1887
Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

French talk-in-interaction shows a recurrent patterning of utterances that can schematically be presented as [clause-NP-clause], as in (‘it is going to fade away the image it is going to fade away)’, where signals co-indexicality. In this pattern, the NP represents a pivot element which together with the preceding clause can be heard as forming a right dislocation ([clause-NP]), and together with the subsequent clause can be heard as forming a left dislocation ([NP-clause]). One interactionally consequential feature of the [clause-NP-clause] pattern is that it organizes specific types of units in specific ways during the temporal unfolding of talk: It allows speakers to proffer two subsequent predications about the same referent, typically within one TCU, whereby the temporally second predication may be either identical (mirror image-like pivot patterns) or different from the first. We demonstrate that speakers use the [clause-NP-clause] pivot pattern to accomplish a set of interactional jobs related to the management of repair, to stance taking, to the progressivity of talk, and to issues of recipiency. We also show that, recurrently, the pattern is configured on-line, following an emergent trajectory which is adapted to local interactional contingencies; this is what we refer to as (‘pivoting’), i.e. the grammatical shaping of pivot patterns ‘in the making’. Based on these findings, we argue that the [clause-NP-clause] pivot pattern testifies to the adaptive, emergent and thoroughly temporal nature of grammar.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.3.07hor
2015-09-01
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Apothéloz, Denis , and Françoise Zay
    (2003) Syllepses syntagmatiques dans l’improvisation orale. In F. Sánchez Miret (ed.), Actas del XXIII Congreso internacional de lingüística y filología románica, vol. II. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp.47-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter
    (1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen , and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.57-100. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text25.1: 7-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2007) Syntax als Prozess. In H. Hausendorf (ed.), Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion. Tübingen: Narr, pp.95-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2009) On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences31.1: 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auer, Peter , and Stefan Pfänder
    (2011) Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110229080
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080 [Google Scholar]
  7. Betz, Emma
    (2008) Grammar and interaction. Pivots in German conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.21 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bilmes, Jack
    (1991) Toward a theory of argument in conversation: The preference for disagreement. In F.H. Van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst , J.A. Blair , and C.A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sicsat. International centre for the study of argumentation, pp.462-469.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanche-Benveniste, Claire , Christine Rouget , and Sabio Frédéric
    (eds.) (2002) Choix de textes de français parlé: 36 extraits. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan
    (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clayman, Steven
    (2012) Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions. Journal of Pragmatics44: 1853-1867. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth , and Tsuyoshi Ono
    (eds.) (2007) Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective. Pragmatics 17.4, Special issue.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Stefani, Elwys , and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
    (2005) Interrogative structures in second language acquisition: The interactional resources of definition inquiries in French. Paper presented atthe 9th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA) in Riva del Garda (Italy), 10–15th July 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dovicchi, Francesca
    (2010) Costrutti-eco nell’italiano parlato. Da ‘ripetizione’ a ‘cardinalità’. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Drew, Paul , and Elisabeth Holt
    (1995) Idiomatic expressions and their role in the organization of topic transition in conversation. In M. Everaert et al. (eds.), Idioms. Structural and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pp.117-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1998) Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society27: 495-522. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500020200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020200 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ford, Cecilia E. , Barbara A. Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited. Pragmatics6.3: 427-454.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Franck, Dorothea
    (1985) Sentences in conversational turns: A case of syntactic ‘double bind’. In M. Dascal (ed.), Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.233-245. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.1.23fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.1.23fra [Google Scholar]
  19. Givón, Talmy
    (1983) Topic Continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1-41. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3.01giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodwin, Charles
    (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, pp.97-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2002) Time in Action. Current Anthropology43: 19-35. doi: 10.1086/339566
    https://doi.org/10.1086/339566 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holt, Elisabeth , and Paul Drew
    (2005) Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on Language and Social Interaction38.1: 35-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, Paul J
    (1987) Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Conference13: 139-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2004) The openness of grammatical constructions. Papers from the 40th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society40.2: 153-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer , and S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp.22-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie
    (2007) La dislocation à droite comme ressource pour l’alternance des tours de parole: Vers une syntaxe incrémentale. [Right-dislocation as a resource for turn-taking: Towards an incremental syntax]. TRANEL47: 117-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2012) La dislocation à droite revisitée: Une investigation interactionniste. [Right-dislocation revisited: A grammar-in-interaction account]. Thesis manuscript, University of Neuchâtel, March2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jefferson, Gail
    (1984) On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.M. Atkinson , and J.C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.191-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1991) List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (ed.), Interactional competence. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers, pp.63-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lambrecht, Knud
    (2001) Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.), La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques. Manuel international. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp.1050-1078.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindström, Jan
    (2012) Epistemic stance markers in turn initial and final position. Jag tycker and jag tror ‘I think’ in Swedish. Paper presented ata FRIAS Workshop, 16–17th May 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Linell, Per
    (2013) The dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building: Processes and resources. In B. Szczepek Reed , and G. Raymond (eds.), Units of Talk - Units of Actions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.57-90. doi: 10.1075/slsi.25.03lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.03lin [Google Scholar]
  33. Norén, Niklas
    (2007) Apokoinou in Swedish talk-in-interaction: A family of methods for grammatical construction and the resolving of local communicative projects. Linköping University: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Norén, Niklas , and Per Linell
    (2013) Pivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomena within a cross-linguistic perspective: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics54: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pekarek Doehler, Simona
    (2004) Une approche interactionniste de la grammaire: Réflexions autour du codage grammatical de la référence et des topics chez l’apprenant avancé d’une L2. AILE21: 123-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2011a) Clause-combining and the sequencing of actions: Projector constructions in French conversation. In R. Laury , and R. Suzuki (eds.), Subordination in conversation: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.103-148. doi: 10.1075/slsi.24.06doe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.24.06doe [Google Scholar]
  37. (2011b) Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of dislocated constructions in French conversation. In P. Auer , and S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.46-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pekarek Doehler, Simona , Elwys De Stefani , and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
    (2011) The grammar of closings: The use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in French talk-in-interaction. Nottingham French Studies50.2: 51-76. doi: 10.3366/nfs.2011‑2.003
    https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2011-2.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pekarek Doehler, Simona , and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
    (2013) The patching-together of pivots in talk-in-interaction: On ‘double dislocations’ in French. Journal of Pragmatics54: 92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Aktinson , and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, Harvey
    (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button , and J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon, U.K: Multilingual Matters, pp.54-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics of the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and Semantics12: 261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1987) Recycled turn-beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization. In G. Button , and J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp.70-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs , E.A. Schegloff , and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.52-133. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8.3: 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  48. Scheutz, Hannes
    (2005) Pivot constructions in spoken German. In A. Hakulinen , and M. Selting (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.103-128. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.07sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.07sch [Google Scholar]
  49. Tanaka, Hiroko
    (1999) Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.56 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2001) The implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japanese conversation: Complementizers as pivotal devices. In M. Selting , and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.81-109. doi: 10.1075/sidag.10.06tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.06tan [Google Scholar]
  51. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    (2012) Left-right asymmetries: The grammar of pro-repeat responses to informings in English Conversation. Paper presented ata FRIAS Workshop, 1617th May 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walker, Gareth
    (2002) Phonetic and interactional detail of a turn-holding practice: ‘Pivots’ in conversation. Poster presented at theESF-Conference on Interactional Linguistics, Helsinki, 6–11th September.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2007) On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics39: 2217-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.3.07hor
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dislocation , Emergence , On-line grammar , Pivot , Progressivity , Repair and Speaker’s stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error