Signed, Spoken, Written, edited byAndreas Jucker, Iris Hübscher, and Lucien Brown, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.333.01bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.333.01bro [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Lucien, Iris Hübscher, Hyunji Kim, and Bodo Winter
    2023 “Indexing Social Distance through Bodily Visual Practices in Two Languages”. InMultimodal Im/Politeness: Signed, Spoken, Written, edited byAndreas Jucker, Iris Hübscher, and Lucien Brown, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.333.05bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.333.05bro [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Lucien, Hyunji Kim, Iris Hübscher, and Bodo Winter
    2023 “Gestures Are Modulated by Social Context: A Study of Multimodal Politeness across Two Cultures”. Gesture (): –. 10.1075/gest.20034.bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20034.bro [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Lucien, Hyunji Kim, and Bodo Winter
    2022 “Is It Polite to Hiss?: Nonverbal Sound Objects as Markers of (Im) Politeness in Korean”. Frontiers in Communication: . 10.3389/fcomm.2022.854066
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.854066 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Lucien, and Pilar Prieto
    2017 “(Im)Politeness: Prosody and Gesture”. InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Z. Kádár, –. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_14 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2021 “Gesture and Prosody in Multimodal Communication”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, edited byMichael Haugh, Daniel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.023 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter
    2019 “Multimodal Indexicality in Korean: “Doing Deference” and “Performing Intimacy” through Nonverbal Behavior”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0042 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, Lucien, Bodo Winter, Kaori Idemaru, and Sven Grawunder
    2014 “Phonetics and Politeness: Perceiving Korean Honorific and Non-Honorific Speech through Phonetic Cues”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown, Penelope
    2015 “Politeness and Language”. InThe International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (IESBS), 2nd Ed., –. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53072‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bryant, Gregory A.
    2011 “Verbal Irony in the Wild”. Pragmatics & Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.19.2.06bry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.2.06bry [Google Scholar]
  18. Bryant, Gregory A., and Jean E. Fox Tree
    2002 “Recognizing Verbal Irony in Spontaneous Speech”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Caballero, Jonathan A., Nikos Vergis, Xiaoming Jiang, and Marc D. Pell
    2018 “The Sound of Im/Politeness”. Speech Communication: –. 10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Aoju, Carlos Gussenhoven, and Toni Rietveld
    2002 “Language-Specific Uses of the Effort Code”. InProceedings Speech Prosody 2002, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002‑39
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-39 [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi, Jiyoun, Sahyang Kim, and Taehong Cho
    2020 “An Apparent-Time Study of an Ongoing Sound Change in Seoul Korean: A Prosodic Account”. Plos One (): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0240682
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240682 [Google Scholar]
  22. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link”. Journal of Politeness Research: . 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferrand, Carole T.
    2002 “Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio: An Index of Vocal Aging”. Journal of Voice (): –. 10.1016/S0892‑1997(02)00123‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00123-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fougeron, Cécile, and Patricia A. Keating
    1996 “Articulatory Strengthening in Prosodic Domain-Initial Position”. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Freeman, Valerie
    2014 “Hyperarticulation as a Signal of Stance”. Journal of Phonetics: –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Charles Goodwin, and Malcah Yaeger-Dror
    2002 “Multi-Modality in Girls’ Game Disputes”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00078‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grawunder, Sven, Marianne Oertel, and Cordula Schwarze
    2014 “Politeness, Culture, and Speaking Task–Paralinguistic Prosodic Behavior of Speakers from Austria and Germany”. InProceedings Speech Prosody 2014, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑20
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-20 [Google Scholar]
  30. Herraiz, Empar Devís, and Francisco José Cantero Serena
    2014 “The Intonation of Mitigating Politeness in Catalan”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2014‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
  31. Holliday, Jeffrey, Abby Walker, Mihyun Jung, and Esther Sung Ryun Cho
    2023 “Bringing Indexical Orders to Non-Arbitrary Meaning: The Case of Pitch and Politeness in English and Korean”. Laboratory Phonology (): –. 10.16995/labphon.9112
    https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.9112 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hübscher, Iris, Joan Borràs-Comes, and Pilar Prieto
    2017 “Prosodic Attenuation Characterizes Formal Register in Catalan Requests”. Journal of Phonetics: –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua: –. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  34. Idemaru, Kaori, Bodo Winter, and Lucien Brown
    2019 “Cross-Cultural Multimodal Politeness: The Phonetics of Japanese Deferential Speech in Comparison to Korean”. Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0027 [Google Scholar]
  35. Idemaru, Kaori, Bodo Winter, Lucien Brown, and Grace Eunhae Oh
    2020 “Loudness Trumps Pitch in Politeness Judgments: Evidence from Korean Deferential Speech”. Language and Speech (): –. 10.1177/0023830918824344
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918824344 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ito, Mika
    2004 “Politeness and Voice Quality-the Alternative Method to Measure Aspiration Noise”. InProceedings Speech Prosody 2004, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004‑49
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-49 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeon, Hae-Sung
    2014 “The Perception of Korean Boundary Tones by First and Second Language Speakers”. InProceedings Speech Prosody, edited byNick Campbell, Dafyd Gibbon, and Daniel Hirst, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑180
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-180 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015 “Prosody”. InThe Handbook of Korean Linguistics, edited byLucien Brown, and Jaehoon Yeon, –. Malden, MA: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jun, Sun-Ah
    2018The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429454943
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454943 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kádár, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kiesling, Scott Fabius
    2009 “Style as Stance: Stance as the Explanation for Patterns of Sociolinguistic Variation”. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited byAlexandra Jaffe, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie
    2010 “A High Boundary Tone as a Resource for a Social Action: The Korean Sentence-Ender–Ta”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.022 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim, Hyunji, Bodo Winter, and Lucien Brown
    2021 “Beyond Politeness Markers: Multiple Morphological and Lexical Differences Index Deferential Meanings in Korean”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, Minju
    2018 “From Connective to Final Particle: Korean Tunci “Or” and Cross-Linguistic Comparisons”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
    2001 “Change in Korean Honorifics Reflecting Social Change”. InLanguage Change in East Asia, edited byThomas McAuley, –. London: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lee, Ho-Young
    1990Kwukewunyullon [Korean Prosody]. Seoul: Hankwukyenkwuwen [Korean Study Institute].
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee, Tae-Seung, Mikyong Park, and Tae-Soo Kim
    2005 “Toward More Reliable Emotion Recognition of Vocal Sentences by Emphasizing Information of Korean Ending Boundary Tones”. InProceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference. 10.1007/11548706_32
    https://doi.org/10.1007/11548706_32 [Google Scholar]
  48. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Loveday, Leo
    1981 “Pitch, Politeness and Sexual Role: An Exploratory Investigation into the Pitch Correlates of English and Japanese Politeness Formulae”. Language and Speech (): –. 10.1177/002383098102400105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400105 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mason, Paul H., Bodo Winter, and Andrea Grignolio
    2015 “Hidden in Plain View: Degeneracy in Complex Systems”. Biosystems: –. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  51. McKinnon, Sean, and Pilar Prieto
    2014 “The Role of Prosody and Gesture in the Perception of Mock Impoliteness”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2014‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2014-0009 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mondorf, Britta
    2011Gender Differences in English Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nagata, Takashi
    2022 “Japanese Honorifics”. InHandbook of Japanese Sociolinguistics, edited byYoshiyuki Asahi, Mayumi Usami, and Fumio Inoue, –. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501501470‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501501470-011 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ofuka, Etsuko, J. Denis McKeown, Mitch G. Waterman, and Peter J. Roach
    2000 “Prosodic Cues for Rated Politeness in Japanese Speech”. Speech Communication (): –. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(00)00009‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00009-1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Oh, Eunhae, and Mao Cui
    2020 “The Acquisition of Acoustic Correlates of Politeness by Native Chinese Speakers”. Linguistic Research: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Oh, Eunhae, Bodo Winter, and Kaori Idemaru
    2021 “Korean Speakers Hyperarticulate Vowels in Polite Speech”. Malsoli-Wa Umsengkwahak (Phonetics and Speech Sciences) (): –. 10.13064/KSSS.2021.13.3.015
    https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2021.13.3.015 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ohala, John J.
    1984 “An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F₀ of Voice”. Phonetica (): –. 10.1159/000261706
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261706 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ohara, Yumiko
    2001 “Finding One’s Voice in Japanese: A Study of the Pitch”. InMultilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender, edited byAneta Pavlenko, Adrian Blackledge, Ingrid Piller, and Marya Teutsch-Dwyer, –. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889406.231
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889406.231 [Google Scholar]
  59. Orozco, Leonor
    2008 “Peticiones Corteses y Factores Prosódicos”. InFonología Instrumental. Patrones Fónicos y Variación, edited byZ. E. Herrera, and P. Martín Butragueño, –. México D.F: El Colegio de México.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2010 “Estudio Sociolingüístico de La Cortesía En Tratamientos y Peticiones. Datos de Guadalajara”. PhD dissertation. El Colegio de México.
  61. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2009 “Expressing Oneself in Conversational Interaction”. InExpressing Oneself/Expressing One”s Self: Communication, Cognition, Language, and Identity, edited byEzequiel Morsella, –. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Park, Mee-Jeong
    2012The Meaning of Korean Prosodic Boundary Tones. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Rockwell, Patricia
    2000 “Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (): –. 10.1023/A:1005120109296
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120109296 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sherr-Ziarko, Ethan
    2019 “Prosodic Properties of Formality in Conversational Japanese”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association (): –. 10.1017/S0025100318000117
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100318000117 [Google Scholar]
  65. Singmann, Henrik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall, Frederik Aust, and Mattan S. Ben-Shachar
    2015 “Afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments”. R Package Version 0.13–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Stadler, Stefanie Alexa
    2006 “Multimodal (Im)Politeness: The Verbal, Prosodic and Non-Verbal Realization of Disagreement in German and New Zealand English”. PhD disseration. The University of Auckland.
  67. Stanford, James N.
    2010 “Gender, Generations, and Nations: An Experiment in Hmong American Discourse and Sociophonetics”. Language & Communication (): –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2010.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wichmann, Anne
    2000 “The Attitudinal Effects of Prosody, and How They Relate to Emotion”. InISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Speech and Emotion. Belfast: Textflow.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Winter, Bodo, and Sven Grawunder
    2012 “The Phonetic Profile of Korean Formal and Informal Speech Registers”. Journal of Phonetics (): –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  70. Winter, Bodo, Grace Eunhae Oh, Iris Hübscher, Kaori Idemaru, Lucien Brown, Pilar Prieto, and Sven Grawunder
    2021 “Rethinking the Frequency Code: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Role of Acoustic Body Size in Communicative Phenomena”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (): . 10.1098/rstb.2020.0400
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0400 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23003.bro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23003.bro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Korean ; prosody ; multimodality ; Politeness ; social distance ; power ; gender
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error