Indexing a withdrawal from one’s previously-taken position

References

1. Antaki, Charles, and Margaret Wetherell
   1999 “Show Concessions.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445699001001002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001002 [Google Scholar]
2. Arita, Yuki
   2021 “Display of Concession: Maa-Prefaced Responses to Polar Questions in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.014
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.014 [Google Scholar]
3. Chang, Li-Hsiang
   2009 “Stance Uses of the Mandarin LE Constructions in Conversational Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar]
4. Chui, Kawai
   2002 “Ritualization in Evolving Pragmatic Functions: A Case Study of duì.” Language and Linguistics (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
   2000 “Concessive Patterns in Conversation.” InCause, Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043.4.381
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.381 [Google Scholar]
6. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
   2005 “A Linguistic Practice for Retracting Overstatements: ‘Concessive Repair’.” InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. byAuli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.17.14cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.14cou [Google Scholar]
7. Curl, Traci S.
   2006 “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
8. Ge, Kaizhen
   2019 “On the Features of Stance-taking of ‘Shuo shihua’ and ‘Shuo zhende’.” Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Social Sciences) ():–.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gunthner, Susanne
   2016 “Concessive Patterns in Interaction: Uses of zwar…aber (‘true…but’)-Constructions in Everyday Spoken German.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.009 [Google Scholar]
10. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Term of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
12. Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi
    1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Home Visits and First-Time Mothers.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, –. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hsieh, Chen-Yu Chester
    2018 “From Turn-Taking to Stance-Taking: Wenti-shi ‘(the) thing is’ as a Projector Construction and an Epistemic Marker in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
14. Jefferson, Gail
    2004a “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
15. Jefferson, Gail
    2004b “A Sketch of Some Orderly Aspects of Overlap in Natural Conversation.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.05jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.05jef [Google Scholar]
16. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
17. Koivisto, Aino
    2012 “Discourse Patterns for Turn-final Conjunctions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.006 [Google Scholar]
18. Kotthoff, Helga
    1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500017103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017103 [Google Scholar]
19. Lewis, Diana M.
    2005 “Arguing in English and French Asynchronous Online Discussion.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.014 [Google Scholar]
20. Li, Xianyin
    2016 “A Study on Multiple Sayings in Spoken Chinese: From an Interactional Perspective.” Language Education and Research: –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Li, Yan
    2010 “Functional Analysis of Discourse on the Mark ‘duì’.” Journal of Jinan University: –.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lindström, Jan K., and Anne-Marie Londen
    2013 “Concession and Reassertion: On a Dialogic Discourse Pattern in Conversation.” Text & Talk (): –. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0015 [Google Scholar]
23. Lindström, Jan K., and Anne-Marie Londen
    2014 “Insertion Concessive: An Interactional Practice as a Discourse Grammatical Construction.” Constructions (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Marian, Klara S., Jenny Nilsson, Catrin Norrby, Jan Lindström, and Camilla Wide
    2023 “On the Verge of (In)directness: Managing Complaints in Service Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.013 [Google Scholar]
25. Müller, Frank E.
    1996 “Affiliating and Disaffiliating with Continuers: Prosodic Aspects of Recipiency.” InProsody in Conversation, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.006 [Google Scholar]
26. Peng, Shuiqin, and Juanman Zheng
    2022 “The Sequence Characteristics and Conventionalization of the ‘Na Daoshi’.” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sacks, Harvey
    1987 “On the Preference for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” InTalk and Social Organization, ed. byGraham Button, and John R. E. Lee, –. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-004 [Google Scholar]
29. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
30. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
31. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language: –. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
32. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
    2008 “Almost Certainly and Most Definitely: Degree Modifiers and Epistemic Stance.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.015 [Google Scholar]
33. Smith, Michael S., and Lucas M. Seuren
    2022 “Re-apprehending Misapprehensions: A Practice for Disclosing Troubles in Understanding in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.018 [Google Scholar]
34. Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction ():–. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
35. Stivers, Tanya
    2004 “‘No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2004.tb00733.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x [Google Scholar]
36. Stivers, Tanya
    2022 The Book of Answers: Alignment, Autonomy, and Affiliation in Social Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197563892.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563892.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
37. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
    2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, –. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Sun, Liping, and Qingming Fang
    2011 “Overview of Study on Types and Functions of Chinese Discourse Markers.” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tsai, Hsiu-Chun
    2001 “The Discourse Function of the duì Receipt in Mandarin Conversation.” Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin
    2020 “Agreement, Acknowledgement, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of hao and duì in Taiwan Mandarin Chinese.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445609346922
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609346922 [Google Scholar]
41. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina, and John Heritage
    2017 “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin.” InEnabling Human Conduct, ed. byGeoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.273.14wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.14wu [Google Scholar]
42. Yang, Jie
    2013 “A Multimodal Study of Response Token duì duì duì in Mandarin Conversation.” Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Yu, Guodong
    2022 “Ai (唉) as a Topic Transition Signal in Mandarin Conversations.” Journal of Foreign Languages (): –, .
    [Google Scholar]
44. Zhang, Shuling
    2021 “The Epistemics of Advice-Giving Sequences: Epistemic Primacy and Subordination in Advice Rejection.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/14614456211017394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211017394 [Google Scholar]
45. Zhou, Xiaoli
    2022 “Acknowledging Coparticipant’s Contribution to One’s Interactional Goal: The Multiple Saying duì duì duì in Mandarin Chinese Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.08.005 [Google Scholar]