oa Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards

References

1. Aarsand, Pal A
   (2008) Frame switches and identity performances: Alternating between online and offline. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies28: 147–165. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.007
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.007 [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   (2006a) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 419–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   (2006b) Multilingualism, diaspora, and the Internet: Codes and identities on German-based diaspora websites. Journal of Sociolinguistics10.4: 520–547. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00291.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00291.x [Google Scholar]
4. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   (2007) Style online: Doing hip-hop on the German-speaking web. In P. Auer (ed.), Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 279–318.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   (2008) Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, article 8. RetrievedJune 6, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
   (2011) From variation to heteroglossia in the study of computer-mediated discourse. In C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–298. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0013
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
7. Angouri, Jo , and Theodora Tseliga
   (2010) "you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!" From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 57–82. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.004
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
8. Arundale, Robert B
   (2010) Relating. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 137–167.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baym, Nancy K
   (1995) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1.2. RetrievedJune 6, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue2/baym.html.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baym, Nancy K
    (1996) Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction29: 315–346. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2904_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2904_2 [Google Scholar]
11. Baym, Nancy K
    (1998) The emergence of on-line community. In S.G. Jones (ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 35–68. doi: 10.4135/9781452243689.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243689.n2 [Google Scholar]
12. Bolander, Brook
    (2012) Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness. Journal of Pragmatics44.12: 1607–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.008 [Google Scholar]
13. Bolander, Brook
    (2013) Language and Power in Blogs: Interaction, Disagreements and AgreementsAmsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.237
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.237 [Google Scholar]
14. Bolander, Brook , and Miriam A. Locher
    (2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Pilot on a pilot study. In K. Junod , and D. Maillat (eds.), Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr Francke, pp. 165–185.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bolander, Brook , and Miriam A. Locher
    (2014) Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context & Media3: 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Bousfield, Derek
    (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
17. Bousfield, Derek
    (2010) Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 101–134.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bousfield, Derek , and Miriam A. Locher
    (eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. boyd, Danah M. , and Nicole B. Ellison
    (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13.1: article 11. RetrievedJune 6, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
20. Brown, Penelope , and Steven C. Levinson
    (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Brown, Penelope , and Steven C. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Bucholtz, Mary , and Kira Hall
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7.4–5: 584–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
23. Clarke, Matthew
    (2009) The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics41: 2333–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.001 [Google Scholar]
24. Cotrău, Diana R
    (2005) Online identity of a local young community. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai – Philologia3: 109–116.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics25.3: 349–367. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
26. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (2010) Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics42: 3232–3245. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
27. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
28. Danet, Brenda
    (1998) Text as mask: Gender, play and performance on the Internet. In S. Jones (ed.), CyberSociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. London: Sage, pp. 129–158. doi: 10.4135/9781452243689.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243689.n5 [Google Scholar]
29. Danet, Brenda , and Susan C. Herring
    (eds.) (2007) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Darics, Erika
    (2010) Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 129–150. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.007 [Google Scholar]
31. Davies, Bronwyn , and Rom Harré
    (1990) Positioning: The social construction of self. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior20.1: 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
32. De Fina, Anna
    (2010) The negotiation of identities. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 205–224.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol
    (2006) Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 460–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00288.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00288.x [Google Scholar]
34. DuVal Smith, Anna
    (1999) Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In M. Smith , and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, pp. 134–163.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Eckert, Penelope , and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    (1992) Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live. In K. Hall , M. Bucholtz , and B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Women and Language Group, pp. 89–99.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Eelen, Gino
    (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Fayard, Anne-Laure , and Gerardine DeSanctis
    (2005) Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: A language game analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10.4: article 2. Retrieved June 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/fayard.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2005.tb00265.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00265.x [Google Scholar]
38. Fraser, Bruce
    (1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics14.2: 219–236. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90081‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N [Google Scholar]
39. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    (2006) Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 548–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00292.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00292.x [Google Scholar]
40. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    (2011) "On for drinkies?": Email cues of participant alignments. Language@Internet, 8, article 4. Retrieved June 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Georgakopoulou.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Goffman, Erving
    (1955) On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry18: 213–231.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Goffman, Erving
    (ed.) (1967) Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Goutsos, Dionysis
    (2005) The interaction of generic structure and interpersonal relations in two-party e- chat discourse. Language@Internet, 2: article 3. Retrieved June 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2005/188.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Graham, Sage L
    (2007) Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer- mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 742–759. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
45. Graham, Sage L
    (2008) A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in electronic communities of practice. In D. Bousfield , and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 281–304.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Grice, H. Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole , and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3 Speech Acts). New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Halliday, Michael A.K
    (1978) Language as a social semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hardaker, Claire
    (2010) Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research6: 215–242. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
49. Harrison, Sandra
    (2000) Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an e-mail discussion group. In L. Pemperton , and S. Shurville (eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication. Exeter, UK: Intellect, pp. 69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Haugh, Michael
    (2010) When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 7–31. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
51. Herring, Susan C
    (1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication3: 1–17. RetrievedAugust 22, 2012, fromwww.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/003/2/00328.HTML.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Herring, Susan C
    (1994) Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz , A.C. Liang , L.A. Sutton , and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 278–294.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Herring, Susan C
    (2000) Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal18.1: RetrievedAugust 22, 2012, fromcpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Herring, Susan C
    (2003) Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes , and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 202–228. doi: 10.1002/9780470756942.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9 [Google Scholar]
55. Herring, Susan C
    (2004) Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online communities. In S.A. Barab , R. Kling , and J.H. Gray (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–376. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
56. Herring, Susan C
    (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4: article 1. RetrievedSeptember 08, 2010, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hongladarom, Krisadawan , and Soraj Hongladarom
    (2005) Politeness in Thai computer-mediated communication. In R.T. Lakoff , S. Ide , and J.L. Mey (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 145–162. doi: 10.1075/pbns.139.14hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.139.14hon [Google Scholar]
58. Hübler, Mike T. , and Diana C. Bell
    (2003) Computer-mediated humor and ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities. Computers and Composition20: 277–294. doi: 10.1016/S8755‑4615(03)00036‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(03)00036-7 [Google Scholar]
59. Hymes, Dell
    (1974) Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Ifukor, Presley
    (2011) Linguistic marketing in "… a marketplace of ideas": Language choice and intertextuality in a Nigerian virtual community. Pragmatics and Society2.1: 110–147. doi: 10.1075/ps.2.1.06ifu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.2.1.06ifu [Google Scholar]
61. Jones, Graham , and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    (2009) Talking text and talking back: "My bff Jill?" from boob tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communiction14.4: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromonlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x/pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Jones, Graham , Bambi B. Schieffelin , and Rachel Smith
    (2011) When friends who talk stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–47. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
63. Jucker, Andreas H. , and Irma Taavitsainen
    (2012) Pragmatic variables. In J.M. Hernández-Campoy , and J.C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 293–306. doi: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch16 [Google Scholar]
64. Kienpointner, Manfred
    (1997) Varieties of rudeness. Functions of Language4: 251–287. doi: 10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie [Google Scholar]
65. Kiesler, Sara , Jane Siegel , and Timothy McGuire
    (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communication. American Psychologist39.10: 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
66. Kleinke, Sonja
    (2010) Interactive aspects of computer-mediated communication: 'Disagreement' in an English-speaking and a German-speaking public news group. In S. Tanskanen , L. Helasvuo , M. Johannson , and M. Raitaniemi (eds.), Discourses in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 195–222. doi: 10.1075/pbns.203.15kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.203.15kle [Google Scholar]
67. Kollock, Peter , and Mark A. Smith
    (1996) Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S.C. Herring (ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 109–128. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39.10kol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.10kol [Google Scholar]
68. Kollock, Peter , and Mark A. Smith
    (eds.) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge. doi: 10.5117/9789056290818
    https://doi.org/10.5117/9789056290818 [Google Scholar]
69. Korenman, Joan , and Nancy Wyatt
    (1996) Group dynamics on an e-mail forum. In S.C. Herring (ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 225–242. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39.18kor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.18kor [Google Scholar]
70. Kouper, Inna
    (2010) The pragmatics of peer advice in a LiveJournal community. Language@Internet7: article 1. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2464.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lachenicht, Lance G
    (1980) Aggravating language: A study of abusive and insulting language. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal in Human Communication13.4: 607–687. doi: 10.1080/08351818009370513
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818009370513 [Google Scholar]
72. Lakoff, Robin T
    (1973) The logic of politeness, or minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistics Society9: 292–305.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Langlotz, Andreas , and Miriam A. Locher
    (2012) Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics44.12: 1591–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002 [Google Scholar]
74. Lee, Carmen K.M
    (2011) Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–130. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
75. Leech, Geoffrey N
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Locher, Miriam A
    (2006) Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua25.3: 249–267. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
77. Locher, Miriam A
    (2008) Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In G. Antos , E. Ventola , and T. Weber (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (Vol. 6 Handbooks of Applied Linguistics). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 509–540.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Locher, Miriam A
    (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research6: 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
79. Locher, Miriam A
    (2011) Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. In B. Davies , M. Haugh , and A.J. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 187–208.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Locher, Miriam A
    (2012) Politeness. In C.E. Chapelle (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0916
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0916 [Google Scholar]
81. Locher, Miriam A. , and Brook Bolander
    (2014) Relational work and the display of multilingualism in two Facebook groups. In K. Bedijs , C. Maaß , and G. Held (eds.), Facework & Social Media. Münster: Lit- Verlag, pp. 157-191.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Locher, Miriam A. , and Brook Bolander
    (2015) Humour in microblogging: Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. In M. Dynel , and J. Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-155. doi: 10.1075/pbns.256.06loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.06loc [Google Scholar]
83. Locher, Miriam A. , and Sage L. Graham
    (2010) Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1515/9783110214338
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338 [Google Scholar]
84. Locher, Miriam A. , and Sage L. Graham
    (eds.) (2010) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214338
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338 [Google Scholar]
85. Locher, Miriam A. , and Sebastian Hoffmann
    (2006) The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American Internet advice column. Text and Talk26: 67–104.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research1: 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
87. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    (2008) Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield , and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 77–99. doi: 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
88. Luchjenbroers, June , and Michelle Aldridge-Waddon
    (2011) Paedophiles and politeness in email communications: Community of practice needs that define face-threat. Journal of Politeness Research7: 21–42. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2011.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
89. Maricic, Ibolya
    (2005) Face in Cyberspace: Facework, (Im)politeness and Conflict in English Discussion Groups. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    (2002) Language and identity. In J.K. Chambers , P. Trudgill , and N. Schilling- Estes (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford, England: Blackwell, pp. 475–499.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Neurater-Kessels, Manuela
    (2013) Impoliteness in Cyberspace: Personally Abusive Reader Responses in Online News Media. Ph.D. thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Available at: opac.nebis.ch/ediss/20131752.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Nishimura, Yukiko
    (2010) Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 33–55. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
93. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (2010) Politeness in East Asia. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 71–100.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Page, Ruth
    (2011) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Papacharissi, Zizi
    (ed.) (2011) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Planchenault, Gaëlle
    (2010) Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites' website. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 83–103. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
97. Rasulo, Margaret
    (2008) The concept of 'identity formation' within online professional learning communities. In M. Solly (ed.), Verbal/visual Narrative Texts in Higher Education. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 203–228.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Reid, Elizabeth
    (1999) Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. Smith , and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, pp. 107–133.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Rheingold, Howard
    (1993) The Virtual Community. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Schiffrin, Deborah
     (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Malden: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Schneider, Klaus Peter , and Anne Barron
     (2008) Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics. In K.P. Schneider , and A. Barron (eds.), Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1075/pbns.178
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178 [Google Scholar]
102. Sifianou, Maria
     (2010) Linguistic politeness: Laying the foundations. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 17–41.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Simmons, Thomas L
     (1994) Politeness Theory in Computer-Mediated Communication: Face-threatening Acts in a "Faceless" Medium (Unpublished master’s thesis, Ashton University, Birmingham, England 1994) Retrieved June 23, 2013, fromeric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED381005.
104. Smith, Christine B. , Margaret L. McLaughlin , and Kerry K. Osborne
     (1997) Conduct control on Usenet.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2.4: 1–11. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/smith.html.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
     (2005) (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research1.1: 95–119. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
106. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
     (2007a) Identity, face and (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 635–638. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.013 [Google Scholar]
107. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
     (2007b) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 639–656. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
108. Stommel, Wyke
     (2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet5: article 5. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1537.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Stommel, Wyke , and Tom Koole
     (2010) The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies12: 357–378. doi: 10.1177/1461445609358518
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609358518 [Google Scholar]
110. Sweetser, Eve E
     (1987) The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype. In D. Holland , and N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–66. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.003 [Google Scholar]
111. Tannen, Deborah , and Anna Marie Trester
     (2013) Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media. Georgetown University Press: Georgetown.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Thurlow, Crispin , and Kristine Mroczek
     (2011) Introduction: Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.xix–xliv. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
113. Turkle, Sherry
     (1995) Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Upadhyay, Shiv R
     (2010) Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 105–127. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.006 [Google Scholar]
115. Verschueren, Jeff
     (1999) Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Walther, Joseph B
     (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research19: 52–90. doi: 10.1177/009365092019001003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003 [Google Scholar]
117. Walther, Joseph B
     (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research23.1: 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001 [Google Scholar]
118. Watts, Richard. J
     (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
119. Watts, Richard J
     (2010) Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics (Vol. 6 Handbooks of Pragmatics). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 43–70.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Watzlawick, Paul , Janet H. Beavin , and Don D. Jackson
     (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Wenger, Etienne
     (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
122. Weber, H.L
     (2011) Missed cues: How disputes can socialize virtual newcomers. Language@Internet8: article 5. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Weber.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Yus, Francisco
     (2011) Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.213
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
124. Zappavigna, Michele
     (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Zhao, Shanyang , Sherri Grasmuck , and Jason Martin
     (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior24: 1816–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 [Google Scholar]