1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Unprompted self-disclosure in first encounter interactions
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Research on self-disclosure is well-established in psychology and communication studies; however, unprompted self-disclosure as an action in conversation has not received as much attention. First encounters are often marked by social uncertainty, and self-disclosure plays a crucial role in facilitating conversation. Using a qualitative approach informed by insights from pragmatics and Conversation Analysis, and complemented by an analysis of frequencies of acts performed in conversation, this study analyzed video conference recordings of twenty-two dyads of unacquainted international postgraduate students in Malaysian universities. This paper describes how interlocutors use unprompted self-disclosure as interactional strategy in first encounters, focusing on the patterns of self-disclosure that emerge and the functions they serve. The findings extend understanding of how interactants navigate epistemic territories to achieve interactional goals in initial conversations, where knowledge about one another is limited.

© International Pragmatics Association
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
2025-12-16
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altman, Irwin, and Dalmas A. Taylor
    1973 Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman, Irwin
    1975 Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, John Langshaw
    1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, Charles R., and Kathy Kellermann
    1994 “Acquiring Social Information.” InStrategic Interpersonal Communication, edited byJohn A. Daly, and John M. Wiemann, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203056851
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203056851 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blau, Peter
    1964 Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bristol, Rachel, and Federico Rossano
    2020 “Epistemic Trespassing and Disagreement.” Journal of Memory and Language: . 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104067
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104067 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Brennan
    1991 “Grounding in Communication.” InPerspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, edited byLauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, –. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Herbert H., and Catherine R. Marshall
    1981 “Definiteness and the Reference of the Pronoun ‘It.’” InFormal Semantics of Natural Language, edited byEdward L. Keenan, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  11. Daley, Andrea E.
    2012 “Becoming Seen, Becoming Known: Lesbian Women’s Self-Disclosures of Sexual Orientation to Mental Health Service Providers.” Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health (): –. 10.1080/19359705.2012.680547
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2012.680547 [Google Scholar]
  12. Flint, Natasha, Michael Haugh, and Andrew J. Merrison
    2019 “Modulating Troubles Affiliation in Initial Interactions: The Role of Remedial Accounts.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.17010.fli
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17010.fli [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia, Angela Cora
    2017 “What Went Right: Interactional Strategies for Managing Crisis Negotiations During an Emergency Service Call.” Sociological Quarterly (): –. 10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 [Google Scholar]
  14. Greene, Kathryn, Valerian J. Derlega, and Amanda Mathews
    2006 “Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited byAnita L. Vangelisti, and Daniel Perlman, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511606632.023
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606632.023 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldsmith, Daena J.
    2001 “A Normative Approach to the Study of Uncertainty and Communication.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2001.tb02894.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02894.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
    2015 “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions Amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/multi‑2014‑0104
     https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0104 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  20. Homans, George C.
    1958 “Social Behavior as Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/222355
     https://doi.org/10.1086/222355 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jourard, Sidney M.
    1971 Self-Disclosure: An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. New York: Wiley-Interscience. 10.1037/h0043357
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043357 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jourard, Sidney M., and Paul Lasakow
    1958 “Some Factors in Self-Disclosure.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology: –. 10.1037/h0043357
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043357 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamio, Akio
    1994 “The Theory of Territory of Information: The Case of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90047‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90047-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995 “Territory of Information in English and Japanese and Psychological Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00064‑L
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00064-L [Google Scholar]
  25. Laver, John
    1981 “Linguistic Routines and Politeness in Greeting and Parting.” InConversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, edited byFlorian Coulmas, –. Mouton. 10.1515/9783110809145.289
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809145.289 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lerner, Gene H.
    1996 “On the ‘Semi-Permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics: –. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Logren, Antti, Johanna Ruusuvuori, and Johanna Laitinen
    2019 “Peer Responses to Self-Disclosures in Group Counseling.” Text and Talk (): –. 10.1515/text‑2019‑2042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2042 [Google Scholar]
  28. Maynard, Douglas W., and Don H. Zimmerman
    1984 “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly (): –. 10.2307/3033633
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3033633 [Google Scholar]
  29. Niemi, Johanna, and Ellen B. Pullins
    2020 “Tell Me More: How Salespeople Encourage Customer Disclosure.” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing (): –. 10.1108/JBIM‑11‑2019‑0482
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2019-0482 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2017 “Preference Organization.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, edited byJon F. Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.132
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.132 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018 “Arriving: Expanding the Personal State Sequence.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1485225
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485225 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language (): –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Savander, Elina È., Juha Hintikka, Miikka Wuolio, and Anssi Peräkylä
    2021 “The Patients’ Practices Disclosing Subjective Experiences in the Psychiatric Intake Interview.” Frontiers in Psychiatry (): –. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.605760
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.605760 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Vol.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica (): –. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  36. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinkeviciute, Valeria, and Adriana Rodriguez
    2021 “So… Introductions: Conversational Openings in Getting Acquainted Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.024
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.024 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sprecher, Susan, Allison Wenzel, and John Harvey
    2018 “Self-Disclosure and Starting a Close Relationship.” InHandbook of Relationship Initiation, –. New York: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780429020513‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020513-16 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2009 ““I’ve Got a Girlfriend”: Police Officers Doing ‘Self-Disclosure’ in Their Interrogations of Suspects.” Narrative Inquiry (): –. 10.1075/ni.19.1.09sto
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.1.09sto [Google Scholar]
  40. Stommel, Wyke, and Frans J. Meijman
    2011 “The Use of Conversation Analysis to Study Social Accessibility of an Online Support Group on Eating Disorders.” Global Health Promotion (): –. 10.1177/1757975911404764
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975911404764 [Google Scholar]
  41. Strambi, Antonella, and Vincenza Tudini
    2020 “I’ll Say Something About Myself: Questions and Self-Disclosures in Italian L1-L2 Online Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  42. Svennevig, Jan
    2014 “Direct and Indirect Self-Presentation in First Conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X13512307
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13512307 [Google Scholar]
  43. Walkinshaw, Ian, Neil Mitchell, and Siti Subhan
    2019 “Self-Denigration as a Relational Strategy in Lingua Franca Talk: Asian English Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
Loading
Unprompted self-disclosure in first encounter interactions
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24031.lai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: first encounters ; epistemic stance ; epistemic status ; interactional strategies ; self-disclosure ; epistemic territory ; unprompted self-disclosure

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error