1887
image of Pragmatic functions of lê ‘what’ in Longxi Qiang
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines the pragmatic functions of Longxi Qiang interrogative pronoun (‘what’) in natural conversation. Based on approximately ten hours of transcribed data, we found that is used in question and non-question functions such as filler, reversed polarity question marker, attention attractor, negative stance marker, non-specific referent, general extender, and universal term. Most instances of in the data serve various interactional functions rather than seeking information. The non-question functions of are related to negative, rather than positive, meaning; for example, negative evaluation, stance, or providing little to no information of the referents under discussion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24017.zhe
2025-08-08
2026-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biber, Douglas, Johansson Stig, Geoffrey Leech, Conrad Suan, Edward Finegan, and Hirst Graeme
    1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan, Susan E., and Maurice Williams
    1995 “The Feeling of Another’s Knowing: Prosody and FPs as Cues to Listeners about the Metacognitive States of Speakers”. Journal of Memory and Language: –. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1017
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cha, Jihyeon
    2010 “Interaction of Prosody and Discourse Function: Based on the Korean Discourse Marker mwe in the Sentence-Final Position”. Language Facts and Perspectives: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, Wallace L.
    ed. 1980The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Advances in Discourse Processes, vol. 3. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chor, Winnie, and Marvin Lam
    2023 ““It Can Do me1 (‘What’)?” — On the Development of a Cantonese Interrogative Pronoun into a Negative Stance Marker”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dekhissi, Laurie
    2016 “Qu’est-ce t’as été te mêler de ça?! Une «nouvelle» structure pour les questions rhétoriques conflictuelles”. Journal of French Language Studies (): –. 10.1017/S0959269515000253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269515000253 [Google Scholar]
  7. Egbert, Maria, and Monika Vöge
    2008 “Wh-Interrogative Formats Used for Questioning and Beyond: German warum (Why) and wieso (Why) and English Why”. Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445607085583
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085583 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer
    2018 “When “Questions” Are Not Questions. Inferences and Conventionalization in Spanish But-Prefaced Partial Interrogatives”. Open Linguistics: –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Englebretson, Robert
    2007 “Grammatical Resources for Social Purposes: Some Aspects of Stance-Taking in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation”. InStance-Taking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.05eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.05eng [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganenkov, Dmitry, Yuri Lander, and Timur A. Maisak
    2010 “From Interrogatives to Placeholder in Udi and Agul Spontaneous Narratives”. InFillers, Pauses and Placeholders, ed. byNino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis, and Margaret Maclagan, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.93.05gan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93.05gan [Google Scholar]
  11. Gipper, Sonja
    2022 “Assertive Content Questions in Yurakaré Conversations: Using Indisputable Facts to Justify Disputable Claims, Actions and Stances”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Halonen, Mia, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2008 “Using niin-Interrogative to Treat the Prior Speaker’s Action as an Exaggeration”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085584
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085584 [Google Scholar]
  13. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heinemann, Trine
    2008 “Questions of Accountability: Yes-No Interrogatives That Are Unanswerable”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085590
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085590 [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Bufan, and Facheng Zhou
    2006Qiangyu Yanjiu [Research on Qiang]. Chengdu: Sichuan Renmin Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, Chenglong
    2007Puxi Qiangyu Yanjiu [A Grammar of Puxi Qiang]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, Haiquan, Hui Cheng, Lina Qian, Yixiong Chen, and Zhou Peng
    2024 “Wh- Words: Existential or Universal Quantifiers in Child Mandarin?”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (): . 10.1007/s10936‑024‑10079‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10079-4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kazama, Sinjiro
    2007 “Rhetorical Questions with Interrogative Markers in Nanai”. InCorpus-Based Perspectives in Linguistics, ed. byYuji Kawaguchi, Toshihiro Takagaki, Nobuo Tomimori, and Yoichiro Tsuruga, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ubli.6.22kaz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ubli.6.22kaz [Google Scholar]
  19. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions Which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00057‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2003 “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lambrecht, Kund
    1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  23. LaPolla, Randy J., and Chenglong Huang
    2003A Grammar of Qiang with Annotated Texts and Glossary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197273 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, Heeju, and Sung-Ock Sohn
    2022 “From Interrogative to Disaffiliative Stance-Marker: An Analysis of mwusun ‘What’ in Korean Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Heeju, Danjie Su, and Hongyin Tao
    2017 “A Crosslinguistic Study of Some Extended Uses of What-Based Interrogative Expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean”. Chinese Language Discourse (): –. 10.1075/cld.00001.lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00001.lee [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Guangkun
    1998Mawo Qiangyu Yanjiu [Studies on the Mawo dialect of the Qiang language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Monzoni, Chiara M.
    2008 “Introducing Direct Complaints Through Questions: The Interactional Achievement of ‘Pre-Sequences’”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085591
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085591 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagaya, Naonori
    2022 “Beyond Questions: Non-Interrogative Uses of ano ‘What’ in Tagalog”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nam, Kilim, and Jihyeon Cha
    2010 “Usage Patterns and Functions of Discourse Marker mwo”. Hangul: –. 10.22557/HG.2010.06.288.91
    https://doi.org/10.22557/HG.2010.06.288.91 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ozerov, Pavel
    2019 “This Is Not an Interrogative: The Prosody of “Wh-Questions” in Hebrew, and the Sources of Their Questioning and Rhetorical Interpretations.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2018 “The Pragmatics of Spanish Postposed Wh-Interrogatives”. Folia Linguistica (): –. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2021 “Two Types of Constructionalization Processes in Spanish and Portuguese Clefted Wh-Interrogatives”. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/shll‑2021‑2042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2021-2042 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1984 “On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation”. InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byMaxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
    2008 “Introduction: Questioning and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in Interaction”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085581 [Google Scholar]
  36. Steensig, Jakob, and Tine Larsen
    2008 “Affiliative and Disaffiliative Uses of You Say X Question”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085593
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085593 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stivers, Tanya, and Nick J. Enfield
    2010 “A Coding Scheme for Question-Response Sequences in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
    2008 “‘Did You Have Permission To Smash Your Neighbour’s Door?’ Silly Questions and Their Answers in Police — Suspect Interrogations’”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607085592
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085592 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun, Hongkai
    1981Qiangyu Jianzhi [A Brief Description of the Qiang language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun, Hoingkai
    2001 “Lun Zangmian Yuzu Zhong de Qiangyuzhi Yuyan [On Language of the Qiangic Branch in Tibeto-Burman]”. Language and Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Swerts, Marc
    1998 “Fillers as Markers of Discourse Structure”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00014‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00014-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tanangkingsing, Michael
    2022 “Pragmatic Function of Versatile unsa ‘What’ in Cebuano: From Interrogative Pronoun to Placeholder to Stance Marker”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  43. Yap, Foong H., Abhishek K. Kashyap, and Hongyin Tao
    2023 “Interrogative and Speaker Stance: From Information-Seeking to Interpersonal (Dis)Affiliation”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yap, Foong H., and Huiling Xu
    2022 “Indefiniteness, Interrogativity and Speaker Stance: Insights from the Extended Uses of ‘What’ Words in Chaozhou”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.018 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zheng, Wuxi
    2019 “Polyfunction Derived from Fillers: The Case of làmò in Longxi Qiang”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.009 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24017.zhe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24017.zhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: ‘what’ ; non-question uses ; Longxi Qiang ; question
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error