1887
image of Dual function of (inter)subjectivity in the use of well as a discourse marker
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that subjective elements emerge in the initial position of an utterance, known as the left periphery, whereas intersubjective elements typically emerge in the final position, referred to as the right periphery. However, this functional asymmetry is not invariably maintained. This study advances the argument that the discourse marker can serve a dual purpose, simultaneously expressing both a speaker’s subjectivity and intersubjectivity at the outset of an utterance, specifically on the left periphery. Essentially, indexes the speaker’s subjectivity mediated through intersubjectivity. Additionally, the study explores the intricate relationship between intersubjectivity and the textual function of as a discourse marker. This study reveals that intersubjective functions can contribute to the development of textual functions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23026.tak
2025-01-20
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, and Sandra A. Thompson
    2000Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, and Nii Martey
    2003Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aijmer, Karin
    2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aijmer, Karin, Ad Foolen, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    2006 “Pragmatic Markers in Translation: A Methodological Proposal.” InApproaches to Discourse Particles, ed. byKerstin Fischer, –. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780080461588_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_007 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    2003 “The Discourse Particle Well and its Equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics: –. 10.1515/ling.2003.036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.036 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beeching, Kate
    2016Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139507110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507110 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beeching, Kate, and Yu-Fang Wang
    2014 “Motivations for Meaning Shift at the Left and Right Periphery: Well, Bon, and Hao.” InDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, ed. byKate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges
    (eds) 2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
    1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” InStyle in Language, ed. byThomas Albert Sebeok, –. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, Deborah
    2001Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlson, Lauri
    1984“Well” in Dialogue Games: A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection “Well” in Idealized Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.v.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Defour, Tine
    2008 “The Speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of Well and Now as Pragmatic Markers.” English Text Construction: –. 10.1075/etc.1.1.06def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.06def [Google Scholar]
  16. Defour, Tine, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    2010 “‘Positive Appraisal’ as a Core Meaning of Well: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English Data.” English Studies: –. 10.1080/0013838X.2010.488849
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2010.488849 [Google Scholar]
  17. Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard
    2011 “Alors Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language: –. 10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg [Google Scholar]
  18. Dér, Csilla Ilona
    2010 “On the Status of Discourse Markers.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica: –. 10.1556/ALing.57.2010.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.57.2010.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit
    2014 “Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi : French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery.” InDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, ed. byKate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Du Bois, John W.
    2006 “Representing Discourse.” University of California, Santa Barbara. transcription.projects.linguistics.ucsb.edu/representing
  21. Fraser, Bruce
    2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics: –. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Haspelmath, Martin
    2004 “On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization.” InUp and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, ed. byOlga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.59.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.03has [Google Scholar]
  24. Lehmann, Christian
    2004 “Theory and Method in Grammaticalization.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  26. Onodera, Noriko O.
    2007 “Interplay of (Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics: –. 10.1075/jhp.8.2.05ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.2.05ono [Google Scholar]
  27. 2011 “Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. byBernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0050 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2014 “Setting Up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese.” InDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, ed. byKate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_006 [Google Scholar]
  29. Owen, Marion
    1981 “Conversational Units and the Use of ‘Well’.” InConversation and Discourse, ed. byPaul Werth, –. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schourup, Lawrence C.
    1985Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Takamura, Ryo
    2021 “A Motivation for Politeness from Interpersonal to Textual Mode: The Case of Well as a Discourse Marker.” Paper presented atthe 17th International Pragmatic Conference, Winterthur, Switzerland (virtual conference: Webex meeting), 27 June to 2 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2023Discourse Marker Well in Spoken American English: Some Suggestions for Politeness and Cross-Linguistics. Yokohama: Shumpusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  36. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1982 “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization.” InPerspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed. byWinfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  37. 1995 “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization.” Paper presented atICHL XII, Manchester, August 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1999 “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” Paper presented at theWorkshop on Historical Pragmatics, 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2003 “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” InMotives for Language Change, ed. byRaymond Hickey, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2010a “Grammaticalization.” InHistorical Pragmatics, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214284.3.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.3.97 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010b “(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment.” InSubjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. byKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2012 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction: –. 10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau [Google Scholar]
  43. 2014 “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause.” InDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, ed. byKate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_005 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, Yu-Fang, and Pi-Hua Tsai
    2005 “Hao in Spoken Chinese Discourse: Relevance and Coherence.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2004.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.04.002 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23026.tak
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: politeness ; well ; discourse marker ; textuality ; (inter)subjectivity ; periphery
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error