1887
image of Tailoring language to social hierarchies
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a study examining the pragmatic strategies employed by Zeng Guofan in his renowned family letters to craft (, ‘salutation’), as well as the potential relationship between social hierarchies and the specific wording used in these opening phrases. The study reveals that, across 1,449 letters containing salutations, Zeng Guofan deployed seven distinct patterns of salutation. Significant differences were observed in his use of third-person address terms, (, ‘elevated address terms’), verbs, self-address terms, and expressions of good wishes and well-being, depending on the recipient of the letter. These variations suggest clear metapragmatic efforts to maintain respect and deference in his communications, providing evidence that certain patterns of polite salutations were shaped by the perceived social status between the addresser and the addressee in ancient China.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24086.wan
2025-12-19
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Hugh D. R.
    1979Chinese Family and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford
    1961 “Address in American English.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/h0042862
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042862 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cang, He, Juliane House, Fengguang Liu, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2024 “Sympathising with Patients in Historical China: An Interaction Ritual Approach.” Language Sciences: . 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101665
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101665 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Yuenren
    1956 “Chinese Terms of Address.” Language (): –. 10.2307/410666
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410666 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Rong
    2023Chinese Politeness: Diachrony, Variation, and Universals in Politeness Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009281201
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281201 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Xinren
    2012 “‘Polysemous’ Politeness: Speaker Self-Referring Forms in Honglou Meng.” InChinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice, ed. byYuling Pan, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ed. 2017Politeness Phenomena across Chinese Genres. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  10. Gudai hanyu cidian bianxie zu 古代汉语词典编写组
    Gudai hanyu cidian bianxie zu 古代汉语词典编写组 2002 “Gǔdài hànyǔ cídiǎn (dàzì běn)古代汉语词典(大字本) [‘Ancient Chinese dictionary (large character edition)’].” Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanks, William F., Sachiko Ide, and Yasuhiro Katagiri
    2009 “Towards an Emancipatory Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu, and Wenrui Shi
    2023 “Historical Language Use in Europe from a Contrastive Pragmatic Perspective: An Exploratory Case Study of Letter Closings.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad [Google Scholar]
  13. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2007 “On Historical Chinese Apology and Its Strategic Application.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/PR.2007.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2010aHistorical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2010b “Exploring the Historical Chinese Polite Denigration/Elevation Phenomenon.” InHistorical (Im)Politeness, ed. byJonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 “Historical Chinese Politeness and Rhetoric. A Case Study of Epistolary Refusals.” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2019 “Relational Ritual Politeness and Self-Display in Historical Chinese Letters.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (): –. 10.1556/062.2019.72.2.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2019.72.2.4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu, and Yulong Song
    2021 “Admonishing: A Paradoxical Pragmatic Behaviour in Ancient China.” Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.20022.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20022.kad [Google Scholar]
  20. Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu, and Lin Jiao
    2023 “Self-Denigration in Chinese: An Interactional Speech Act Approach.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Yongli, and Yiping Liu
    2021 “Self-Cultivation as the Basis of Person Making: A Confucian Perspective Illustrated by a Case Study of Zeng Guofan.” Psychology and Developing Societies (): –. 10.1177/0971333621990448
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333621990448 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu, Po 卢坡
    2019 “Dǎodú导读 [‘Introduction’].” In“Zēng guófān jiāshū 曾国藩家书 [‘Zeng Guofan’s family letters’]” byZeng Guofan, –. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Ancient Books Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Palander-Collin, Minna
    2009 “Variation and Change in Patterns of Self-Reference in Early English Correspondence.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal [Google Scholar]
  24. Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011aPoliteness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011b “Historical vs. Contemporary Chinese Linguistic Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  26. Peng, Bo 彭博
    2017 “Zēng guófān jiāshū zhōng de déyù sīxiǎng yánjiū《曾国藩家书》中的德育思想研究 [‘A study of moral education ideology in Zeng Guofan’s family letters’].” Yǔwén jiànshè语文建设 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shen, Xingchen, and Xinren Chen
    2019 “Doing Power Threatening Acts (PTAs) in Ancient China: An Empirical Study of Chinese jian Discourse.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.17002.she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17002.she [Google Scholar]
  28. Skewis, Malcolm
    2003 “Mitigated Directness in Honglou Meng: Directive Speech Acts and Politeness in Eighteenth Century Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00084‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00084-X [Google Scholar]
  29. Su, Li 苏力
    2016 “Qí jiā: Fù cí zǐ xiào yǔ zhǎng yòu yǒu xù齐家:父慈子孝与长幼有序 [‘Managing the family: Paternal benevolence, filial piety, and hierarchical order’].” Fǎzhì yǔ shèhuì fāzhǎn法制与社会发展 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Hongjuan 王红娟
    2012 “Shūxìn zhōng de qǐcí书信中的启辞[‘Salutations in letters’].” Yìngyòng xiězuò应用写作 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Yikang, and Xinren Chen
    2024 “Self-Identity Construction via Self-Reference in Pre-Modern Chinese Intellectuals’ Letters Home: A Case Study.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, Zhaoyun, and Shirong Jiang 吴照云, 姜拾荣
    2021 “Zēng guófān jiāshū zhōng de zǔzhī guǎnlǐ sīxiǎng tànjiù曾国藩家书中的组织管理思想探究[‘An exploration of organizational management thought in Zeng Guofan’s family letters].” Jiāngxī shèhuì kēxué江西社会科学 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, Martin C.
    1945A Chinese Village: Taitou, Shantung Province. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng, Guofan 曾国藩
    1985a “Zēng guófān quánjí jiāshū (yī)曾国藩全集 家书(一) [‘The complete works of Zeng Guofan: Family letters (volume 1)’].” Changsha: Yuelu Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1985b “Zēng guófān quánjí jiāshū (èr)曾国藩全集 家书(二) [‘The complete works of Zeng Guofan: Family letters (volume 2)’].” Changsha: Yuelu Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, Jian 张践
    2000 “Rújiā xiàodào guān de xíngchéng yǔ yǎnbiàn儒家孝道观的形成与演变 [‘The formation and evolution of the Confucian concept of filial piety’].” Zhōngguó zhéxué shǐ中国哲学史 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, Heping 赵和平
    2006 “Zhōngguó jiāshū de yuánliú tǐlì hé géshì中国家书的源流体例和格式 [‘The origin, style and format of Chinese letters home’].” Guāngmíng rìbào光明日报, 2006-2-20. jiashu.ruc.edu.cn/jsyj/e597b52fce2e476c9c9e18887fbe880a.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhong, Kezhao 钟克钊
    1996 “Xiào wénhuà de lìshǐ tòushì jí qí xiànshí yìyì孝文化的历史透视及其现实意义 [‘A historical perspective on filial piety culture and its contemporary significance’].” Jiāngsū shèhuì kēxué江苏社会科学 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou, Xiaohong 周晓虹
    2008 “Xiàotì chuántǒng yǔ zhǎng yòu zūn bēi: chuántǒng zhōngguó shèhuì de dài jì guānxì孝悌传统与长幼尊卑:传统中国社会的代际关系 [‘The tradition of filial piety and seniority rules: The inter-generational relationship in traditional Chinese society’].” Zhèjiāng shèhuì kēxué浙江社会科学 (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24086.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24086.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: historical pragmatics ; ancient Chinese ; politeness ; family letters ; salutation ; social hierarchy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error