1887
Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper applies the theoretical concept of ‘acts of positioning’ (Davis & Harré 1990) to a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 474 status updates (SUs) taken from the Facebook Walls of twenty individuals living in Switzerland and the UK. Our aim is to analyze how individuals construct their identities through the use of language. The results show that individuals position themselves in five central ways, i.e., they stress aspects of their personality, pastime endeavors, sense of humor, work and relationship. Through a subsequent analysis of 228 reactions to status updates (RSUs), we also address how these acts are responded to, and thereby demonstrate that individuals predominantly support identity claims made in the SUs. Our paper contributes to existing research on language and identity in social network sites (SNSs), and demonstrates the fruitful application of the concept of ‘acts of positioning’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.1.05bol
2015-03-01
2019-08-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    (2006) Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 419–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Baym, Nancy K
    (1995a) The emergence of on-line community. In S.G. Jones (ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 35–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1995b) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication1.2RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue2/baym.html
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolander, Brook , and Miriam A. Locher
    (2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In K. Junod , and D. Maillet (eds.), Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 165–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2014) Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context & Media3: 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. boyd, Danah M
    (2004) Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004) . Vienna: ACM Press, pp. 1279–1282.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. boyd, Danah , and Nicole B. Ellison
    (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13.1: article 11. RetrievedJune 6, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00393.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucholtz, Mary , and Kira Hall
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7.4–5: 584–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cassidy, John
    (2006) The online life. Me media. How hanging out on the became big business. The New Yorker50–59. Retrieved onJune 23, 2013, fromwww.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/15/060515fa_fact_cassidy
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crystal, David
    (2006) Language and the Internet. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Donath, Judith S
    (1999) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M.A. Smith , and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge, pp. 29–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Donath, Judith S. , and Danah M. boyd
    (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal22.4: 71–82. doi: 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, Bronwyn , and Rom Harré
    (1990) Positioning: The social construction of self. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior20.1: 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellison, Nicole , Charles Steinfield , and Cliff Lampe
    (2007) The benefits of Facebook "friends": Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12.3: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ess, Charles and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee
    (2001) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. RetrievedJune 23, 2013, from, www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eysenbach, Gunther , and James E. Till
    (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ323: 1103–1105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 [Google Scholar]
  17. Facebook
    (2011) RetrievedApril 8, 2011, fromwww.facebook.com
  18. Facebook Statistics
  19. Gonzalez, Nick
    (2011) Checkfacebook. RetrievedMarch 27, 2011, fromwww.checkfacebook.com/
  20. Herring, Susan C
    (1996) Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer -mediated communication. In C. Ess (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 115–145. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. [email protected]4: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen , and A.M. Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, Graham , Bambi B. Schieffelin , and Rachel Smith
    (2011) When friends who talk stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–47. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Joseph, Joseph E
    (2004) Language and Identity. National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Carmen K.M
    (2011) Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110–130. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lewis, Kevin , Jason Kaufmann , Marco Gonzalez , Andreas Wimmer , and Nicholas Christakis
    (2008) Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks30.4: 330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Locher, Miriam A
    (2008) Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In G. Antos , E. Ventola , and T. Weber (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (Vol. 6 Handbooks of Applied Linguistics). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 509–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research6: 1–5. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Locher, Myriam A
    (2014) Electronic discourse. In K.P. Schneider , and A. Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 557-582. doi: 10.1515/9783110214406‑021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-021 [Google Scholar]
  30. Locher, Miriam A. , and Brook Bolander
    (2014) Relational work and the display of multilingualism in two Facebook groups. In K. Bedijs , C. Maaß , and G. Held (eds.), Facework & Social Media. Münster: Lit-Verlag, pp. 157-191.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Humour in microblogging. Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. In M. Dynel , and J. Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.135-155 doi: 10.1075/pbns.256.06loc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.06loc [Google Scholar]
  32. Locher, Miriam A. , and Sage L. Graham
    (2010) Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics Vol. 6 Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1515/9783110214338
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338 [Google Scholar]
  33. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of politeness research1: 9–33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2008) Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield , and M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 77–99. doi: 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayer, Adalbert , and Steven L. Puller
    (2008) The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics92: 329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    (2002) Language and identity. In J. K. Chambers , P. Trudgill , and N. Schilling- Estes (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford, England: Blackwell, pp. 475–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mullany, Louise
    (2004) Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings. Multilingua23.1–2: 13–37. doi: 10.1515/mult.2004.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Oxford English Dictionary Online (2010) Identity, n. Sense 2b). Retrieved February 10, 2010, fromwww.oed.com/view/Entry/91004?redirectedFrom=identity#eid.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rampton, Ben
    (1995) Crossing: Language & Ethnicity among Adolescents. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nastri, Jacqueline , Jorge Peña , and Jeffrey T. Hancock
    (2006) The construction of away messages: A speech act analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11.4: RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromjcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/nastri.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.00306.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00306.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Schnurr, Stephanie
    (2010) Humour. In M.A. Locher , and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 307–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thurlow, Crispin , and Kristine Mroczek
    (2011) Introduction: Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. In C. Thurlow , and K. Mroczek (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xix–xliv. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Turkle, Sherry
    (1995) Life on the Screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1996) Who am we. InWired.RetrievedJune 23, 2013, fromwww.wired.com/wired/archive/4.01/turkle_pr.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Searle, John R
    (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  46. (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sundén, Jenny
    (2003) Material Virtualities: Approaching Online Textual Embodiment. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. West, Laura , and Anna Marie Trester
    (2013) Facework on Facebook: Conversations on social media. In D. Tannen , and A.M. Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 133-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilbur, Shawn P
    (1996) An archaeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In D. Porter (ed.), Internet Culture. New York: Routledge, pp. 5–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zappavigna, Michele
    (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhao, Shanyang , Sherri Grasmuck , and Jason Martin
    (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior24: 1816–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.1.05bol
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Facebook , Linguistic identity construction , Microblogging , Positioning and Relational work
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error