1887
image of Semantic and pragmatic properties of post-truth discourse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Social media discourse is characterized by the post-truth phenomenon, in which feelings and personal beliefs appear to exert greater influence on shaping public opinions than truth. In such cases, the truth of news may be blurred and reported events are often reversed along revelations of the facts. Reverse news on social media is, in a sense, a typical instance of post-truth discourse. This study attempts to provide a corpus-based description of attitude appraisal and illocutionary acts in reverse news on social media, with the aim of investigating semantic and pragmatic properties of post-truth discourse. The corpora for this study consist of social media posts in Chinese and English about a defamation lawsuit, which were collected from Weibo and Facebook.

The results indicate that the English corpus emphasizes the use of appreciations and judgments with more complex co-occurring relations among three attitudinal domains while the Chinese corpus contains more judgments than appreciations and affects. Meanwhile, both corpora exhibit higher frequencies of assertives and expressives than the other acts, yet the Chinese corpus presents more complicated illocutionary act sequences than the English corpus. After the verdict, the frequencies of both attitude appraisal and illocutionary acts decrease in the Chinese corpus but increase in the English corpus. Based on this, we propose that the development of post-truth discourse may go through three functional stages: starting with expression, progressing to appeal, and ending with representation. The sequence of these stages may vary depending on sociocultural contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23053.san
2025-01-17
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmad, Amirah, Norizah Ardi, and Rozaimah Rashidin
    2021 “Speech Acts in Trials of Underage Sexual Criminal Case.” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal (): –. 10.21834/ebpj.v6iSI5.2922
    https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v6iSI5.2922 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Mwzaiji, Khaled Nasser Ali
    2021 “The Political Spin of Conviction: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Origin of COVID-19.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies (): –. 10.17576/gema‑2021‑2101‑14
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-14 [Google Scholar]
  3. Angermuller, Johannes
    2018 “Truth After Post-Truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies.” Palgrave Communication (): –. 10.1057/s41599‑018‑0080‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin, John Langshaw
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.1007/BF00188849
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188849 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bühler, Karl
    2011Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carretero, Marta, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, M. Ángeles Martínez
    2015 “An Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-Oriented Interaction by University Students.” Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.051
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.051 [Google Scholar]
  7. Csardi, Gabor
    2013 “Package igraph.” cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf. Accessed10 May 2023.
  8. Ge, Mingsi
    2020 “‘后真相’时代网络民粹主义主导舆论的机制及其治理 [The mechanism and governance of public opinion led by internet populism in the ‘post-truth’ era].” Dong Yue Tribune (): –. 10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2020.05.034
    https://doi.org/10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2020.05.034 [Google Scholar]
  9. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1973Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harsin, Jayson
    2018 “Post-Truth and Critical Communication Studies.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.757
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.757 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalmanovitch, Yshai
    2021 “A Pragmatic Analysis of Descriptive, Depictive and Simulative Reporting Speech Acts: Empirical Evidence from a Prosodic Study on Conversational Modern Israeli Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalpokas, Ignas
    2019 “Affective Encounters of the Algorithmic Kind: Post-Truth and Posthuman Pleasure.” Social Media + Society (): –. 10.1177/2056305119845678
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119845678 [Google Scholar]
  13. Keyes, Ralph
    2004The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kreitner, Richard
    2016 “Post-Truth and Its Consequences: What a 25-Year-Old Essay Tells Us About the Current Moment.” The Nation. 30 Nov. 2016; Accessed5 Oct. 2022. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/post-truth-and-its-consequences-what-a-25-year-old-essay-tells-us-about-the-current-moment/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lei, Yuejie, and Li Si
    2019 “‘反转新闻’视角下新闻真实性再探 [Further exploration of news authenticity from the perspective of ‘reverse news’].” Youth Journalist (): –. 10.15997/j.cnki.qnjz.2019.15.009
    https://doi.org/10.15997/j.cnki.qnjz.2019.15.009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, and John Cook
    2017 “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the ‘Post-Truth’ Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (): –. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Liang, Weishan., and Shisheng Liu
    2019 “新闻叙事中的‘后真相’现象及其语篇分析 [The ‘post-truth’ phenomenon in news narratives: a case study].” Foreign Languages Research (): –. 10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2019.04.029
    https://doi.org/10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2019.04.029 [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Lihua
    2010评价理论研究 [Studies of appraisal theory]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Luporini, Antonella
    2021 “Metaphor, Nominalization, Appraisal: Analyzing Coronavirus-Related Headlines and Subheadings in China Daily and The Wall Street Journal.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies (): –. 10.17576/gema‑2021‑2101‑15
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-15 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma, Yuan
    2018 “批评性话语分析视角下反转新闻的话语表达与意义建构 [Discourse expression and meaning construction of reverse news from the perspective of critical discourse analysis].” Jiang-huai Tribune (): –. 10.16064/j.cnki.cn34‑1003/g0.2018.01.020
    https://doi.org/10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2018.01.020 [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, James R.
    2000 “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. bySusan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, James R., and David Rose
    2007Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. 2nd ed.London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohamad, Azweed, Radzuwan Ab Rashid, Kamariah Yunus, et al
    2018 “Speech Acts in the Facebook Status Updates Posted by an Apostate.” International Journal of English Linguistics (): –. 10.5539/ijel.v8n4p226
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p226 [Google Scholar]
  25. McDermott, Rose
    2019 “Psychological Underpinnings of Post-Truth in Political Beliefs.” PS-Political Science & Politics (): –. 10.1017/S104909651800207X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800207X [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruotsalainen, Juho, Jaana Hujanen, and Mikko Villi
    2021 “A Future of Journalism Beyond the Objectivity — Dialogue Divide Hybridity in the News of Entrepreneurial Journalists.” Journalism (): –. 10.1177/1464884919867216
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919867216 [Google Scholar]
  27. Qiao, Fang, Kexin Jiang
    2022 “Attitudes Towards Global Warming on Twitter.” Journal of Global Information Management (): –. 10.4018/JGIM.296708
    https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.296708 [Google Scholar]
  28. Safavi, Sarvenaz
    2021 “Bühler’s Organon Model of Communication: A Semiotic Analysis of Advertising Slogans.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2018‑0028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0028 [Google Scholar]
  29. Searle, John. R.
    1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  30. Searle, John R.
    1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  31. Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
    1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1977aText and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1977b “Context and Cognition: Knowledge Frames and Speech Act Comprehension.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(77)90035‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90035-2 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446217856
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217856 [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Olmen, Daniël, and Vittorio Tantucci
    2022 “Getting Attention in different Languages: A Usage-Based Approach to Parenthetical Look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/ip‑2022‑2001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-2001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Waisbord, Silvio
    2018a “The Elective Affinity Between Post-Truth Communication and Populist Politics.” Communication Research and Practice (): –. 10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928
    https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2018b “Truth Is What Happens to News: On Journalism, Fake News, and Post-Truth.” Journalism Studies (): –. 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881 [Google Scholar]
  38. White, Peter R. R.
    2015 “Appraisal Theory.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, –. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041 [Google Scholar]
  39. Zeng, Xiangmin, and Jinrong Dai
    2020 “新媒体语境下新闻反转、舆论生成机制和治理路径探究——基于2014-2020年典型反转新闻事件的定性比较分析(QCA)研究 [Research on reversal news, public opinion generation mechanism and governance path in the context of new media — Based on the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) study of typical reversal news events from 2014 to 2020].” Journal of Social Sciences (): –. 10.13644/j.cnki.cn31‑1112.2020.07.018
    https://doi.org/10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2020.07.018 [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Lushan
    2020 “浅析网络自媒体环境下的反转新闻现象 [Analysis of the reverse news phenomenon in the network self-media environment].” Southeast Communication (): –. 10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35‑1274/j.2020.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35-1274/j.2020.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Yanni, Naveed Akhtar, Qamar Farooq, Yiwei Yuan, and Irfan Ullah Khan
    2022 “Comparative Study of Chinese and American Media Reports on the Covid-19 and Expressions of Social Responsibility: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (): –. 10.1007/s10936‑021‑09809‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09809-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, Luolin, and Nicholas John
    2020 “The Concept of ‘Sharing’ in Chinese Social Media: Origins, Transformations and Implications.” Information, Communication & Society: –. 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1791216
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1791216 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23053.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.23053.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: post-truth ; social media ; linguistic properties ; reverse news
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error