Infinitives, discourse viewpoint, and referential interpretation of the initiator in Spanish digital news discourse

References

1. Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
   2019 Constructing Us: The First and Second Persons in Spanish Media Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110643442
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110643442 [Google Scholar]
2. Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
   2020 “Talking about ‘Others’: Referential Readings and Pragmatic Functions of Non-phoric Plural Third Persons in Spanish Media Discourse”. Lingua: –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102906
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102906 [Google Scholar]
3. Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
   2023 “La interpretación referencial del iniciador en las construcciones desfocalizadoras con se: análisis del discurso de la prensa digital”. Lengua y Habla: –.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
   2024 “Defocusing Constructions, Viewpoint, and Reference. The Shaping of Public Institutions vs. Citizens in Digital Opinion Pieces”. InForm and Meaning. Studies of Grammatical Variation and Communicative Choice in Spanish, ed. byMaría José Serrano, and Miguel A. Aijón Oliva, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Álvarez de Miranda, Pedro
   2012 “Hablar como indios”. Centro Virtual Cervantes: Rinconete. https://cvc.cervantes.es/el_rinconete/anteriores/noviembre_12/20112012_01.htm (accessedNovember 19, 2024).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blevins, James P.
   2003 “Passives and Impersonals”. Journal of Linguistics: –. 10.1017/S0022226703002081
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226703002081 [Google Scholar]
7. Cameron, Richard
   1993 “Ambiguous Agreement, Functional Compensation and Nonspecific Tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain”. Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394500001526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001526 [Google Scholar]
8. Duszak, Anna
   2002 “Us and Others: An Introduction”. InUs and Others. Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.01dus
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.01dus [Google Scholar]
9. Evans, Nicholas
   2007 “Insubordination and its Uses”. InFiniteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. byIrina Nikolaeva, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
10. Fábregas, Antonio
    2014 “El argumento espacio-temporal de ciertos verbos meteorológicos”. Ianua: –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fábregas, Antonio
    2021 “Se in Spanish: Properties, Structures, Analyses”. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics (): –. 10.7557/1.10.2.5934
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.10.2.5934 [Google Scholar]
12. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1997 Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
13. Fauconnier, Gilles
    2014 “Mental Spaces, Language Modalities, and Conceptual Integration”. InThe New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. byMichael Tomasello, vol., –. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fernández, Susana S.
    2007 La voz pasiva en español: Un análisis discursivo. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fontaine, Lisa, Katy Jones, and David Schönthal
    2023 Referring in Language: An Integrated Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316534625
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534625 [Google Scholar]
16. Hernanz, María Lluïsa
    2016 “El infinitivo”. InEnciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, ed. byJavier Gutiérrez Rexach, vol., –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315713441‑59
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-59 [Google Scholar]
17. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993 The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
18. Kittilä, Seppo
    2002 “Remarks on the Basic Transitive Sentence”. Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00043‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00043-7 [Google Scholar]
19. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2000 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Meulleman, Machteld, and Eugeen Roegiest
    2012 “Los locativos en la valencia de la construcción existencial española: ¿Actante o circunstante?”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie (): –. 10.1515/zrp‑2012‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
22. O’Rourke, Michael
    2019 “Referential Intentions”. InThe Oxford Handbook of Reference, ed. byJeanette Gundel, and Barbara Abbott, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Oakley, Todd
    2009 “Mental Spaces”. InGrammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, ed. byFrank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.5.10oak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.5.10oak [Google Scholar]
24. Ortega-Santos, Iván
    2013 “Corrective Focus at the Right Edge in Spanish”. Lingua: –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.007 [Google Scholar]
25. Palmerini, Monica
    2018 “Los infinitivos independientes en el discurso: Hacia una tipología pragmática”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación: –. 10.5209/CLAC.60522
    https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.60522 [Google Scholar]
26. Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
    2014 “Constructing Collectivity with ‘We’”. In‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. byTheodossia-Soula Pavlidou, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.239.03pav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.03pav [Google Scholar]
27. Pérez Vázquez, Enriqueta, and Félix San Vicente
    2006 “Formas verbales nominales para la comunicación no conflictiva”. InEscritura y conflicto / Scrittura e conflitto. Actas del XXI Congreso Aispi, ed. byLorenzo Blini, and Maria Vittoria Calvi, –. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Posio, Pekka
    2015 “Alcance referencial y variabilidad de las construcciones impersonales con referencia humana en español peninsular hablado. Se y la tercera persona del plural”. Spanish in Context: –. 10.1075/sic.12.3.03pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.12.3.03pos [Google Scholar]
29. RAE 2009 = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
    RAE 2009 = Real Academia Española, and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española 2009 Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sánchez López, Cristina
    2002 “Las construcciones con se: Estado de la cuestión”. InLas construcciones con se, ed. byCristina Sánchez López, –. Madrid: Visor Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sánchez López, Cristina
    2016 “Pasividad e impersonalidad”. InEnciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, ed. byJavier Gutiérrez Rexach, vol., –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Scott, Kate
    2020 Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Serrano, María José
    2019 “The Variable Functions of Addressing Hearer-Participants with Spanish Second Person Object Forms in Media Discourse”. InIt’s Not All about ‘You’: New Perspectives on Address Research, ed. byBettina Kluge, and María Irene Moyna, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tar.1.11ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.1.11ser [Google Scholar]
34. Serrano, María José
    2021 “Gradual Objectivity. Variation in the Use of the Objectivizing Second-Person Singular Tú in Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.029 [Google Scholar]
35. Serrano, María José
    2022 “Defocusing and the Third-Person Viewpoint: The Pronoun Uno and its Covariation with Clitic se in Spanish”. Lingua: –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Serrano, María José
    2023 “Sintaxis y discurso: El infinitivo independiente en los tuits como variante y punto de vista desubjetivador”. Moenia: –. 10.15304/moenia.id8401
    https://doi.org/10.15304/moenia.id8401 [Google Scholar]
37. Serrano, María José
    2024 “El infinitivo enunciativo. Variación textual y sociopragmática”. Boletín de Filología (): –. 10.4067/S0718‑93032024000100437
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032024000100437 [Google Scholar]
38. Serrano, María José, and Miguel A. Aijón Oliva
    2012 “Cuando tú eres yo: la inespecificidad referencial de tú como objetivación del discurso”. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica: –. 10.24201/nrfh.v60i2.1059
    https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v60i2.1059 [Google Scholar]
39. Siewierska, Anna, and Maria Papastathi
    2011 “Towards a Typology of Third Person Plural Impersonals”. Linguistics: –. 10.1515/ling.2011.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018 [Google Scholar]
40. Truan, Naomi
    2021 The Politics of Person Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.320
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.320 [Google Scholar]
41. Vanderschueren, Clara
    2013 Infinitivo y sujeto en portugués y español: Un estudio empírico de los infinitivos adverbiales con sujeto explícito. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307733 [Google Scholar]
42. Visapää, Laura
    2022 “Infinitives of Affect and Intersubjectivity: On the Indexical Interpretation of the Finnish Independent Infinitives”. Cognitive Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/cog‑2020‑0066
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0066 [Google Scholar]
43. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
    2004 “Relevance Theory”. InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]