The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Functional Discourse Grammar is characterized as the grammatical component of a wider theory of verbal interaction and is linked to two adjacent components: The Conceptual and the Contextual Components. One general property of these components is that they are not open-ended, but are said to contain only that extra-linguistic information which is relevant for the construction and interpretation of the immediate linguistic expression. In this contribution I explore the relation between context and grammar and I conclude that the FDG’s requirement that the Contextual Component should only contain those features which have a systematic impact on grammar is too strict. In particular, I claim that the Contextual Component is relevant in linguistic usage through speakers’ mental representation of its contents, which could be captured in the Conceptual Component. I further argue that the notions of ‘activation’ and ‘sharedness’ are relevant to understanding the motivation of two syntactic processes, subject raising and extraction from NPs, and should therefore find a place in the model even if they do not always lead to systematic effects. It is finally proposed that these pragmatic dimensions could find their way into the grammar by means of unmarked pragmatic configurations or content frames.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bolkestein, A. Machtelt
    (1998) What to do with Topic and Focus? Evaluating pragmatic information. In Mike Hannay , and A. Machtelt Bolkestein (eds.), Functional Grammar and Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.193-214. doi: 10.1075/slcs.44.14bol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.44.14bol [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, Christopher S
    (2008) Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff , and Daniel García Velascol (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.221-261.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2013) A reappraisal of the functional enterprise, with particular reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses67: 13-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, Wallace
    (1994) Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Connolly, John H
    (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa51: 11-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (this issue) The contextual component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics24:2. 229-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cornish, Francis
    (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In Evelien Keizer , and Gerry Wanders (eds.), Special Issue: The London papers I. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar, pp.97-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davison, Alice
    (1984) Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic. Language60: 797-846. doi: 10.1353/lan.1984.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dik, Simon C
    (1997a) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1. The Structure of the Clause. [ Kees Hengeveld (ed.)]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1997b) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Complex and Derived Constructions. [ Kees Hengeveld (ed.)]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110218374
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218374 [Google Scholar]
  11. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
    (2007) Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. García Velasco, Daniel
    (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar and extraction from (complex) noun phrases. In Jan Rijkhoff , and Daniel García Velasco (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.321-363.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) Raising in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie , and Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.249-276. doi: 10.1075/slcs.137.10vel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.137.10vel [Google Scholar]
  14. Givón, Talmy
    (1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1017/s0022226700010434
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700010434 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldberg, Adele E
    (2006) Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hengeveld, Kees
    (2004) Epilogue. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie , and María Ángeles Gómez González (eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.365-378. doi: 10.1515/9783110197112.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197112.365 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hengeveld, Kees , and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. (this issue) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24.2: 203-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Keizer, Evelien
    (this issue) Context and cognition in FDG: What, where and why?Pragmatics24.2: 399-423.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lambrecht, Knud
    (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
    (2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences34: 421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  22. (this issue) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics24.2: 249-273.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan , and Evelien Keizer
    (1991) On assigning pragmatic functions in English. Pragmatics1: 169-215.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mair, Christian
    (1990) Infinitival complement clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Noël, Dirk
    (1997) The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe. English Language and Linguistics1: 271-284. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000538
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000538 [Google Scholar]
  26. Postal, Paul M
    (1974) On Raising. One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prince, Ellen F
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp.223-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ross, John R
    (1986) [1967] Infinite Syntax. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company. First published as Constraints on variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smit, Niels
    (2007) Information packaging in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística51: 91-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vallduví, E
    (1993) The Informational Component. Standford: CSLI Dissertations.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Activation; Context; Functional Discourse Grammar; Givenness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error