The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This paper addresses two issues related to the overarching question of how to integrate Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) into a wider theory of verbal interaction (Hengeveld and Mackenzie 2008: 1). First, it proposes an addressee-oriented version of the Grammatical Component, presenting a first attempt to develop an FDG account of language comprehension; second, it aims to shed light on the interaction between the Grammatical and Contextual Components of FDG by exploring this crucial aspect of verbal communication from the perspective of the addressee.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. , and M. Schlesewsky
    (2009) Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, C
    (2008) Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences30.1: 1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, W
    (1994) Discourse, Conciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Connolly, J.H
    (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística51/2: 11-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . (this issue) The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics24.2: 229-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cornish, F
    (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In E. Keizer , and G. Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar82: 97-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2013) On the dual nature of the Functional Discourse Grammar model: Context, the language system/language use distinction, and indexical reference in discourse. Language Sciences38: 83-98. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. García Velasco, D
    (2007) Lexical competence and Functional Discourse Grammar. ALFA: Revista de Lingüística51.2: 165-187.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . (this issue) Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics24.2: 297-316.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurevich, O. , M. Johnson , and A.E. Goldberg
    (2010) Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition2.1: 45-78. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hengeveld, K. , and J.L. Mackenzie
    (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. (this issue) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24.2: 203-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Keizer, M.E
    (2007a) Possessive constructions in English: The proposal’s supporters or the supporters of the proposal?In M. Hannay , and G. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.59-82. doi: 10.1075/slcs.83.05kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.83.05kei [Google Scholar]
  14. (2007b) The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627699
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627699 [Google Scholar]
  15. . (this issue) Context and cognition in Functional Discourse Grammar: What, where and why?Pragmatics24.2: 399-423.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambrecht, K
    (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackenzie, J.L
    (2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences34: 421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. . (this issue) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics24.2: 249-273.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pickering, M.J. , and S. Garrod
    (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2005) Establishing and using routines during dialogue: Implications for psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.85-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. O’Neill, G
    . (this issue) Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã. Context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics24.2: 349-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van de Velde, F
    . (this issue) The discourse motivation of argument realization in nominalisations. Pragmatics24.2: 317-348.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Context; Discourse; Functional Discourse Grammar; Inference; Language parsing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error