Volume 24, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


In this essay, I discuss one direction for developing a systematic, data-grounded analysis of categories in talk-in-interaction. This framework is developed around two main analytical foci. The first examines how the participants themselves work to publicly associate some set of normatively and morally accountable actions, rights, obligations, entitlements, attributes, etc. (i.e., category-bound predicates; see, e.g., Jayyusi 1984; Sacks 1972a, 1972b, 1979, 1992; Watson 1978) to the various turn- and sequence-generated categories built up by their actions-in-talk, and to explicit categorial formulations (i.e., labels, metonyms, descriptions, etc.) and their indexers. The second is concerned with how the participants recognizably and relevantly accomplish the sequential organization and turn by turn management of their categorization work. The notions of rhetorical (see Edwards 1991, 1997, 1998), conditional (Schegloff 1968, 1972), and retro-relevance (see Schegloff 2007a on ‘retro-sequences’), along with response priority (Bilmes 1993, 1995; see also Bilmes 1988) are introduced as sequential analytical tools for developing a systematic, data-based analysis of these practices.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Antaki, C. , and S. Widdicombe
    (1998) Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki , and S.M. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilmes, J
    (1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society17: 161-181. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012744 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1993) Ethnomethodology, culture and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics. Pragmatics3: 387-409.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1995) Negotiation and compromise. In A. Firth (ed.), The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace. Oxford: Pergamon Press Oxford, pp.61-81. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑042400‑2.50009‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042400-2.50009-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bushnell, C
    (2011) Interactionally constructing practice, community, shared resources, and identity: An ethnomethodological analysis of interactions at conversation analytic data sessions in Japan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2014) Warai no tsuikyu: Ryugakusei mukeno rakugokai niokeru warai o fukumu sogokoi nitsuite. [In the pursuit of laughter: Laughter-in-interaction at a rakugo performance for foreign students]. Tsukuba Daigaku Ryugakusei Senta Nihongo Kyoiku Ronshu29: 19-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlin, A.P
    (2010) Reading “A tutorial on membership categorization” by Emanuel Schegloff. Journal of Pragmatics42.1: 257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll, D
    (2004) Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Disfluencies or interactional achievements?In R. Gardner , and J. Wagner (eds.), Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum, pp.201-220.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Day, D
    (1998) Being ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group. In C. Antaki , and S.M. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.151-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards, D
    (1998) The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki , and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.15-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1997) Discourse and Cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1991) Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology1.4: 515-542. doi: 10.1177/0959354391014007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391014007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Francis, D. , and C. Hart
    (1997) Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial. In S. Hester , and P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America, pp.123-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gafaranga, J
    (2000) Medium repair vs. other-language repair: Telling the medium of a bilingual conversation. International Journal of Bilingualism4.3: 327-350. doi: 10.1177/13670069000040030301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069000040030301 [Google Scholar]
  15. Garfinkel, H
    (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, C
    (1980) Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry50.3-4: 272-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  17. (2007) Interactive footing. In E. Holt , and R. Clift (eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.16-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Have, P. ten
    (2007) Doing Conversation Analysis (Second Edition.). Boston: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayashi, M
    (2004) Projection and grammar: Notes on the `action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics36.8: 1337-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, J
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson , and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.299-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction45.1: 30-52. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, J. , and G. Raymond
    (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15-38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hester, S. , and P. Eglin
    (1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership categorisation analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hosoda, Y
    (2000) Other-repair in Japanese conversation between nonnative and native speakers. Issues in Applied Linguistics11.1: 39-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2006) Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics27.1: 25-50. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami022 [Google Scholar]
  26. Housley, W. , and R. Fitzgerald
    (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorisation. Qualitative Research2: 59-74. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104 [Google Scholar]
  27. Housely, W. , and R. Fitzgeral
    (2009) Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse and Society20: 345-362. doi: 10.1177/0957926509102405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509102405 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hutchby, I. , and R. Wooffitt
    (2008) Conversation Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jayyusi, L
    (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge and K. Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jefferson, G
    (1972) Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York, NY: Free Press, pp.294-333.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society3.2: 181-199. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1983) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In J.R.E. Lee , and G. Button (eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp.86-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1986) Notes on “latency” in overlap onset. Human Studies9.2/3: 153-183. doi: 10.1007/BF00148125
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1989) Notes on a possible metric which provides for a “standard maximum” silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger , and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.13-31. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamio, A
    (1997) Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kasper, G
    (2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review19: 83-99. doi: 10.1075/aila.19.07kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas [Google Scholar]
  38. Lepper, G
    (2000) Categories in Text and Talk: A Practical Introduction to Categorization Analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mori, J
    (2004) Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal88.4: 536-550. doi: 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑17‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Nguyen, H.T
    (2008) Sequence organization as local and longitudinal achievement. Text & Talk28.4: 501-528. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.025 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nguyen, H. t. , and G. Kasper
    (eds.) (2009) Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ochs, E
    (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language & Social Interaction26.3: 287. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz , and S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.407-438.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Omori, M
    (2008) Constitution of interculturality in an English conversational exchange program. Paper presented atthe 18th International Congress of Linguistics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Onuki, T. , and H. Matsuki
    (2003) Hankoukoudou no kousei to seiin kategoriika jissen: Iwayuru ‘Ashikaga jiken’ ni okeru seishin kantei wo megutte. [The practice of membership categorization in constituting criminal action: A look at the psychological evaluation in the so-called “Ashikaga” case] Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology28: 68-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Paoletti, I
    (1998) Handling ‘incoherence’ according to the speaker’s on-sight categorization. In C. Antaki , and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.171-190.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Park, J
    (2007) Co-construction of nonnative speaker identity in cross-cultural interaction. Applied Linguistics28.3: 339-360. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Psathas, G
    (1999) Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies22.2: 139-162. doi: 10.1023/A:1005422932589
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005422932589 [Google Scholar]
  49. Raymond, G. , and J. Heritage
    (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society35.5: 677-705. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  50. Richards, K
    (2006) ‘Being the teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics27.1: 51-77. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami041 [Google Scholar]
  51. Sacks, H
    (1972a) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, pp.31-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1972b) On the analysability of stories by children. In J.J. Gumperz , and D.H. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics; the Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp.325-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (1975) Everyone has to lie. In M. Sanchez , and B.G. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York: Academic Press, pp.57-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1979) Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp.7-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. (Vols. 1–2). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , and G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50.4: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schegloff, E.A
    (1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist70.6: 1075-1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  58. (1972) Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp.75-119.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp.261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”Sociological Inquiry50.3-4: 104-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  61. (1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. InTalk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp.70-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. (1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In B. Doval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. NJ: Ablex, pp.51-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. (1991) Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick , J.M. Levine , and S.D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, pp.150-171. doi: 10.1037/10096‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-007 [Google Scholar]
  64. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97.5: 1295-1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  65. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. InInteraction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.52-133. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  66. (1997) Third turn repair. In G. Guy , C. Feagin , D. Schiffrin , and J. Baugh (eds.), Towards a Social Science of Language 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.261-286. doi: 10.1075/cilt.128.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.128.05sch [Google Scholar]
  67. (2000a) Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society29.1: 1-63. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2000b) When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics21.2: 205-243. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.2.205
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205 [Google Scholar]
  69. (2006) Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. Enfield , and S. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg, pp.70-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. (2007a) Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2007b) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39.3: 462-482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2007c) Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies9: 433-461. doi: 10.1177/1461445607079162
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162 [Google Scholar]
  73. Schegloff, E.A. , and H. Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8.4: 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  74. Seedhouse, P
    (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Stokoe, E
    (2009) Doing actions with identity categories: Complaints and denials in neighbor disputes. Text & Talk29.1: 75-97. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2009.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.004 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2012) Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies14.3: 277-303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
  77. Talmy, S
    (2008) The cultural productions of the ESL student at Tradewinds High: Contingency, multidirectionality, and identity in L2 socialization. Applied Linguistics29.4: 619-644. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn011 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tanaka, H
    (1999a) Grammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-American English: The display of context, social identity and social relation. Human Studies22.2: 363-395. doi: 10.1023/A:1005475524334
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005475524334 [Google Scholar]
  79. (1999b) Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.56 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2000) The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics32.8: 1135-1176. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00087‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00087-9 [Google Scholar]
  81. Watson, R
    (1978) Categorisation, authorisation and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology12: 105-113. doi: 10.1177/003803857801200106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1994) Catégories, séquentialité et ordre social: Un nouveau regard sur l’oeuvre de Sacks. In B. Fradin , L. Quére , and J. Widmer (eds.), L’Enquête Sur Les Catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, pp.151-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. (1997) Some general reflections on ‘categorization’ and ‘sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester , and P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America, pp.49-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wong, J
    (2000) Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics21.2: 244-267. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.2.244
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.244 [Google Scholar]
  85. Zimmerman, D.H
    (1998) Identity, context and interaction. InIdentities in talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.87-106.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error