1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Volume 24, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
PDF

Abstract

Laughter is primarily a social phenomenon and used as a resource for managing social relationships and identities. While it is often unplanned and uncensored, laughter is also strategically produced at particular moments to accomplish particular goals in interaction. In this article, I examine the ways in which laughter – specifically, what I call – is utilized to manage the face-threatening relational aspects of disagreements rather than to deal with the actual content of disputes. The four specific functions of coping laughter that I analyze are (1) face-threat mitigation, (2) face-loss concealment, (3) serious-to-nonserious frame switch, and (4) topic transition facilitation. Which of these functions are accomplished varies depending on several contextual factors, including who initiates the laughter, how other participants respond to the laughter, and the overarching context and participant roles at play in the interaction. I discuss each of these influencing factors and the associated interactional functions of coping laughter in relation to the data I analyze. I argue that coping laughter is an efficient and effective strategy for dealing with the interactional trouble caused by a disagreement without dealing with its content.

© 2014 International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.1.07war
2015-03-01
2023-06-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.1.07war
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adelsward, V. , and B. Oberg
    (1998) The function of laughter and joking in negotiation activities. Humor11.4: 411-429. doi: 10.1515/humr.1998.11.4.411
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.4.411 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, J. , and J. Heritage
    (eds.) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, G
    (1954) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwell, S
    (2003) What’s in a pear film narrative? Framing and the power of expectation in Spanish. Spanish in Context6.2: 249-300. doi: 10.1075/sic.6.2.05bla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.6.2.05bla [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, P. , and S. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chafe, W
    (2007) The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling behind Laughter and Humor. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ceb.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman, A. , and H. Foot
    (eds.) (1996) Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. Piscataway, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coates, J
    (1996) Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2007) Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics39: 29-49. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Bois, J
    (2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.139-182. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  11. (2010) Representing discourse. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Glenn, P
    (1983) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication53: 127-149. doi: 10.1080/10570318909374296
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374296 [Google Scholar]
  13. Glenn, P.J
    (1989) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Communication53.2: 127-149. doi: 10.1080/10570318909374296
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374296 [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenn, P
    (1992) Current speaker initiation of two-party shared laughter. Research on Language and Social Interaction25: 139-162. doi: 10.1080/08351819109389360
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819109389360 [Google Scholar]
  15. Glenn, P.J
    (2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
  16. Glenn, P
    (2010) Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics42.6: 1485-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, E
    (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Haakana, M
    (2010) Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences. Journal of Pragmatics42.6: 1499-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heritage, J
    (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Holt, E
    (2010) The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics42.6: 1513-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holtgraves, T
    (2005) Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research1: 73-93.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hutchby, I. , and R. Wooffitt
    (1998) Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jefferson, G
    (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp.79-95.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Atkinson , and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.346-369.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jefferson, G. , H. Sacks , and E. Schegloff
    (1977) Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Pragmatics Microfiche. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Locher, M. , and R. Watts
    (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research1: 9-33.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Markaki, V. , S. Merlino , L. Mondada , and F. Oloff
    (2010) Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke. Journal of Pragmatics42.6: 1526-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mills, S
    (2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
  31. Norrick, N. , and A. Spitz
    (2008) Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics40.10: 1661-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Driscoll, J
    (2007) What’s in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research3: 243-268.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pomerantz, A
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. Atkinson , and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.79-112.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Potter, J
    (1997) Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy , and A. Bryman (eds.), Handbook of data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers, pp.610-623.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Provine, R
    (2000) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. New York: Viking.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sacks, H
    (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button , and J. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation: Multilingual matters. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp.54-69.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sacks, H. , E. Schegloff , and G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 697-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schiffrin, D. , D. Tannen , and H. Hamilton
    (2003) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Spencer-Oatey, H
    (2005) (Im)Politeness, face, and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and relationships. Journal of Politeness Research1: 95-119.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Ten Have, P
    (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wood, L. , and R. Kroger
    (2000) Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.1.07war
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Context; Disagreement; Face; Framing; Interpersonal; Laughter

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error