1887
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) has to date been explicitly oriented to modelling the grammar of the individual speaker, with the Contextual Component being seen as supportive. If FDG is re-interpreted as dialogic, the Contextual Component emerges as being shared by all interactants in the dialogue and as playing a central role in interaction. A dialogic FDG is proposed to provide a basis for understanding the role of interpersonal alignment in conversation as well as reflecting developments in psycholinguistics. It is applied to the analysis of eight extracts from a dialogue transcription in Eggins and Slade (2005).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.2.04mac
2015-06-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnold, Jennifer E
    (2008) Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes23: 495-527. doi: 10.1080/01690960801920099
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960801920099 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakker, Dik
    (1999) FG expression rules: From templates to constituent structure. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 67. University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2001) The FG expression rules: A dynamic model. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses42: 15-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2005) Agreement: More arguments for the dynamic expression model. In Casper de Groot , and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.1-40. doi: 10.1515/9783110920833.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920833.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bargh, John
    (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology36: 147-168. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.336
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.336 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bock, J. Kathryn
    (1996) Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review3: 395-421. doi: 10.3758/BF03214545
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214545 [Google Scholar]
  7. Branigan, Holly P. , Martin J. Pickering , and Alexandra A. Cleland
    (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition75: B13-B25. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00081‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, Noam
    (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Andy
    (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Herbert H
    (1996) Using Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, Herbert H. , and Deanna Wilkes-Gibb
    (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition22: 1-39. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(86)90010‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Connolly, John H
    (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa51/2: 11-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . (this volume)The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics24.2: 229-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eggins, Suzanne , and Diana Slade
    (2005) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferreira, Victor S. , and J. Kathryn Bock
    (2006) The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes21: 1011-1029. doi: 10.1080/01690960600824609
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford, Cecilia E. , Barbara A. Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford , Barbara A. Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.14-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Giomi, Riccardo
    (this volume)Grammar, context and the hearer: A proposal for a hearer-based model of Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24.2: 275-296.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
    (2011) Lexical cohesion in multiparty conversations. Language Sciences33: 167-179. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grice, H. Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole , and Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3. New York: Academic Press, pp.41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, M.A.K. , and Ruqaiya Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasson, Uri , Asif A. Ghazanfar , Bruno Galantucci , Simon Garrod , and Christian Keysers
    (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences16/2: 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hengeveld, Kees
    (2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot , and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.53-86. doi: 10.1515/9783110920833
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920833 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hengeveld, Kees , and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. (this volume)Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24.2: 203-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Iacoboni, Marco
    (2005) Understanding others: Imitation, language, and empathy. In Susan Hurley , and Nick Chater (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp.77-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2008) Mirroring People: The New Science of how we Connect with Others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Isaac, Ellen A. , and Herbert H. Clark
    (1987) References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General116: 26-37. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.116.1.26
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.26 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kempson, Ruth , and Ronnie Cann
    (2007) Dynamic Syntax: Preliminaries for a dialogue-driven account of syntactic change. In Joseph C. Salmons , and Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.73-101. doi: 10.1075/cilt.284.08kem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.284.08kem [Google Scholar]
  29. Levelt, Willem J.M
    (1989) Speaking. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1999) A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown , and P. Hagoort (eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.83-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, Stephen C
    (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Linell, Per
    (2007) Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: Is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology?Language Sciences29: 605-620. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
    (2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences34: 421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pickering, Martin J. , and Victor S. Ferreira
    (2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin134/1: 427-459. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.134.3.427
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pickering, Martin J. , and Steven Garrod
    (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Poesio, Massimo , and Hannes Rieser
    (2010) Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. www.dialogue-and-discourse.org/, accessed 26 October 2011 .
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schober, Michael F. , and Susan E. Brennan
    (2003) Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In Arthur C. Graesser , Morton A. Gernsbacher , and Susan R. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.123-164.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tannen, Deborah
    (2006) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. (2nd edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Weigand, Edda
    (2010) Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.2.04mac
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error