1887
image of Identity in guanxi space
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article argues that identity among the Chinese is operated and must be interpreted in space, which is the essence of identity in Chinese culture. This can be further summarized as identity in space, i.e., identity is regulated and operated in the sphere of the four-dimensional quadrants of vertical and horizontal axes. This article thus claims the following about the model of identity in the space: it embodies the interpersonal, pragmatic characteristics of Chinese culture; it overcomes (to some extent) the neglect of the third party in previous pragmatic analyses; and it constitutes the contribution of indigenous Chinese culture to international pragmatic studies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23017.yua
2025-04-25
2025-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ameka, Felix K., and Marina Terkourafi
    2019 “What If…? Imagining Non-Western Perspectives on Pragmatic Theory and Practice.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
    2006Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. 10.1515/9780748626533
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan, Wing-Tsit 陈荣捷
    1969A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang, Hui-Ching, and Richard Holt
    1994 “A Chinese Perspective on Face as Inter-Relation Concern.” InThe Challenge of Facework, ed. byStella Ting-Toomey, –. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Jing, and Xin Zhao
    2023 “An Empirical Study of Chinese University Student Advisors’ Dynamic Identity Construction in the Context of Individual Consultation.” Pragmatics: –. 10.1075/prag.21005.che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21005.che [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Xinren
    2018 “On the Construction of Chinese Disciplinary Discourse System of Pragmatics.” Foreign Language Education: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung, Wai Keung, and Gary Hamilton
    2001 “Social Logic as Business Logic: Guanxi, Trustworthiness and the Embeddedness of Chinese Business Practices.” InRules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions, ed. byRichard P. Appelbaum, William L. F. Felstiner, and Volkmar Gessner, –. Oxford: Hart.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fei, Xiaotong
    1985Earthbound China. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, Wenjing, and Xinren Chen
    2020 “Identity (Self-)Deconstruction in Chinese Police’s Civil Conflict Mediation.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.19039.fen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19039.fen [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao, Shiqi 高士奇
    1979 Zuozhuan jishiben左转记事本末 [The Event-Based Historical Records of Tso Chuan]. Beijing: China Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2013 “Introduction-Face, Identity and Im/Politeness: Looking Backward, Moving Forward from Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifanou
    2017 “(Im)Politeness and Identity.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes: –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanks, William, Sachiko Ide, and Yasuhiro Katagiri
    2009 “Towards an Emancipatory Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ho, David Yau-fai
    1976 “On the Concept of Face.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/226145
    https://doi.org/10.1086/226145 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, Pingsheng, and Meng Zhang 胡平生 张萌
    2017 Liji Yizhu礼记译注 [Translation and Annotation of the Book of Rites]. Beijing: China Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, Guangguo
    1987 “Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/228588
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228588 [Google Scholar]
  21. Joseph, John E.
    2013 “Identity Work and Face Work Across Linguistic and Cultural Boundaries.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
  22. King, Ambrose Yeo-chi
    1991 “Kuanhsi and Network Building: A Sociological Interpretation.” Daedalus (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, Chengtuan, Yongping Ran, and Daniel Kádár
    2018 “Constructing Self-Expert Identity via Other-Identity Negation in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse.” Text and Talk (): –. 10.1515/text‑2018‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Qiang
    1993Social Stratification and Mobility in Contemporary China. Beijing: Economic Press China.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang, Shuming
    1987Eastern and Western Cultures and Their Philosophies. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Markus, Hazel R., and Shinobu Kitayama
    1991 “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological Review (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mey, Jacob
    2012 “Anticipatory Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller, Elizabeth R.
    2013 “Positioning Selves, Doing Relational Work and Constructing Identities in Interview Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Qin, Xuqin
    2006Good Eloquence is Wealth: Selected Essays of Wang Xijie. Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
    2018 “A New Interpersonal Relationship Model Based on Renqing Principle: A Grassroots Perspective on Interpersonal Pragmatics.” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eno, Robert
    2016Mencius: An Online Teaching Translation. https://hdl.handle.net/2022/23421
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation (Volumes I and II). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2000 “Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport.” InCulturally Speaking. Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. byHelen Spencer-Oatey, –. London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781350934085.ch‑002
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934085.ch-002 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research: –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  35. Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke
    2000 “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly (): –. 10.2307/2695870
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tajfel, Henri
    1978Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tracy, Karen
    2002Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tracy, Karen, and Jessica S. Robles
    2013Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Turner, John C.
    2010 “Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior.” InRediscovering Social Identity, ed. byTom Postmes, and Nyla R. Branscombe, –. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yan, Yunxiang
    1996 “The Culture of Guanxi in a North China Village.” The China Journal: –. 10.2307/2950274
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2950274 [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, Guoshu
    2004A Localization Research on the Psychology and Behavior of Chinese. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang, Yiyin
    1995 “On Interpersonal Relationship and Its Classification.” Sociological Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yuan, Zhou-min
    2011 “The Study of Identity from the Social Psychological and Pragmatic Perspective.” Foreign Language Research: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2018 “Exploring Chinese College Students’ Construction of Online Identity on the Sina Microblog.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2020 “Identity Rhetoric in Chinese Radio-Mediated Medical Consultation.” Eastern Asian Pragmatics: –. 10.1558/eap.39001
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.39001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Yuan, Zhou-min, Hao Wang, and Li Yang
    2024 “Chinese University Faculty Supervisors’ Academic Identity Construction in Online Profiles.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications: –. 10.1057/s41599‑024‑02938‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02938-1 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhai, Xuewei
    1993 “The Characteristics of Chinese Interpersonal Relationship: An Indigenous Concept and Mode.” Sociological Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2011The Principles of Chinese Guanxi. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2017The Chinese Logic of Action. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2019 “Re-Understanding of ‘Mutual Concealment of Offenses by Kin’: Interpretation of the Theory of Relative Dimension.” Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute: –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23017.yua
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23017.yua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: indigenous study ; zun and qin ; identity ; guanxi space ; shenfen
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error