oa Quotation headlines in the printed British quality press

References

1. Arendholz, Jenny, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig
   (eds.) 2015 The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561 [Google Scholar]
2. Bednarek, Monika
   2016 “Voices and Values in the News: News Media Talk, News Values and Attribution.” Discourse, Context & Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple
   2017 The Discourse of News Values: How News Organisations Create Newsworthiness. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bell, Allan
   1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blom, Jonas Nygaard, and Kenneth Reinecke Hansen
   2015 “Click Bait: Forward-Reference as Lure in Online News Headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010 [Google Scholar]
6. Bonyadi, Alireza, and Moses Samuel
   2013 “Headlines in Newspaper Editorials: A Contrastive Study.” SAGE Open (). 10.1177/2158244013494863
   https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013494863 [Google Scholar]
7. Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach
   2011 “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” InUnderstanding Quotation, ed. byElke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240085.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085.1 [Google Scholar]
8. Bublitz, Wolfram, and Uta Lenk
   1999 “Disturbed Coherence: ‘Fill Me in’.” InCoherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. byWolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.63.12bub
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.12bub [Google Scholar]
9. Bublitz, Wolfram
   2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
10. Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Ingrid van Alphen
    2012 “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives.” InQuotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. byIsabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, –, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15.02pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.02pre [Google Scholar]
11. Cappelen, Herman, and Ernie Lepore
    1997 “Varieties of Quotation.” Mind (): –. 10.1093/mind/106.423.429
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/106.423.429 [Google Scholar]
12. Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language (): –. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
13. Chovanec, Jan
    2014 Pragmatics of Tense and Time in News: From Canonical Headlines to Online News Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.253 [Google Scholar]
14. Clayman, Steven
    1995 “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1995.tb00746.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00746.x [Google Scholar]
15. Fetzer, Anita
    2015 “‘When You Came into Office You Said that Your Government Would Be Different’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” InThe Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. byAnita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin. –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259.10fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259.10fet [Google Scholar]
16. Fetzer, Anita
    2018 “‘And You Know, Jeremy, My Father Came from a Very Poor Background Indeed’: Collective Identities and the Private-Public Interface in Political Discourse.” InThe Discursive Construction of Identities in Online and Offline Contexts: Personal — Group — Collective, ed. byBirte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernandez, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.78.10fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.10fet [Google Scholar]
17. Fetzer, Anita
    2020 “‘And I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar]
18. Fetzer, Anita
    2022 “Doing Things with Discourse in the Mediated Political Arena: Participation and Pluralism of Discursive Action.” Pragmatics & Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.21025.fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21025.fet [Google Scholar]
19. Fetzer, Anita
    2024 “‘Being Sensible is Now a Radical Concept I LOVE that Quote haha’: Quotations in Political Speeches and User Comments.” Internet Pragmatics (online first). 10.1075/ip.00109.fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00109.fet [Google Scholar]
20. Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
    2019 “Quoting Ordinary People in Prime Minister’s Questions.” InThe Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. byAnita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.307.04ani
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.04ani [Google Scholar]
21. Fetzer, Anita, and Daniel Weiss
    2020 “Doing Things with Quotes: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Finkbeiner, Rita, and Anita Fetzer
    2022 “Wh-Überschriften im Deutschen und Englischen. Eine explorative kontrastive Studie zu ihrer Form und textstrukturierenden Funktion in Pressetexten.“ InWege der Germanistik in transkultureller Perspektive. Akten des XIV. Kongresses der Internationalen Vereinigung für Germanistik (IVG) (Bd. 6) — Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik — Beihefte, ed. byLaura Auteri, Natascia Barrale, and Arianna Di Bella, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gumperz, John J.
    1996 “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference.” InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Halliday, Michael
    1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed.London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ifantidou, Elly
    2009 “Newspaper Headlines and Relevance: Ad Hoc Concepts in Ad Hoc Contexts.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016 [Google Scholar]
28. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009 “Entextualization, Mediatization and Authentication: Orthographic Choice in Media Transcripts.” Text & Talk (): –. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.030 [Google Scholar]
29. Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
    2020 “Creation, Dissemination and Uptake of Fake-Quotes in Lay Political Discourse on Facebook and Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009 [Google Scholar]
30. Landert, Daniela
    2014 Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.240
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.240 [Google Scholar]
31. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
    2019 The Praxis of Indirect Reports Cognitive, Sociopragmatic, and Philosophical Issues. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑14269‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14269-8 [Google Scholar]
33. Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz
    2009 “Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk: –. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.026 [Google Scholar]
34. Reber, Elisabeth
    2021 Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108869898
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869898 [Google Scholar]
35. Saka, Paul
    2013 “Quotation.” Philosophy Compass (): –. 10.1111/phc3.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12069 [Google Scholar]
36. Sbisà, Marina
    2013 “Some Remarks about Speech Act Pluralism.” InPerspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. byAlessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01011‑3_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_10 [Google Scholar]
37. Sbisà, Marina
    2002a “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” InRethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. byAnita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi [Google Scholar]
38. Sbisà, Marina
    2002b “Speech Acts in Context.” Language and Communication (): –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(02)00018‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6 [Google Scholar]
39. Sbisà, Marina
    2023 Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192844125.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844125.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
40. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
41. Searle, John R.
    1983 Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452 [Google Scholar]
42. Semino, Elena, and Michael Short
    2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
43. Short, Michael
    1991 “Speech Presentation, the Novel and the Press.” InThe Taming of the Text. Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture, ed. byWillie van Peer, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sperber, Dan, and Deidre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tannen, Deborah
    2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
46. Weiss, Daniel
    2020 “Analogical Reasoning with Quotations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.008 [Google Scholar]
47. Wilson, Deidre
    2012 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” InMeaning and Relevance, ed. byDeidre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014 [Google Scholar]