Towards a distinction between non-euphemistic and euphemism-based politically correct expressions

References

1. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge
   2006 Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
2. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association 2022a “Disability.” https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/disability?_ga=2.239701315.1961225062.1672569664-1795807778.1671185872 (accessed29 October 2022).
3. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association 2022b “Racial and Ethnic Identity.” https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/racial-ethnic-minorities (accessed15 November 2022).
4. Burridge, Kate
   2012 “Euphemism and Language Change: the Sixth and Seventh Ages.” Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology: –. 10.4000/lexis.355
   https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355 [Google Scholar]
5. Caplan, Gerald
   1964 Principles of Preventive Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cardichon, Jessica, and Linda Darling-Hammond
   2017 Advancing Educational Equity for Underserved Youth. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
8. Carston, Robyn
   2019 “Ad Hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon.” InRelevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. byKate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, –, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593.014
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.014 [Google Scholar]
9. Carston, Robyn
   2023 “The Relevance of Words and the Language/Communication Divide.” Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187343
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187343 [Google Scholar]
10. Carston, Robyn, and George Powell
    2008 “Relevance Theory – New Directions and Developments.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, ed. byErnie Lepore, and Barry C. Smith, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
11. “Circumlocution.”
    “Circumlocution.”n.d.InCollins Online Dictionary. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/circumlocution (accessed14 October 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Department for Education
    Department for Education 2023 “Special Educational Needs and Disability: An Analysis and Summary of Data Sources. June 2023.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1164690/Special_educational_needs_and_disability_an_analysis_and_summary_of_data_sources.pdf (accessed14 October 2023).
13. Dunn, Dana S., and Erin E. Andrews
    2015 “Person-First and Identity-First Language: Developing Psychologists’ Cultural Competence Using Disability Language.” American Psychologist (): –. 10.1037/a0038636
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636 [Google Scholar]
14. Ehly, Stewart
    1986 Crisis Intervention Handbook. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Felt, Christian, and Ellen Riloff
    2020 “Recognising Euphemisms and Dysphemisms Using Sentiment Analysis.” InProceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, ed. byBeata Beigman Klebanov, Ekaterina Shutova, Patricia Lichtenstein, Smaranda Muresan, Chee Wee, Anna Feldman, and Debanjan Ghosh, –. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 10.18653/v1/2020.figlang‑1.20
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.figlang-1.20 [Google Scholar]
16. Gernsbacher, Morton A., Adam R. Raimond, M. Theresa Balinghasay, and Jilana S. Boston
    2016 ““Special Needs” Is an Ineffective Euphemism.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications: . 10.1186/s41235‑016‑0025‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0025-4 [Google Scholar]
17. Halmari, Helena
    2011 “Political Correctness, Euphemism and Language Change. The Case of “People First”.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.016 [Google Scholar]
18. Hoff, Lee Ann
    1978 People in Crisis: Understanding and Helping. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Holder, R. W.
    2002 How Not to Say What You Mean: A Dictionary of Euphemisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hughes, Geoffrey
    2010 Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Luchtenberg, Sigrid
    1985 Euphemismen im Heutigen Deutsch. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mackey, Richard
    1968 “Crisis Theory: Its Development and Relevance to Social Casework Practice.” The Family Coordinator (): –. 10.2307/582257
    https://doi.org/10.2307/582257 [Google Scholar]
23. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
    Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. n.d. “YouthBuild Program.” https://mn.gov/deed/job-seekers/find-a-job/targeted-services/youth-employment/youthbuild.jsp (accessed10 December 2022).
24. Neurodiversity Hub
    Neurodiversity Hub. n.d. “What Is Neurodiversity?” https://www.neurodiversityhub.org/what-is-neurodiversity (accessed10 April 2023).
25. O’Neill, Ben
    2011 “A Critique of Politically-Correct Language.” Independent Review (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Parker, Emily, and Michael Griffith
    2016 The Importance of At-Risk Funding. Policy Analysis. Education Commission of the States.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pinker, Steven
    1994 “The Game of the Name.” New York Times, April5. pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/1994_04_03_newyorktimes.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
28. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Roper, Cynthia
    2022 “Political Correctness.” InEncyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-correctness (accessed15 August 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rosen, Alan
    1997 “Crisis Management in the Community.” The Medical Journal of Australia (): –. 10.5694/j.1326‑5377.1997.tb138919.x
    https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138919.x [Google Scholar]
31. Sexual Assault Kit Initiative
    Sexual Assault Kit Initiative. n.d. “Victim or Survivor: Terminology through Investigation to Prosecution.” https://sakitta.rti.org/toolkit/index.cfm?fuseaction=tool&tool=80 (accessed15 November 2022).
32. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    2015 “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy: –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sytnyk, Andriy
    2014 “Argumentative Euphemisms, Political Correctness and Relevance”. PhD disseration. University of Neuchâtel.
35. The Fortune Society
    The Fortune Society. n.d. “Words Matter: Using Humanising Language.” https://fortunesociety.org/wordsmatter/ (accessed15 November 2022).
36. “Visually Impaired.”
    “Visually Impaired.”n.d.InCollins Online Dictionary. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/visually-impaired (accessed30 October 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Yus, Francisco
    2013 “Analysing Jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of Humorous Communication.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/lpp‑2013‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
38. Yus, Francisco
    2018 “Attaching Feelings and Emotions to Propositions: Some Insights on Irony and Internet Communication.” Russian Journal of Linguistics (): –. 10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑1‑94‑107
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-94-107 [Google Scholar]
39. Wilson, Deirdre
    2011 “Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Lagellonicae Cracoviensis: –. 10.2478/v10148‑011‑0025‑1
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10148-011-0025-1 [Google Scholar]
40. Wilson, Deirdre
    2016 “Relevance Theory.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    (eds) 2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
42. A Proclamation on World Autism Awareness Day, 2023
    A Proclamation on World Autism Awareness Day, 2023. Published31 March 2023. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/03/31/a-proclamation-on-world-autism-awareness-day-2023/ (accessed1 April 2023).
43. Emergency Funding to Support Most Vulnerable in Society during Pandemic
    Emergency Funding to Support Most Vulnerable in Society during Pandemic. Published2 May 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/emergency-funding-to-support-most-vulnerable-in-society-during-pandemic (accessed10 November 2022).
44. Library Services for Blind and Visually Impaired People
    Library Services for Blind and Visually Impaired People. Published16 December 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/library-services-for-blind-and-visually-impaired-people (accessed10 November 2022).
45. President Biden’s Budget Invests in Reducing Gun Crime to Make Our Communities Safer
    President Biden’s Budget Invests in Reducing Gun Crime to Make Our Communities Safer. Published28 March 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2022/03/28/fact-sheet-president-bidens-budget-invests-in-reducing-gun-crime-to-make-our-communities-safer/ (accessed20 August 2022).
46. President Biden’s FY 2023 Budget Advances Equity
    President Biden’s FY 2023 Budget Advances Equity. Published30 March 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2022/03/30/president-bidens-fy-2023-budget-advances-equity/ (accessed20 August 2022).
47. Supporting Disabled People through the Coronavirus Outbreak
    Supporting Disabled People through the Coronavirus Outbreak. Published31 March 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-disabled-people-through-the-coronavirus-outbreak/supporting-disabled-people-through-the-coronavirus-outbreak (accessed10 November 2022).
48. Technology Unlocks Cities for Visually Impaired
    Technology Unlocks Cities for Visually Impaired. Published21 May 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/technology-unlocks-cities-for-visually-impaired (accessed10 November 2022).
49. The Biden-⁠Harris Administration Advances Equity and Opportunity for Black Americans and Communities Across the Country
    The Biden-⁠Harris Administration Advances Equity and Opportunity for Black Americans and Communities Across the Country. Published06 November 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/11/06/the-biden-harris-administration-advances-equity-and-opportunity-for-black-americans-and-communities-across-the-country/ (accessed15 December 2022).