1887
image of Can denial strategies rebuild trust?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores whether denial strategies can rebuild public trust, using evidence from a hospital’s statement regarding cancer incidents in its laboratory. A discourse analysis of the hospital’s statement reveals that explicit and implicit denial strategies are used to rebuild public trust. Specifically, the hospital uses explicit denial to refute the identity or severity of the affected individuals. Besides, the hospital uses implicit denial to construct a trustworthy image of ability, transparency, and benevolence, thereby addressing public concerns. Further experimental studies indicate that neither explicit nor implicit denial alone is sufficient to rebuild trust. Instead, a combination of both strategies is essential for effectively rebuilding trust. Based on these findings, this paper offers suggestions for rebuilding public trust.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24041.yan
2026-03-23
2026-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benoit, William
    2015Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blöbaum, Bernd
    2016Trust and Communication in a Digitized World: Models and Concepts of Trust Research. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑28059‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen, and Maarten van Leeuwen
    2021 “‘Those Are Your Words, Not Mine!’ Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment”. Argumentation (): –. 10.1007/s10503‑020‑09521‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09521-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Candlin, Christopher, and Jonathan Crichton
    2013Discourses of Trust. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑29556‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29556-9 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Xinren
    2021Exploring Identity Work in Chinese Communication. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheryan, Sapna, and Benoît Monin
    2005 “Where Are You Really from? Asian Americans and Identity Denial”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): . 10.1037/0022‑3514.89.5.717
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.717 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, Stanley
    2013States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Hoboken: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coombs, W. Timothy
    1999 “Information and Compassion in Crisis Responses: A Test of Their Effects”. Journal of Public Relations Research (): –. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1102_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1102_02 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, Wayne A.
    2011 “‘Metalinguistic’ Negations, Denial, and Idioms”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fannes, Gijs, and An-Sofie Claeys
    2023 “Shaping Attributions of Crisis Responsibility in the Case of an Accusation: The Role of Active and Passive Voice in Crisis Response Strategies”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X221108120
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221108120 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferrin, Donald L., Peter H. Kim, Cecily D. Cooper, and Kurt T. Dirks
    2007 “Silence Speaks Volumes: The Effectiveness of Reticence in Comparison to Apology and Denial for Responding to Integrity- and Competence-Based Trust Violations”. Journal of Applied Psychology (): . 10.1037/0021‑9010.92.4.893
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.893 [Google Scholar]
  12. Flores, Fernando, and Robert C. Solomon
    1998 “Creating Trust”. Business Ethics Quarterly (): –. 10.2307/3857326
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3857326 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuoli, Matteo, and Carita Paradis
    2014 “A Model of Trust-Repair Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuoli, Matteo, and Christopher Hart
    2018 “Trust-Building Strategies in Corporate Discourse: An Experimental Study”. Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926518770264
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770264 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hewett, David, Bernadette M. Watson, and Cindy Gallois
    2013 “Trust, Distrust, and Communication Accommodation Among Hospital Doctors”. InDiscourse of Trust, ed. byChristopher Candlin, and Jonathan Crichton, –. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑29556‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29556-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ho, Victor
    2017 “Giving Offense and Making Amends: How Hotel Management Attempts to Manage Rapport with Dissatisfied Customers”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019 “Hotel Management’s Attempts at Repairing Customers’ Trust: The Use of Apology and Denial”. Pragmatics and Society (): –. 10.1075/ps.18008.ho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18008.ho [Google Scholar]
  18. 2021 “Denial in Managerial Responses: Forms, Targets and Discourse Environment”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.030 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ibrahim, Mohammed, and Pieter M. Ribbers
    2009 “The Impacts of Competence-Trust and Openness-Trust on Interorganizational Systems”. European Journal of Information Systems (): –. 10.1057/ejis.2009.17
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.17 [Google Scholar]
  20. Iqbal, Yeshim, and Rezarta Bilali
    2018 “The Impact of Acknowledgement and Denial of Responsibility for Harm on Victim Groups’ Perceptions of Justice, Power, and Intergroup Attitudes”. European Journal of Social Psychology (): –. 10.1002/ejsp.2338
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2338 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, Peter H., Donald L. Ferrin, Cecily D. Cooper, and Kurt T. Dirks
    2004 “Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence-Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations”. Journal of Applied Psychology (): . 10.1037/0021‑9010.89.1.104
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewicki, Roy J., Beth Polin, and Robert B. Lount Jr.
    2016 “An Exploration of the Structure of Effective Apologies”. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research (): –. 10.1111/ncmr.12073
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12073 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewicki, Roy J., and Chad Brinsfield
    2017 “Trust Repair”. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior: –. 10.1146/annurev‑orgpsych‑032516‑113147
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin, Yuting
    2021 “Legitimation Strategies in Corporate Discourse: A Comparison of UK and Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Reports”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin, James, and Peter R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mayer, C. Roger, James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman
    1995 “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”. Academy of Management Review (): –. 10.2307/258792
    https://doi.org/10.2307/258792 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck, and Hugo Mercier
    2018 “Saying, Presupposing and Implicating: How Pragmatics Modulates Commitment”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. McCready, Eric S.
    2015Reliability in Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mullan, Hugh
    1955 “Status Denial in Group Psychoanalysis”. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (): –. 10.1097/00005053‑195510000‑00005
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-195510000-00005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rousseau, Denise, Sim Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer
    1998 “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust”. Academy of Management Review (): –. 10.5465/amr.1998.926617
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 [Google Scholar]
  31. Souter, James
    2011 “A Culture of Disbelief or Denial? Critiquing Refugee Status Determination in the United Kingdom”. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Spenader, Jennifer, and Emar Maier
    2009 “Contrast as Denial in Multi-Dimensional Semantics”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stapleton, Karyn, and Owen Hargie
    2011 “Double-Bind Accountability Dilemmas: Impression Management and Accountability Strategies Used by Senior Banking Executives”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X11407165
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11407165 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tedlow, Richard S.
    2010Denial: Why Business Leaders Fail to Look Facts in the Face — And What to Do About It. London: Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Utz, Sonja, Uwe Matzat, and Chris Snijders
    2009 “On-line Reputation Systems: The Effects of Feedback Comments and Reactions on Building and Rebuilding Trust in On-line Auctions”. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (): –. 10.2753/JEC1086‑4415130304
    https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130304 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, Xueyu, and Rujie Cao
    2023 “Thanks for Trusting Me, Parent: Chinese Pediatricians’ Epistemic Behaviour for Trustworthiness in Online Medical Consultations”. East Asian Pragmatics (): –. 10.1558/eap.22552
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.22552 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wodak, Ruth
    2021 “Crisis Communication and Crisis Management During COVID-19”. Global Discourse (): –. 10.1332/204378921X16100431230102
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16100431230102 [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang, Kun
    2021 “Disclaimer as a Metapragmatic Device in Chinese: A Corpus-Based Study”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2023 “How sajiao (Playing Cute) Wins Forgiveness: The Effectiveness of Emojis in Rebuilding Trust Through Apology”. Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/17504813221123850
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221123850 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2024aBibliometric Research on Chinese Pragmatics. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2024b “How to Rebuild Trust Through Apology: Evidence from Public Apology Letters”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, Xin, and Yansheng Mao
    2023 “If I Testify About Others, My Testimony Is Valid: A Study of Other-Justified Discourses in Chinese Online Medical Crowdfunding”. Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.21067.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21067.zha [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24041.yan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24041.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: discourse ; digital context ; denial ; trustworthiness ; speech act
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error