“Tía, me dolió, ¿sabes?”

References

1. Acuña, Virginia
   2009 Género y discurso. Las mujeres y los hombres en la interacción conversacional. Munich: Lincom.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acuña, Virginia
   2011 La realización de quejas en la conversación femenina y masculina. Munich: Lincom.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Acuña, Virginia
   2017a “La realización de feminidad entre jóvenes veinteañeras: el papel de las confidencias sobre las relaciones con los hombres en la conversación juvenil femenina”. Estudios Filológicos: –. 10.4067/S0071‑17132017000100001
   https://doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17132017000100001 [Google Scholar]
4. Acuña, Virginia
   2017b “Conversación juvenil e identidad de género: despliegues de feminidad heterosexual en grupos de jóvenes veinteañeras”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/CLAC.55312
   https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.55312 [Google Scholar]
5. Acuña, Virginia
   2021a “Staging mental discursive processes and reactions: The construction of direct reported thought (DRT) in conversational storytelling”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404520000020
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000020 [Google Scholar]
6. Acuña, Virginia
   2021b “Gender and Expletives as Discourse Markers: Some Uses of joder in Young Women’s Interactions in Spanish and Galician”. InWomen, Sexual Identity and Language, Monographic dossier of Feminismo/s 38, ed. byIsabel Balteiro, –. 10.14198/fem.2021.38.03
   https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2021.38.03 [Google Scholar]
7. Albelda, Marta, and María Estellés
   eds. n.d.Corpus Ameresco, Universitat de València, www.corpusameresco.com
   [Google Scholar]
8. Alvarez Cáccamo, Celso
   1990 “The Institutionalization of Galician: Linguistic Practices, Power, and Ideology in Public Discourse.” Ph.D. thesis. University of California at Berkeley.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Briz, Antonio
   1998 El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Briz, Antonio
    2022 “El marcador discursivo tío/a en la conversación coloquial española: tipo de unidad discursiva, posición y función”. Oralia (): –. 10.25115/oralia.v25i2.8311
    https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v25i2.8311 [Google Scholar]
11. Briz, Antonio, and Grupo Val.Es.Co.
    2002 Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco-Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bublitz, Wolfram
    1988 Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.32 [Google Scholar]
13. Coates, Jennifer
    1996 Women Talk. Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Choi, Hong-Joo
    2013 “Los términos de parentesco como marcador conversacional en el lenguaje juvenil de Buenos Aires, Madrid y Santiago de Chile”. Journal of the Institute of Iberoamerican Studies, January-December: –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Latte, Fine, and Renata Enghels
    2021 “La variación lingüística del vocativo en el lenguaje juvenil madrileño”. Revue Romane (): –. 10.1075/rro.18011.del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.18011.del [Google Scholar]
16. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics: –. 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
17. Droste, Pepe, and Susanne Günthner
    2021 “Enacting ‘Being with You’. Vocative Uses of du (‘you’)”. Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.19030.dro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19030.dro [Google Scholar]
18. Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
    2002 “Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments”. InThe Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. byCecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
19. Grupo Va.Es.Co
    Grupo Va.Es.Co 2014 “Las unidades del discurso oral: la propuesta Val.Es.Co. de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial)”. Estudios de lingüística del español: –. https://raco.cat/index.php/Elies/article/view/285724
    [Google Scholar]
20. Günthner, Susanne
    1997 “Complaint Stories. Constructing Emotional Reciprocity among Women”. InCommunicating Gender in Context, ed. byHelga Kotthoff, and Ruth Wodak, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.42.10gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.42.10gun [Google Scholar]
21. Haakana, Markku
    2007 “Reported Thought in Complaint Stories”. InReporting Talk. Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. byElizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Holt, Elizabeth
    1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
23. Holt, Elizabeth
    2000 “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech”. Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04 [Google Scholar]
24. Hymes, Dell
    1986 [1972] “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life”. InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, –. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jefferson, Gail
    1981 “The Abominable “ne?”: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-response Pursuit of Response”. Occasional Paper No. 6. University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jørgensen, Annette Myre
    2007 “COLA: Un Corpus Oral de Lenguaje Adolescente”. InDiscurso y oralidad. Homenaje al profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar, ed. byLuis Cortés, –. Madrid: Arco-Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jørgensen, Annette Myre
    2008 “Tío y tía como marcadores en el lenguaje de Madrid”. InActas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional e la Sociedad Español de Lingüística (SEL), ed. byInés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde, and Ramón González Ruiz, –. Pamplona: University of Navarra.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jørgensen, Annette Myre
    2011 “Formas de tratamiento: los vocativos en el lenguaje juvenil de Madrid, Buenos Aires y Santiago de Chile”. InAs formas de tratamento em português e em espanhol. Variação, mudança e funções conversacionais, ed. byLeticia Rebollo, and Célia Regina dos Santos, –. Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2004 “¿Es universal la cortesía?”. InPragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, ed. byDiana Bravo, and Antonio Briz, –. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis”. InEssays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. byJune Helm, –. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Leech, Geoffrey
    1999 “The Distribution and Functions of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation”. InOut of Corpora, ed. byHilde Hasselgård, and Signe Oksefjell, –. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653689_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653689_013 [Google Scholar]
33. Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leenan Sorjonen
    2012 “Affiliation in Conversation”. InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, –. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch17 [Google Scholar]
34. Llopis, Ana, and Salvador Pons
    2020 “La gramaticalización de macho y tío/a como ciclo semántico-pragmático”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/clac.68970
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.68970 [Google Scholar]
35. Murillo, Danny
    2020 “Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales Ameresco-Tegucigalpa: estado, problemas, soluciones y líneas de trabajo abiertas”. Estudios Interlingüísticos: –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi Schieffelin
    1989 “Language Has a Heart”. Text: –.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984a “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984b “Pursuing a Response”. InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pons, Salvador
    dir. n.d.Corpus Val.Es.Co 3.0. www.valesco.es
    [Google Scholar]
40. Portolés, José
    1998 Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rodríguez, Andrea
    2022 “Ay No I Do Feel Exhausted: Affiliative Practices and Interpersonal Relationships in Indirect Complaints in Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.008 [Google Scholar]
42. Rodríguez Yáñez, Xoán Paulo, and Håkan Casares Berg
    2003 “The Corpus of Galicia/Spanish Bilingual Speech of the University of Vigo: Codes Tagging and Automatic Annotation”. Estudios de Sociolingüística (): –. 10.1558/sols.v4i1.358
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v4i1.358 [Google Scholar]
43. Rodríguez Yáñez, Xoán Paulo
    2007 “Paradigmes pour l’étude sociolinguistique du bilinguisme”. InLangues proches — Langues collatérales. Near Languages — Collateral Languages, ed. byJean-Michel Eloy, and Tadgh Ó Hifearnáin, –. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sanmartín Sáez, Julia
    2006 Diccionario de argot. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Selting, Margret
    2010 “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories”. Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stenström, Anna Brita
    2008 “Algunos rasgos característicos del ‘habla de contacto’ en el lenguaje de adolescentes en Madrid”. Oralia: –. 10.25115/oralia.v11i.8237
    https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v11i.8237 [Google Scholar]
47. Stenström, Anna Brita
    2014 Teenage Talk. From General Characteristics to the Use of Pragmatic Markers in a Contrastive Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stenström, Anna Brita, and Annette Myre Jørgensen
    2008 “La función fática de los apelativos en la conversación juvenil de Madrid y Londres”. InActas del III Congreso EDICE. Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral, –. Valencia: University of Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (): –. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
50. Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response”. Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
51. Tannen, Deborah
    1989 Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Tusón, Amparo
    1997 El análisis de la conversación. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Vázquez Carranza, Ariel
    2018 “Características interaccionales de algunos marcadores secuenciales del español: un estudio conversacional de partículas lingüísticas”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/CLAC.62508
    https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.62508 [Google Scholar]
54. Vila, Mª Rosa
    1987 “La segunda persona gramatical en función no deíctica”. REL: –.
    [Google Scholar]