1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of ¿Cómo va a ser posible?
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

We analyze the use and distribution of Spanish synthetic and periphrastic future-inflected -interrogatives in a corpus of informal Spanish conversations, within Linell’s (2009) Dialogical Theory of Language. Our corpus analysis reveals that future-inflected interrogatives realize three types of discourse functions: information requests, interactional challenges, and requests for inference, each clearly distinguishable in terms of their distribution at the sentence and discourse level. The results highlight the importance of speaker attitude and, particularly, their expectations regarding the answerability of the request. Use of the synthetic future is common in requests to inference, in which the hearer is not expected to be able to answer the question, whereas use of the periphrastic future is prototypical in requests for information and interactional challenges, indicating a grammaticalization path towards modal meanings. Our findings underscore the value of corpus-based pragmatic analysis for understanding how grammatical choices reflect interactional meaning-making.

© International Pragmatics Association
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
2026-08-25
2026-09-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/prag.24042.ros/prag.24042.ros.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aaron, Jessi Elana
    2010 “Pushing the Envelope: Looking beyond the Variable Context.” Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394509990226
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990226 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2014 “A Certain Future: Epistemicity, Prediction, and Assertion in Iberian Spanish Future Expression.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/shll‑2014‑1166
     https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2014-1166 [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer, Peter
    2016 “‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik (): –. 10.1515/zgl‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blas Arroyo, José Luis
    2008 “The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The Present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region.” Language Variation and Change (): –. 10.1017/S095439450800001X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450800001X [Google Scholar]
  5. Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
    2018 “Questions and Epistemic Stance: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Ampersand: –. 10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins
    1991 “Back to the Future.” InApproaches to Grammaticalization, ed. byElizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb [Google Scholar]
  7. Caponigro, Ivano, and Jon Sprouse
    2007 “Rhetorical Questions as Questions.” InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, ed. byLouise McNally, and Estela Puig-Waldmüller, –. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerović, Marijana
    2016 “When Suspects Ask Questions: Rhetorical Questions as a Challenging Device.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  10. Clift, Rebecca
    1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404599004029
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599004029 [Google Scholar]
  11. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
    2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139507318
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cresti, Emanuela, and Massimo Moneglia
    2005 C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew, Paul
    2012 “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646688
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646688 [Google Scholar]
  15. Egg, Markus
    2007 “Meaning and Use of Rhetorical Questions.” InProceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium, vol. 1, –. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer
    2018 “When ‘Questions’ Are Not Questions. Inferences and Conventionalization in Spanish But-Prefaced Partial Interrogatives.” Open Linguistics: –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Enfield, Nicholas J., Penelope Brown, and Jan De Ruiter
    2012 “Epistemic Dimensions of Polar Questions: Sentence-Final Particles in Comparative Perspective.” InQuestions, ed. byJan De Ruiter, –. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.014 [Google Scholar]
  18. Enghels, Renata
    2018 “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes: A Study in Recent Language Change.” Revue roumaine de linguistique [Romanian review of linguistics] : –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
    2010 “Futuro y evidencialidad.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 “Evidential Futures: The Case of Spanish.” InFuture Tense vs. Future Time: An Introduction, ed. byPhilippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine, and Saghie Sharifzadeh, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679157.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679157.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2018 “Evidential Commitment and Feature Mismatch in Spanish estar Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti
    2021 “Spanish ‘Mirative Future’.” InExpressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks, ed. byAndreas Trotzke, and Xavier Villalba, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198871217.003.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871217.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  23. Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque
    2018 “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” Language and Cognition: –. 10.1017/langcog.2017.21
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2017.21 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1996 “The Pragmatics of Constructions.” InSocial Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. byDan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Guo Jiansheng. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1982 The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Garassino, Davide
    2022 “A Contrastive Perspective on French and Italian Wh-in situ Questions. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach.” Functions of Language: –. 10.1075/fol.00037.gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00037.gar [Google Scholar]
  27. Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
    2008 “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives.” InSelected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. byJoyce Bruhn de Garavito, and Elena Valenzuela, –. Somerville: Cascadilla.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugh, Michael
    2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hayano, Kaoru
    2013 “Question Design in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, –. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch19
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2009 “Questioning in Medicine.” InWhy Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. byAlice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
    2023 “Inferential Interrogatives with qué in Spanish.” Languages (): . 10.3390/languages8040282
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040282 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Esperanza Eguía Padilla
    2017 Proyecto COLA. Corpus Oral de Lenguaje Adolescente. www.colam.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Koshik, Irene
    2003 “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies: –. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kotthoff, Helga
    2009 “Joint Construction of Humorous Fictions in Conversation. An Unnamed Narrative Activity in a Playful Keying.” Journal of Literary Theory (): –. 10.1515/JLT.2009.012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ledgeway, Adam, and Martin Maiden
    2016 The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Linell, Per
    2009a “Constructions in Dialogue.” InContexts and Constructions, ed. byAlexander Bergs, and Gabriele Diewald, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.9.05lin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.05lin [Google Scholar]
  39. 2009b Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. 10.1108/978‑1‑60752‑198‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-198-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Marcos Marín, Francisco
    2017 Corpus oral de referencia de la lengua española contemporánea. Available online atwww.lllf.uam.es/ESP/Info%20Corlec.html. Last access20/01/2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Marín Arrese, Juana
    2017 “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres: Evidence from Cross-Linguistic Case Studies.” InEvidentiality Revisited. Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. byJuana Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler, and Marta Carretero, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.271.09mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.09mar [Google Scholar]
  42. Matos Amaral, Patrícia, and Scott A. Schwenter
    2003 “Contrast and the (Non-)Occurrence of Subject Pronouns.” InSelected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. byDavid Eddington, –. Somerville: Cascadilla.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Matte Bon, Francisco, and Ma del Pilar Hernández Mercedes
    2007 “Las maneras de hablar del futuro en español: Del sistema codificado a las interpretaciones contextuales.” MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mithun, Marianne
    2016 “How Fascinating! Insubordinate Exclamations.” InInsubordination, ed. byNicholas Evans, and Honoré Watanabe, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.115.14mit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.14mit [Google Scholar]
  45. Montes, Rosa Graciela
    1999 “The Development of Discourse Markers in Spanish: Interjections.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00106‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00106-4 [Google Scholar]
  46. Myers, Lindsy Lee
    2007 “WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Their Form and Function.” PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  48. Olbertz, Hella
    1998 Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110820881
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820881 [Google Scholar]
  49. Orozco, Rafael
    2005 “Distribution of Future Time Forms in Northern Colombian Spanish.” InSelected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. byDavid Eddington, –. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Palmer, Frank Robert
    2001 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
    2012 “Preference.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, –. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  53. Primerano, Antoine, and Miriam Bouzouita
    2024 “La gramaticalización de los futuros y condicionales en el navarroaragonés de los siglos XIII y XIV : Una comparación con el castellano medieval.” InRevue Romane: –. 10.1075/rro.21015.pri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.21015.pri [Google Scholar]
  54. RAE/ASALE
    RAE/ASALE 2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Reig Alamilio, Asela
    2019 “Las interrogativas hipotéticas con qué invariable en español: Un tipo de interrogativas parciales marcadas.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/shll‑2019‑2004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2019-2004 [Google Scholar]
  56. Reinhardt, Janina
    2019 “Regularity and Variation in French Direct Interrogatives: The Morphosyntax and Intonation of Question Forms in Reality TV Shows, Audio Books and Teaching Materials.” PhD thesis. University of Konstanz. nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-y00meiao8m342
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rivero, María Luisa
    2014 “Spanish Inferential and Mirative Futures and Conditionals: An Evidential Gradable Modal Proposal.” Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics (): –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
    2019 El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b15234
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b15234 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2018 “The Pragmatics of Spanish Postposed-Wh-Interrogatives.” Folia Linguistica (): –. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2019 “Brazilian Portuguese in-situ Wh-Interrogatives between Rhetoric and Change.” Glossa(): –. 10.5334/gjgl.900
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.900 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosemeyer, Malte, and María Sol Sansiñena
    2022 “How Sentence Type Influences the Interpretation of Spanish Future Constructions.” Functions of Language (): –. 10.1075/fol.00040.ros
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00040.ros [Google Scholar]
  62. Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    eds. 2001 Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10 [Google Scholar]
  63. Squartini, Mario
    2001 “The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language (): –. 10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ [Google Scholar]
  64. 2004 “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua (): –. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00064‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00064-0 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stalnaker, Robert
    1973 “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic: –. 10.1007/BF00262951
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262951 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2002 “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy: –. 10.1023/A:1020867916902
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351810903471258
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
  68. Waltereit, Richard
    2018 “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question.” Open Linguistics: –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0004 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
Loading
¿Cómo va a ser posible?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24042.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: periphrasis ; question ; modality ; interrogative ; future ; Spanish

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error