Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis (CA), we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not only to relationships but also to identities through this practice. In this way, we suggest that online discussion boards afford both meaningful interaction and relational work. We further claim that this analysis provides support for the theoretical position that while relational practices may intersect with the emergence of identities, they remain distinct analytical concerns.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    (2006) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 419–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Charles , and S. Widdicombe
    (1998) Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki , and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arundale, Robert B
    (1999) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics9.1: 119–154. doi: 10.1075/prag.9.1.07aru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.07aru [Google Scholar]
  4. Arundale, Robert
    (2005) Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation. In K. Fitch , and R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 41-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arundale, Robert B
    (2006) Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research2.2: 193–216. doi: 10.1515/PR.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2009) Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini , and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 33–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2010a) Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics42.8: 2078–2105. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2010b) Relating. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 137–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope , and Steven C. Levinson
    (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bunz, Ulla , and Scott W. Campbell
    (2004) Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports21.1: 11–25. doi: 10.1080/08824090409359963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409359963 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, Wei-Lin M. , and Michael Haugh
    (2011) Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics43.12: 2948–2963. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) Face in Taiwanese business interactions: From emic concepts to emic practices. In Y. Pan , and D.Z. Kádár (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice. London: Equinox, pp. 127–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun, Lan , and Yun Zhao
    (2010) Apology strategies between social unequals in The Dream of the Red Chamber. Chinese Language and Discourse1.2: 264–292. doi: 10.1075/cld.1.2.06lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.2.06lan [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook, Haruko
    (2006) Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua25.3: 269–291. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  16. Daft, Richard L. , and Robert H. Lengel
    (1984) Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L.L. Cummings , and B.M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: JAI Press, pp. 191–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Daft, R.L. , and R.H. Lengel
    (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32.5: 554–571. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
    https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 [Google Scholar]
  18. Danet, Brenda , and Susan C. Herring
    (eds.) (2003) The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication in instant messaging, email and chat. Special issue ofJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication9(1): RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (eds.) (2007) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davies, Bethan L. , Andrew J. Merrison , and Angela Goddard
    (2007) Institutional apologies in UK higher education: Getting back into the black before going into the red. Journal of Politeness Research3.1: 39–63. doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. de Oliveira, Sandi M
    (2003) Breaking conversational norms on a Portuguese users network: Mean as adjudicators of politeness?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9.1RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/oliveira.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dongman tieba [animation notice bar]. Baidu Teiba. (n.d.) Retrieved13 July, 2011, fromtieba.baidu.com/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dresner, Eli , and Susan C. Herring
    (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20: 249–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2010.01362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Drew, Paul
    (1995) Conversation analysis. In J. Smith , R. Harre , and L. van Langenhove (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, pp. 64–79. doi: 10.4135/9781446221792.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221792.n5 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction31: 295–325. doi: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eelen, Gino
    (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ess, Charles and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee
    (2001)  Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee . Retrieved June 23, 2013, from, www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
  28. Eysenbach, Gunther , and James E. Till
    (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ323: 1103–1105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 [Google Scholar]
  29. Foucault, Michel
    (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    (2006) Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics10.4: 548–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00292.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00292.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Graham, Sage L
    (2007) Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer - mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics39: 742–759. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2008) A manual for (im)politeness? The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice. In D. Bousfield , and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gu, Yuego
    (1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14.2: 237–257. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  34. Harrison, Sandra
    (2000) Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an e-mail discussion group. In L. Pemberton , and S. Shurville (eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication. Exeter, England: Intellect, pp. 69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2007) Transgressions, miscommunication and flames: Problematic incidents in email discussions. In M. Consalvo , and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.), Internet Research Annual. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hatipoğlu, Ciler
    (2007) (Im)politeness, national and professional identities and context: Some evidence from e-mailed 'Call for papers'. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 760–773. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  37. Haugh, Michael
    (2007a) Emic conceptulisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 657–680. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2007b) The discursive challenge to politeness theory: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research3.2: 295–317. doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2008) The discursive negotiation of international student identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education29.2: 207–222. doi: 10.1080/01596300801966849
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300801966849 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2009) Face and interaction. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini , and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2010a) When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 7–31. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2010b) Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics42.8: 2107–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2010c) Respect and deference. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 271–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2011) Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In B. Davies , M. Haugh , and A. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 165–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2012) Conversational interaction. In K. Allan , and K.M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–274. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2014) (Im)politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Haugh, Michael , and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
    (2015) Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards. In M. Dynel , and J. Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 99-133. doi: 10.1075/pbns.256.05hau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.05hau [Google Scholar]
  48. Herring, Susan C
    (1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. The Electronic Journal of Communication3(2): RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/003/2/00328.HTML
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (1994) Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz , A. Liang , L. Sutton , and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 278–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1999) The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society, 15 (3): 151-167. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/harassment.pdf doi: 10.1080/019722499128466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128466 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2000) Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal18(1): RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromcpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2003) Gender and power in on-line communication. In J. Holmes , and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 202–228. doi: 10.1002/9780470756942.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2004a) Computer-mediated analysis. An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. Barab , R. Kling , and J.H. Gray (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–376. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2004b) Computer-mediated communication and woman's place. In M. Bucholtz (ed.), Language and Woman's Place. Text and Commentaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 216–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet4: article 1. RetrievedSeptember 08, 2010, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (2010) Computer-mediated conversation: Introduction and overview. Language@internet7: article 2. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2801
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Herring, Susan C. , and John C. Paolillo
    (2006) Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics10.4: 439–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00287.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00287.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Holmes, Janet , and Stephanie Schnurr
    (2005) Politeness, humour and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research1.1: 121–149. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hongladarom, Krisadawan , and Soraj Hongladarom
    (2005) Politeness in Thai computer-mediated communication. In R.T. Lakoff , S. Ide , and J.L. Mey (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 145–162. doi: 10.1075/pbns.139.14hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.139.14hon [Google Scholar]
  60. Jefferson, Gail
    (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems35.4: 418–441. doi: 10.2307/800595
    https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones, Steven G
    (ed.) (1997) Virtual Culture. Identity and Communication in Cyberspace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kádár, Daniel Z
    (2007) Terms of (Im)politeness. A Study of the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese (Im)polite Terms of Address. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. (2010) Exploring the historical Chinese polite denigration/elevation phenomenon. In J. Culpeper , and D.Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 117–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kádár, Daniel Z. , and Michael Haugh
    (2013) Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  65. Kádár, Daniel Z. , and Sara Mills
    (2011) Introduction. In D.Z. Kádár , and S. Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kiesler, Sara , Jane Siegel , and Timothy McGuire
    (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communication. American Psychologist39.10: 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lakoff, Robin T
    (1973) The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's. Chicago Linguistics Society9: 292–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lamerichs, Joyce , and Hedwig Te Molder
    (2003) Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society5.4: 451–473. doi: 10.1177/146144480354001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480354001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Leech, Geoffrey
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Lindström, Anna , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    (2012) Affiliation in conversation. In Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.350–369. doi: 10.1002/9781118325001.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  71. Locher, Miriam A
    (2006) Advice online. Advice-giving in an American internet health column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2008) Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In G. Antos , and E. Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 509–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  74. (2011) Situated impoliteness: The interface between identity work and relational construction. In B. Davies , M. Haugh , and A. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, pp. 187–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research1.1: 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  76. Merrison, Andrew , Bethan Davies , Jack J. Wilson , and Michael Haugh
    (2012) Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics44.9: 1077–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mills, Sara
    (2009) Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics41.5: 1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mills, Sara , and Daniel Z. Kádár
    (2011) Politeness and culture. In D.Z. Kádár , and S. Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–44. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.004 [Google Scholar]
  79. Mullany, Louise
    (2010) Gender and interpersonal pragmatics. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 225–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Nishimura, Yukiko
    (2008) Japanese BBS websites as online communities: (Im)politeness perspectives. Language@Internet5: article 3. RetrievedDecember 5, 2011, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1520.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. (2010) Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 33–55. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
  82. OED Online
    (2008) Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press. RetrievedJanuary 20, 2010, fromdictionary.oed.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Owen, Marion
    (1983) Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Pan, Yuling , and Daniel Z. Kádár
    (2011) Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja
    (2005) Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research1.2: 193–217. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193 [Google Scholar]
  86. Planchenault, Gaëlle
    (2010) Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites' website. Journal of Politeness Research6.1: 83–104. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
  87. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984) Pursuing a response. In J.M. Atkinson , and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Pudlinski, Christopher
    (2005) Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line. Discourse Studies7.3: 267–288. doi: 10.1177/1461445605052177
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605052177 [Google Scholar]
  89. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R
    (1952) Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Robinson, Jeffrey D
    (2004) The sequential organisation of "explicit" apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction37.3: 291–330. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2 [Google Scholar]
  91. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (2005) On complainability. Social Problems52.4: 449–476. doi: 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
    https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449 [Google Scholar]
  92. (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39: 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  93. Shils, Edward
    (1982) The Constitution of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    (2007) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics39.4: 639–656. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  95. (2009) Face, identity and interactional goals. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini , and M. Haugh (eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Stommel, Wyke
    (2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet5: article 5. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1537.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Stubbe, Maria , Chris Lane , Jo Hilder , Elaine Vine , Bernadette Vine , Meredith Marra. , Janet Holmes , and  A. Weatherall
     (2003) Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies5.3: 351–388. doi: 10.1177/14614456030053004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030053004 [Google Scholar]
  98. Su, His-Yao
    (2003) The multilingual and multi-orthographic Taiwan-based Internet: Creative uses of writing systems on college-affiliated BBSs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9(1): RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/su.html
    [Google Scholar]
  99. (2007) The multilingual and multi-orthographic Taiwan-based Internet: Creative uses of writing systems on college-affiliated BBSs. In B. Danet , and S.C. Herring (eds.), Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–86. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304794.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  100. (2009) Reconstructing Taiwanese and Taiwan guoyu on the Taiwan-based internet. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication19.2: 313–335. doi: 10.1075/japc.19.2.08su
    https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.19.2.08su [Google Scholar]
  101. Thimm, Caja
    (2008) Technically-mediated interpersonal communication. In G. Antos , and E. Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 331–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Tsai, I.-Ting
    (2007) Studying Apologies. A Comparison of DCT and Role-play Data. Unpublished MA thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Vandergriff, Ilona
    (2013) Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communicative (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics51: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  104. Vinagre, Margarita
    (2008) Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges. Computers and Education, 50.3: 1022–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  105. Wang, Yin-han
    (2009) 'Posing into being': An exploratory study of Taiwanese girls self-portraiture online. In N. Carpentier , P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt , R. Kilborn , T. Olsson , H. Nieminen , E. Sundin , and K. Nordenstreng (eds.), Communicative Approaches to Politics and Ethics in Europe. Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press, pp. 179–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Watts, Richard J
    (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  107. Weber, H.L
    (2011) Missed cues: How disputes can socialize virtual newcomers. Language@Internet8: article 5: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Weber
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    (2004) Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error