Brazilian Portuguese wh-clefts in a multilevel analytic perspective

References

1. Aleixo, Felipe
   2015 “Estrutura informacional e clivagem: Análise da veiculação de informação em construções clivadas do português brasileiro contemporâneo escrito. [Information structure and clefting: Analysis of information expression in cleft constructions of written contemporary Brazilian Portuguese].” MA thesis. State University of São Paulo. hdl.handle.net/11449/136077
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrade, Aroldo Leal de
   2019 “Assessing the Emergence of Reduced Clefts in Brazilian Portuguese: Rhetoric Structure, Information Structure and Syntax.” Revista Letras: –. 10.5380/rel.v99i1.65317
   https://doi.org/10.5380/rel.v99i1.65317 [Google Scholar]
3. Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
   2009 “Os usos do agora em elocuções formais e em entrevistas orais. [The uses of agora in formal speech and in oral interviews].” Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (): –. 10.17851/2237‑2083.17.2.189‑214
   https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.17.2.189-214 [Google Scholar]
4. Asher, Nicholas, Phillipe Muller, Myriam Bras, Lydia Mai Ho-Dac, Farah Benamara, Stergos Afantenos, and Laure Vieu
   2017 “ANNODIS and Related Projects: Case Studies on the Annotation of Discourse Structure.” InHandbook of Linguistic Annotation, ed. byNancy Ide, and James Pustejovsky, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑0881‑2_47
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_47 [Google Scholar]
5. Barbosa, Maria do Pilar Pereira
   2013 “As construções pseudoclivadas: perguntas e respostas. [Pseudocleft constructions: questions and answers].” InTextos Selecionados, XXVIII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística [Selected Texts, XXVIII National Meeting of the Portuguese Association of Linguistics], ed. byFátima Silva, Isabel Falé, Isabel Pereira, and João Veloso, –. Lisbon: Colibri/APL. https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BARBOSA_2013.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
6. Braga, Maria Luísa, Mary Kato, and Carlos Mioto
   2015 “As construções-Q no português brasileiro falado [Wh-constructions in spoken Brazilian Portuguese].” InGramática do português culto falado no Brasil, vol. 3 [Grammar of cultured Portuguese spoken in Brazil], ed. byMary Kato, and Milton do Nascimento, –. São Paulo: Fapesp/Contexto.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braga, Maria Luísa, Diego Leite de Oliveira, and Elisiene de Melo Barbosa
   2013 “Gradiência e variação nas construções de foco no português brasileiro [Gradience and variation in focus constructions in Brazilian Portuguese].” Cadernos de Letras da UFF (): –. 10.22409/cadletrasuff.2013n47a313
   https://doi.org/10.22409/cadletrasuff.2013n47a313 [Google Scholar]
8. Carlson, Lynn, and Daniel Marcu
   2001 Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Colléter, Maud, Cécile Fabre, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Maria Paule Péry-Woodey, Josette Rebeyrolle, and Ludovic Tanguy
   2012 “La ressource ANNODIS multi-échelle: guide d’annotation et bonus [The multilevel resource ANNODIS: annotation guide and bonus].” Carnets de grammaire. Technical report CLLE-ERSS. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Jean Jaurès.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Collins, Peter C.
    1991 Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Costa, João, and Inês Duarte
    2001 “Minimizando a estrutura: uma análise unificada das construções de clivagem em português [Minimizing the structure: a unified analysis of cleft constructions in Portuguese].” InActas do XVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, Coimbra, 2000 [Proceedings of the 16th National Meeting of the Portuguese Linguistics Association], ed. byClara Correia, and Anabela Gonçalves, –. Lisbon: APL/Colibri.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De Cesare, Anna-Maria
    2017 “Cleft Constructions.” InManual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, ed. byAndreas Dufter, and Elisabeth Starke, –. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-015 [Google Scholar]
13. Declerck, Renaat
    1988 Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven/Dordrecht: Leuven University Press/Foris. 10.1515/9783110869330
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869330 [Google Scholar]
14. Delin, Judy L.
    1990 “A Multilevel Account of Cleft Constructions in Discourse.” Proceedings of 13th Conference on Computational Linguistics: –. 10.3115/997939.997954
    https://doi.org/10.3115/997939.997954 [Google Scholar]
15. Delin, Judy, and Jon Oberlander
    1995 “Syntactic Constraints on Discourse Structure. The Case of It-Clefts.” Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/ling.1995.33.3.465
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.3.465 [Google Scholar]
16. Den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder
    2000 “Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis.” Studia Linguistica (): –. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00050
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00050 [Google Scholar]
17. Dufter, Andreas
    2009 “Clefting and Discourse Organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance.” InFocus and Background in Romance Languages, ed. byAndreas Dufter, and Daniel Jacob, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.112.05duf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.05duf [Google Scholar]
18. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
    2009 “La expresión del Verum Focus en español [The expression of verum focus in current-day Spanish].” Español Actual: –.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gast, Volker, and Natalia Levshina
    2014 “Motivating W(h)-Clefts in English and German: A Hypothesis-Driven Parallel Corpus Study.” InFrequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in Romance and Germanic: Contrastive, Corpus-Based Studies, ed. byAnna-Maria Cesare, –. Berlin/Munich/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110361872.377
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110361872.377 [Google Scholar]
20. Gast, Volker, and Daniel Wiechmann
    2012 “W(h)-clefts im Deutschen und Englischen. Eine quantitative Untersuchung auf Grundlage des Europarl-Korpus [W(h)-clefts in German and English. A quantitative study based on the Europarl corpus].” InDeutsch im Sprachvergleich. Grammatische Kontraste und Konvergenzen [Comparative German. Grammatical contrasts and convergences], ed. byLutz Gunkel, and Gisela Zifonun, –. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110284768.333
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110284768.333 [Google Scholar]
21. Gessler, Luke, Yang Liu, and Amir Zeldes
    2019 “A Discourse Signal Annotation System for RST Trees.” InProceedings of Discourse Relation Treebanking and Parsing (DISRPT 2019), –. Minneapolis: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W19‑2708
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2708 [Google Scholar]
22. Giora, Rachel
    2003 On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Givón, Talmy
    2001 Syntax, vol. 1. 2nd edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hedberg, Nancy
    1990 “Discourse Pragmatics and Cleft Sentences in English.” PhD dissertation. University of Minnesota. www.sfu.ca/~hedberg/Hedberg_1990_Dissertation_Complete.pdf
25. Hedberg, Nancy, and Lorna Fadden
    2007 “The Information Structure of It-Clefts, Wh-Clefts and Reverse Wh-Clefts in English.” InThe Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette Gundel, ed. byNancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.155.05hed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.155.05hed [Google Scholar]
26. Huddleston, Rodney
    1984 Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165785
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165785 [Google Scholar]
27. Klein, Wolfgang, and Christiane von Stutterheim
    1987 “Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen [Quaestio and referential movement in narratives].” Linguistische Berichte: –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Klima, Edward, and Ursula Bellugi-Klima
    1969 “Syntactic Regularities in the Speech of Children.” InModern Studies in English, ed. byDavid A. Reibel, and Sanford A. Schane, –. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Krifka, Manfred, and Renate Musan
    2012 “Information Structure: Overview and Linguistic Issues.” InThe Expression of Information Structure, ed. byManfred Krifka, and Renate Musan, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261608.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.1 [Google Scholar]
30. Lee, Chungmin
    2003 “Contrastive Topic and/or Contrastive Focus.” InJapanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 12, ed. byWilliam McClure. Stanford: CSLI. semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mQ5MW-MyY/jk12Lee.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lobo, Maria
    2006 “Assimetrias em construções de clivagem do português: movimento vs. geração na base [Asymmetries among Portuguese cleft constructions: movement vs. base-generation].” InTextos Selecionados, XXI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística [Selected Texts, XXI National Meeting of the Portuguese Association of Linguistics], ed. byJoaquim Barbosa, and Fátima Oliveira, –. Lisbon: Colibri/APL. https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2005-38.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1983 “Relational Propositions in Discourse.” Research Report 83–115, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1988 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Marcu, Daniel
    1999 Instructions for Manually Annotating the Discourse Structures of Texts. Ms. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Matthiessen, Christian, and Sandra A. Thompson
    1988 “The Structure of Discourse and ‘Subordination.’” InClause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. byJohn Haiman, and Sandra Thompson, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.12mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.12mat [Google Scholar]
36. Menuzzi, Sérgio
    2018 “Sobre a pressuposição das clivadas [On the presupposition of clefts].” Revista da Anpoll: –. 10.18309/anp.v1i46.1067
    https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i46.1067 [Google Scholar]
37. Prince, Ellen F.
    1978 “A Comparison of Wh-Clefts and It-Clefts in Discourse.” Language, –. 10.2307/413238
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413238 [Google Scholar]
38. Repp, Sophie
    2016 “Contrast: Dissecting an Elusive Information-Structural Notion and Its Role in Grammar.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, ed. byCaroline Féry, and Shinichiro Ishihara, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.006 [Google Scholar]
39. Riester, Arndt
    2019 “Constructing QuD trees” InQuestions in Discourse, vol 2: Pragmatics, ed. byMalte Zimmermann, Klaus von Heusinger, and Edgar Onea, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004378322_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378322_007 [Google Scholar]
40. Santos, Kátia Roseane Cortez
    2018 “Uma investigação funcionalista das relações retóricas do campo da avaliação no português falado [A functionalist investigation of rhetorical relations in the field of evaluation in spoken Portuguese].” MA thesis. State University of Maringá. https://docplayer.com.br/123991933-Universidade-estadual-de-maringa-centro-de-ciencias-humanas-letras-e-artes-programa-de-pos-graduacao-em-letras-mestrado-e-doutorado.html
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stede, Manfred, Maite Taboada, and Debopam Das
    2017 Annotation Guidelines for Rhetorical Structure. Ms., University of Potsdam and Simon Fraser University.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Thompson, Sandra A., and William C. Mann
    1987a “Antithesis: A Study in Clause Combining and Discourse Structure.” InLanguage Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, vol. 2, ed. byRoss Steele, and Terry Threadgold, –. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Thompson, Sandra A., and William C. Mann
    1987b “A Discourse View of Concession in Written English.” InProceedings of the Second Annual Pacific Linguistics Conference, ed. byScott C. DeLancey, and Russell S. Tomlin, –. Eugene: University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Von Heusinger, Klaus, and Petra Schumacher
    2019 “Discourse Prominence: Definition and Application.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025 [Google Scholar]
45. Weinert, Regina, and Jim Miller
    1996 “Cleft Constructions in Spoken Language.” Journal of Pragmatics, –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00079‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00079-4 [Google Scholar]