Production and understanding of change‑of‑state tokens in English talk‑in‑interaction among L1 and L2 speakers

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   1987 “Oh and Ah in English Conversation.” InCorpus Linguistics and Beyond, ed. byWillem Meijis, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1163/9789004483989_010
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004483989_010 [Google Scholar]
2. Aston, Guy
   1987 “Ah: A Corpus-Based Exercise in Conversational Analysis.” InSpoken Discourse, ed. byJohn Morley, and Alan Partington, –. Camerino: Universita di Camerino.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bolden, Galina B.
   2006 “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers ‘So’ and ‘Oh’ and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00314.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x [Google Scholar]
4. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
   2021 “OH + OKAY in Informing Sequences: On Fuzzy Boundaries in a Particle Combination.” Open Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0151
   https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0151 [Google Scholar]
5. Endo, Tomoko
   2018 “The Japanese Change-of-State Tokens a and aa in Responsive Units.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.010 [Google Scholar]
6. Firth, Alan
   1996 “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality: On ‘Lingua Franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(96)00014‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 [Google Scholar]
7. Gardner, Rod
   2007 “‘Broken’ Starts: Bricolage in Turn Starts in Second Language Talk”. InLanguage Learning and Teaching as Social Interaction, ed. byZhu Hua, Paul Seedhouse, Li Wei, and Vivian Cook, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230591240_5
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591240_5 [Google Scholar]
8. Golato, Andrea
   2012 “German oh: Marking an Emotional Change of State.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699253
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699253 [Google Scholar]
9. Hauser, Eric
   2005 “Coding ‘Corrective Recasts’: The Maintenance of Meaning and More Fundamental Problems.” Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/ami010
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami010 [Google Scholar]
10. Hauser, Eric
    2009 “Turn Taking and Primary Speakership During a Student Discussion.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHanh thi Nguyen, and Gabriele Kasper, –. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hayashi, Makoto, and Kaoru Hayano
    2018 “A-Prefaced Response to Inquiry in Japanese.” InBetween Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages, ed. byJohn Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31.07hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.07hay [Google Scholar]
12. Heinemann, Trine
    2015 “Registering Revision: The Reduplicated Danish Change-of-State Token nå.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445615614131
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615614131 [Google Scholar]
13. Heinemann, Trine
    2016 “From ‘Looking’ to ‘Seeing’: Indexing Delayed Intelligibility of an Object with the Danish Change of State Token n↑å↓:.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.003 [Google Scholar]
14. Heinemann, Trine
    2017 “Transitioning Between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token nå.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.013 [Google Scholar]
15. Heinemann, Trine, and Aino Koivisto
    2016 “Indicating a Change-of-State in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Explorations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.002 [Google Scholar]
16. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJohn Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020 [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500019990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John
    2002 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” InThe Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. byCecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    2005 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKristine L. Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, –. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410611574
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611574 [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John
    2016 “On the Diversity of ‘Changes of State’ and Their Indices.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.007 [Google Scholar]
21. Hosoda, Yuri
    2006 “Repair and Relevance of Differential Language Expertise in Second Language Conversations.” Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/ami022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami022 [Google Scholar]
22. James, Deborah
    1978 “The Use of Oh, Ah, Say, and Well in Relation to a Number of Grammatical Phenomena.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351817809389186
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351817809389186 [Google Scholar]
23. Jefferson, Gail
    1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance/Declination.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, –. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jefferson, Gail
    1984 “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” InDiscourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. byValentina D’Urso, and Paolo Leonardi, –. Padua: Cleup Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
26. Jeon, Youngok
    2019 “A Study on Functions of Exclamation ‘Ah’ Appearing in Conversations.” Language Facts and Perspectives: –. 10.20988/lfp.2019.48..543
    https://doi.org/10.20988/lfp.2019.48..543 [Google Scholar]
27. Kasterpalu, Riina, and Tilt Hennoste
    2016 “Estonian aa: A Multifunctional Change-of-State Token.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.010 [Google Scholar]
28. Kim, Kyu-hyun
    2003 “An Analysis of Collaborative Completion in Korean Conversation.” Language Research (): –. https://hdl.handle.net/10371/86265
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kindt, Duane
    2017 “A Working Paper on Multiple Resources for Indicating Change of State in EFL Conversations for Learning.” Journal of the School of Contemporary International Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Koivisto, Aino
    2015 “Displaying Now-Understanding: The Finnish Change-of-State Token aa.” Discourse Processes (): –. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.914357
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.914357 [Google Scholar]
31. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
32. Kurhila, Salla
    2001 “Correction in Talk Between Native and Non-Native Speaker.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00048‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00048-5 [Google Scholar]
33. Küttner, Uwe A.
    2018 “Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action: The Case of Claiming “Just-Now” Recollection with Oh That’s Right.” Open Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0006 [Google Scholar]
34. Lee, Hyo Sang, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Sang-Seok Yoon
    2017 “Teaching Listener Responses to KFL Students.” The Korean Language in America (): –. 10.5325/korelangamer.21.2.0250
    https://doi.org/10.5325/korelangamer.21.2.0250 [Google Scholar]
35. Lee, Yo-An
    2006 “Respecifying Display Questions: Interactional Resources for Language Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly (): –. 10.2307/40264304
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264304 [Google Scholar]
36. Linneweber, Judith
    2016 “Why a German ‘Oh’ Is Not Necessarily an English ‘Oh’: Showing Understanding and Emotions with Change-of-State Tokens.” Teaching German (): –. 10.1111/tger.12011
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12011 [Google Scholar]
37. Markee, Numa, and Gabriele Kasper
    2004 “Classroom Talks: An Introduction.” The Modern Language Journal (): –. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
38. Maynard, Douglas W.
    2003 Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. hdl.handle.net/10822/1004105
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mori, Junko
    2002 “Task Design, Plan and Development of Talk-in-Interaction: An Analysis of a Small Group Activity in a Japanese Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/23.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.3.323 [Google Scholar]
40. Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Gudrun Ziegler
    2007 “Doing Language, Doing Science and the Sequential Organization of the Immersion Classroom.” InLanguage Learning and Teaching as Social Interaction, ed. byZhu Hua, Paul Seedhouse, Li Wei, and Vivian Cook, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230591240_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591240_6 [Google Scholar]
41. Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Søren W. Eskildsen
    2022 “Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Modern Language Journal (): –. 10.1111/modl.12759
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12759 [Google Scholar]
42. Pike, Kenneth
    1967 Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111657158
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111657158 [Google Scholar]
43. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Language (): –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
45. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1992 “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
46. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2006 “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language and the Arena in Which Culture is Enacted.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. byNicholas J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, –. New York: Berg. 10.4324/9781003135517
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517 [Google Scholar]
47. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
48. Seedhouse, Paul
    2005 “Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching (): –. 10.1017/S0261444805003010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805003010 [Google Scholar]
49. Sidnell, Jack
    2013 “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, –. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Stivers, Tanya
    2004 “‘No No No’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2004.tb00733.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x [Google Scholar]
51. Sullivan, Christopher
    2010 “Change-of-State Tokens in L2 Interactions.” Tokyo Woman’s Christian University Bulletin Journal (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
52. ten Have, Paul
    2007 Doing Conversation Analysis, 2nd ed.London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
53. Weidner, Matylda
    2016 “Aha-Moments in Interaction: Indexing a Change of State in Polish.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
54. Wong, Jean, and Hansun Zhang Waring
    2020 Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429488023
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488023 [Google Scholar]
55. Xu, Meiling
    2019 “A Study on the Chinese Correspondence of Korean Discourse Marker ‘Ah’: By Focusing on the Discourse Function.” The Journal of Foreign Studies: –. 10.15755/jfs.2019..50.273
    https://doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2019..50.273 [Google Scholar]
56. Young, Richard F., and Jina Lee
    2004 “Identifying Units in Interaction: Reactive Tokens in Korean and English Conversations.” Journal of Sociolinguistics (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00266.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00266.x [Google Scholar]