1887
Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Facebook forms one of the most widely used online social networks, through which people manage their communication with diverse contacts or ‘friends’, ranging from members of the family and schoolmates to work colleagues and popular cultural idols or other people, whom they admire. Hence, it can be seen as an integral part of people’s digital presence. Against this backdrop, the aim of this paper is to investigate the ways politeness is constructed in a context, in which it is not very typical to find politeness in the Western world: The reception of birthday wishes. The focus is on the (para)linguistic reception of birthday wishes on behalf of 400 native Greek users of Facebook, aged between 25–35 years old, as evidenced in the ways they respond to birthday wishes posted on their walls. By using a combination of interactional sociolinguistics, discourse-centered online ethnography and offline ethnographic interviews, I argue that native speakers of Greek do not just stick to the politic behavior found in other languages, like English, of personally thanking their friends for their birthday wishes; rather, they employ contextualization cues, such as shifts in spelling, emoticons and punctuation markers, in order to construct frames and footings of politeness by actually reciprocating the wishes they received from their friends. The value of this study lies not only in being, to my knowledge, the first description and interpretation of an important cultural phenomenon for Greeks, which is the exchange of birthday wishes, but also it contributes towards understanding politeness in online environments, such as Facebook, which in turn is used for establishment and maintenance of interpersonal relationships, hence it can lead to smooth communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.1.02the
2015-03-01
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    (2008) Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography. [email protected]5: article 8. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2011, fromwww.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1610/index_html
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2009) ‘Greeklish’: Transliteration practice and discourse in the context of computer-mediated digraphia. In A. Georgakopoulou , and M. Silk (eds.), Standard Languages and Language Standards: Greek, Past and Present. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 221–249.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcimavičienė, Liudmila
    (2010) Cognitive approach to language teaching. Cultural reality through metaphor: A case study of birthday wishes. Respectus Philologicus18.23: 170–178. Retrieved April 16, 2011, fromwww.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=35dd9c9c-8ea5-4e33-8282-1382cb69c465&articleId=75ceed9f-1c7a-45fa-b92b-f5a64aa016af.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, David , and Carmen Lee
    (2013) Language Online. Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson, Gregory
    (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolander, Brook , and Miriam A. Locher
    (2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In D. Mailla , and K. Junod (eds.), Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 165–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2014) Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context and Media3: 14-26. doi: 10/1076/j.dcm.2013/10.004
    https://doi.org/10/1076/j.dcm.2013/10.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre
    (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991) Language & Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. boyd, Danah M. , and Nicole B. Ellison
    (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13.1: article 11. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Brandtzæg, Petter B
    (2012) Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17.4: 467–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01580.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryman, Alan E
    (2001) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bucholtz, Mary
    (2007) Interviews and interaction as sociolinguistic data. Presentation at the‘Ethnographic Methods in Sociocultural Linguistics’ Workshop. Stanford University. RetrievedJuly 13, 2011, fromwww.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/bucholtz/EthnoWorkshop/Bucholtz.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chatfield, Tom
    (2013) Netymology. From Apps to Zombies: A Linguistic Celebration of the Digital World. London: Quercus.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Emerson, Robert M. , Rachel I. Fretz , and Linda L. Shaw
    (2001) Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson , A. Coffey , S. Delamont , J. Lofland , and L. Lofland (eds.), Handbook of Ethnography. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 352–368. doi: 10.4135/9781848608337.n24
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337.n24 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ess, Charles , and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee
    (2001) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, from, www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
  17. Eysenbach, Gunther , and James E. Till
    (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ323: 1103–1105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman, Erving
    (1967) On face work. Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, pp. 5–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York.: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodwin, Charles , and Alessandro Duranti
    (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti , and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodwin, Charles , and John Heritage
    (1990) Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 283–307. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/90conv_an.pdf. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gumperz, John J
    (ed.) (1982) Language and Social Identity. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In S. Sarangi , and C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 453–472. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375.4.453
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.4.453 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gumperz, John J. , and Dell Hymes
    (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt Rinehard and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Herring, Susan C
    (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. [email protected]4: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Herring, Susan C. , Lois A. Scheidt , Sabrina Bonus , and Elija Wright
    (2004) Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences . Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.student.tue.nl/V/t.s.oosterwijk/ModellerenB/Literature/19%20Genre%20Analysis.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kahn, Seth
    (2011) Putting ethnographic writing in context. In C. Lowe , and P. Zemliansky (eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces2/kahn-putting-ethnographic-writing.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalman, Yoram M. , and Darren Gergle
    (2010) CMC cues enrich lean online communication: The case of letter and punctuation mark repetitions. Proceedings of the AIS 5th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2010) . Retrieved23 June, 2013, fromwww.kalmans.com/MCIS2010Cues.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Karakayali, Nedim , and Aysenur Kilic
    (2013) More network conscious than ever? Challenges, strategies, and analytic labor of users in the Facebook environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18.2: 61–79. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12005
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Koutsogiannis, Dimitris , and Bessie Mitsikopoulou
    (2003) Greeklish and Greekness: Trends and discourses of "glocalness". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9.1: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/kouts_mits.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Locher, Miriam A
    (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture6.1: 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lucy, John A
    (1992) Language Diversity and Thought. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620843
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620843 [Google Scholar]
  34. Manovich, Lea
    (2001) The Language of New Media. Boston, MA: MIT Press. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromandreknoerig.de/portfolio/03/bin/resources/manovich-langofnewmedia.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Miller, Carolyn. R. , and Dawn Shepherd
    (2004) Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In L.J. Gurak , S. Antonijevic , L. Johnson , N. Ratliff , and J. Reyman (eds.), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Retrieved June 23, 2013, fromblog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_a_genre_analysis_of_the_weblog.html
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ortega y Gasset, Jose
    (1959) The difficulty of reading. Diogenes28: 1–17. doi: 10.1177/039219215900702801
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219215900702801 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pauwels, Luc
    (2012) A multimodal framework for analyzing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17.3: 247–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01572.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Rampton, Ben , Karen Tusting , Janet Maybin , Richard Barwell , Angela Creese , and Vally Lytra
    (2004) UK Linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2011, fromwww.ling-ethnog.org.uk/documents/discussion_paper_jan_05.pdf.
  39. Sandler, Randall
    (2013) Vignette 3d. Real ethical issues in virtual world research. In C. Mallinson , Becky Childs , and Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 48-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sifianou, Maria
    (1992) Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Spilioti, Tereza
    (2009) Graphemic representation of text-messaging: Alphabet-choice and code-switches in Greek SMS. Pragmatics19.3: 393–412. doi: 10.1075/prag.19.3.05spi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.3.05spi [Google Scholar]
  43. Walther, Joseph B. , and Jeong-woo Jang
    (2012) Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18.1: 2–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01592.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Tannen, Deborah , and Cynthia Wallat
    (1999) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas. In A. Jaworski , and N. Coupland (eds.), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 346–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Theodoropoulou, Irene
    (2014a) Sociolinguistics of Style and Social Class in Contemporary Athens. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.57
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.57 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2014b) Facebook talk: An interactional analysis of Aganaktismenoi Wall discussions. In M. Christodoulidou (ed.), Greek Talk-in-Interaction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 262-289.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2014c) Intercultural communicative styles in Qatar: Greek and Qataris. In R. Raddawi (ed.), Intercultural Communication with Arabs: Studies in Education, Professional, and Societal Contexts. New York: Springer, pp. 11-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tusting, Karin , and Janet Maybin
    (2007) Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics11.5: 575–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00340.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00340.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Watts, Richard J
    (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams, Glyn
    (1992) Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, Guo
    (2011) Age, culture, and communication: Contextualization and framing in a playful online forum. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology48: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.1.02the
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error